Dilbert cartoon unpublished

RE: Dilbert cartoon unpublished

tariq.ahmad — Fri, 03 Mar 2023 22:46:48 GMT

Its hard to unsee things once you’ve seen them. Personally, I don’t respect anyone that speaks disrespectfully of others in a professional setting. A podcast broadcasted to the world is a professional setting. He should of just focused on what he’s good at and what earns him a living and empathize with what most people worry about: paying the bills and taking care of family. He has a right to say whatever he wants but he can’t seriously think anyone else would not of been let go for offending a huge number of potential fans. A company that goes along with that silently endorses his views whether or not that is what they meant to do. Those that are offended can’t respect a company that turns a blind eye either so the question becomes what audience do you want to keep? The information we have access to is unlike anything we’ve ever known. People got away with saying offensive things in the past largely because most people weren’t aware. Its just the world we live in now.

RE: Dilbert cartoon unpublished

wolfgangfriedrich — Wed, 01 Mar 2023 02:26:14 GMT

For all those who just miss the cartoons:

dilbert.com

RE: Dilbert cartoon unpublished

shabaz — Wed, 01 Mar 2023 01:04:06 GMT

Cartoons aside, I'm glad he has been dropped.
It's not a free speech issue as far as I can tell either, since he is free to speak as much as he likes, but in world of capitalism where money speaks, organizations will (hopefully) simply will walk away rather than tarnish their brand. He can stand on a street corner and speak to anyone who wants to listen to him, since he has his free speech, same as anyone. He's no different because he's made millions.
He's stated pretty shocking opinions about black people, and about women, from what little I've heard him speak of.

RE: Dilbert cartoon unpublished

robogary — Wed, 01 Mar 2023 01:00:17 GMT

I swore Scott Adam's had a hidden camera feed from our office space.