<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Speeding up digitalWrite...</title><link>/members-area/personalblogs/b/blog/posts/speeding-up-digitalwrite</link><description>Making digital I/O faster is a frequent topic of discussion on the Arduino developers&amp;#39; list. The digitalWrite function is 20 to 30 times slower than the single instruction that ought to be possible; slow enough to be easily noticeable if you ar...</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Speeding up digitalWrite...</title><link>https://community.element14.com/members-area/personalblogs/b/blog/posts/speeding-up-digitalwrite</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 04:25:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:71d358b2-3be9-41cc-b2d5-4aa89c3d8c35</guid><dc:creator>WestfW</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;In retrospect, this turns out to be pretty silly, because the compiler wll optimize away consant-indexed accesses to static constant arrays as well, and that makes for much less ugly code!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=11921&amp;AppID=293&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>