element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Members
    Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Achievement Levels
    • Members Area
    • Personal Blogs
    • Feedback and Support
    • What's New on element14
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Learning Center
    • eBooks
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Product Groups
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose Another Store
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
Publications
  • Learn
  • More
Publications
Blog Apple claims landmark patent victory
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Publications requires membership for participation - click to join
Blog Post Actions
  • Subscribe by email
  • More
  • Cancel
  • Share
  • Subscribe by email
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: Joshua_Evans
  • Date Created: 28 Dec 2011 11:44 AM Date Created
  • Views 171 views
  • Likes 1 like
  • Comments 1 comment
  • news_a
Related
Recommended

Apple claims landmark patent victory

Joshua_Evans
Joshua_Evans
28 Dec 2011

The ongoing patent war between a number of the world's biggest smartphone manufacturers has taken another twist, with a US judge ruling that a set of important features commonly found in the devices are protected by an Apple patent. The landmark ruling, delivered by the United States International Trade Commission, could have enormous implications for Goggle's Android-operated handsets.
It is, in fact, regarded as one of the most critical rulings delivered in the patent debate, as a number of the most powerful manufacturers argue over who owns the intellectual property rights to certain design features. Google and Apple have, of course, been at the centre of the disputes, which have assumed even more significance in light of the burgeoning popularity of Android-powered smartphones.
The disputes are focused on the small but convenient features that are found on most of the leading handsets. The most recent ruling, for example, focussed on the technology that allows users to tap their finger once on the touch screen to call a phone number that is written inside an email or text message. Furthermore, the case also considered the technology that allows users to schedule a calendar appointment with a single tap of the finger.
Responding to the ruling, Taiwanese firm HTC, the defendant in the case, pledged to adapt its features to comply with the decision. It did, however, stress that the patent infringements represented only a "small" part of the user experience, suggesting that HTC handsets will not profoundly change in light of the ruling.
In fact, even though Apple is able to claim victory in this instance, it does not come without an important caveat. That's because the commission overruled an earlier decision that went in Apple's favor in the case, involving another patent relating to how software is organized internally on the handsets. And according to legal experts, it would have been difficult for HTC to adapt its devices to avoid infringing that patent.
In a statement, Grace Lei, HTC's General Counsel, said that the company was pleased the commission ruled against Apple on other patents involved in the case. "We are very pleased with the determination and we respect it," Ms Lei remarked.
Meanwhile, Apple Spokeswoman Kristin Huguet said: "We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours."
Steve Jobs, the former Chief Executive at Apple, famously once said that he was going to "destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product". And given the obvious intensity of the rivalry between the two firms, it is apparent that Mr Jobs' statement was not an exaggeration.

The ongoing patent war between a number of the world's biggest smartphone manufacturers has taken another twist, with a US judge ruling that a set of important features commonly found in the devices are protected by an Apple patent. The landmark ruling, delivered by the United States International Trade Commission, could have enormous implications for Goggle's Android-operated handsets.

 

It is, in fact, regarded as one of the most critical rulings delivered in the patent debate, as a number of the most powerful manufacturers argue over who owns the intellectual property rights to certain design features. Google and Apple have, of course, been at the centre of the disputes, which have assumed even more significance in light of the burgeoning popularity of Android-powered smartphones.

 

The disputes are focused on the small but convenient features that are found on most of the leading handsets. The most recent ruling, for example, focussed on the technology that allows users to tap their finger once on the touch screen to call a phone number that is written inside an email or text message. Furthermore, the case also considered the technology that allows users to schedule a calendar appointment with a single tap of the finger.

 

Responding to the ruling, Taiwanese firm HTC, the defendant in the case, pledged to adapt its features to comply with the decision. It did, however, stress that the patent infringements represented only a "small" part of the user experience, suggesting that HTC handsets will not profoundly change in light of the ruling.

 

In fact, even though Apple is able to claim victory in this instance, it does not come without an important caveat. That's because the commission overruled an earlier decision that went in Apple's favor in the case, involving another patent relating to how software is organized internally on the handsets. And according to legal experts, it would have been difficult for HTC to adapt its devices to avoid infringing that patent.

 

In a statement, Grace Lei, HTC's General Counsel, said that the company was pleased the commission ruled against Apple on other patents involved in the case. "We are very pleased with the determination and we respect it," Ms Lei remarked.

 

Meanwhile, Apple Spokeswoman Kristin Huguet said: "We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours."

 

Steve Jobs, the former Chief Executive at Apple, famously once said that he was going to "destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product". And given the obvious intensity of the rivalry between the two firms, it is apparent that Mr Jobs' statement was not an exaggeration.

  • Sign in to reply
  • DAB
    DAB over 11 years ago

    Sadly, it was Apples unrelenting effort to keep tight control of their products that nearly killed the company off back in the 1990's.

    I was hoping that they learned their lesson, but so far I don't think so.

    The Intel PC succeeded because it was an "open" system.  The closed mindedness of the IPAD and Iphone will eventually doom them.

     

    Just my opinion.

     

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2023 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • YouTube