<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What&amp;#39;s Better than Flyback Converters? Iso-Buck Converters</title><link>/products/manufacturers/analog-devices/b/blog/posts/what-s-better-than-flyback-converters-iso-buck-converters</link><description>When there&amp;#39;s a need to protect sensitive loads and preserve long-term reliability of equipment, you&amp;#39;re likely to see the use of isolated power supplies. Isolation protects against ground loops, which could produce nasty parasitic currents that could </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: What&amp;#39;s Better than Flyback Converters? Iso-Buck Converters</title><link>https://community.element14.com/products/manufacturers/analog-devices/b/blog/posts/what-s-better-than-flyback-converters-iso-buck-converters</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:33:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:063d33d1-97dd-4513-9b87-a20f906b3ad4</guid><dc:creator>rscasny</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article. The comparison between the flyback converter vs iso-buck converter implementation is well worth reading. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=3214&amp;AppID=42&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>