<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/</link><description>In computer science, AI is defined as the study of &amp;quot;intelligent agents.&amp;quot; These devices absorb information about their environment and take actions. Join our AI Group for online learning, discussion of AI development platforms, and more.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237715</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:50643023-1141-45a9-888a-39441fe940b6</guid><dc:creator>vmate</dc:creator><description>Well, your point about reflecting got to me. Indeed, my original response was significantly harsher than it should&amp;#39;ve been, although I didn&amp;#39;t intend any of it towards you, but rather the, let&amp;#39;s just say &amp;#39;lack of pride in their work&amp;#39; of the people making these AI courses. My intention was getting to the point quickly and effectively for someone who&amp;#39;d just skim through these texts: do not use these guides, they are straight out misleading. At least by the end, we&amp;#39;re both better off I guess: hopefully you know not to trust these oversimplified comparison tables the next time, and I learned to think a few more times about what I write, to make sure I don&amp;#39;t come off as inconsiderate and offend someone I didn&amp;#39;t mean to.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Another China AI Company &amp; her Open Source Models which shocks USA AI monopolies</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57145/another-china-ai-company-her-open-source-models-which-shocks-usa-ai-monopolies/237676</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:27aca64b-ee49-450e-ac3f-9cc5fd061e08</guid><dc:creator>HKPhysicist</dc:creator><description>Yes, never ever post any of your ground breaking ideas or contents to public webs or feed them to AI companies. Publish to paper journals first.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Another China AI Company &amp; her Open Source Models which shocks USA AI monopolies</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57145/another-china-ai-company-her-open-source-models-which-shocks-usa-ai-monopolies/237665</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 20:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:e6c6de88-a033-4003-951b-c0a4b6d3e161</guid><dc:creator>cstanton</dc:creator><description>Looks like it&amp;#39;s gaining traction: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy9w4q8pgp0o I&amp;#39;m always cautious with ai sites because of the data they collect and retrain upon.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237661</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:fb77caba-be43-441d-bdac-c957c7a57358</guid><dc:creator>shabaz</dc:creator><description>It&amp;#39;s free ( open source ) so the diagram source should always be usable if the site disappears. But I am interested in other options always, I would prefer more design control personally (I am quite picky about positioning of each element, etc!) hence I mostly (ab)use PowerPoint, but that&amp;#39;s not efficient use of time. A shortcut I&amp;#39;ve used a few times for reverse documentation: run all the test cases, capture the log output, and then run that through a parser to generate such ping-pong/message sequence diagrams, and use that as documentation : ) That&amp;#39;s only possible if the logging has enough information in it of course. For one project that was so useful, a customer saw me using the parser tool to troubleshoot their setup, and wanted it; so from then on we packaged it with the system, and the customer could turn on logging, and run the tool, and easily see what was going on (the diagram showed external inputs arriving into the system, then the few key functions that were executed internally to ripple through to state changes or a response back out, so they could easily see if things were abnormal or not). It was quite handy to see if things were overloaded (e.g. loads of incoming events) or weird state machine changes, etc. This was for the more tech-oriented users (the more normal way was to use third party tools to monitor the entire solution at once, not just one device).</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237660</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:e67b0a47-e706-4114-bc9c-aa52ef589a73</guid><dc:creator>BigG</dc:creator><description>Yep, I tried it although I believe the free option is a time limited trial. Pain. I found https://sequencediagram.org/ to be very handy and works well with AI tools like Gemini/AntiGravity. I just tell it to review my code base and create a sequencediagram script of the sequence process and it does it. Then you just copy the script into the website and out pops a diagram which you can view/download. Very useful.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237659</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:903103a5-a388-4539-b7cc-bfcbb1bc7edb</guid><dc:creator>shabaz</dc:creator><description>Anyone tried Mermaid? It&amp;#39;s an online diagram-drawing tool that accepts text-based input. I mention it because AI can be prompted to generate Mermaid output. Might not be correct always, but it can be useful to get an idea about a body of code that one might be new to. Example screenshot, where the red box is my microcontroller. To do this was quite simple: 1. Install AntiGravity CLI (or use whatever AI you wish; AntiGravity is the consumer way of accessing the functionality in Google Gemini). 2. I used Windows PowerShell. I went to the folder where my body of code was, and ran AntiGravity (by typing agy ) and then just explained in text what I wanted: If you were say using ChatGPT you could have uploaded the files, or perhaps simply provided the URL if the code was on GitHub, and so on. 3. The output was a file called ARCHITECTURE_DIAGRAMS.md 4. I copy-pasted the diagram from the .md file into the Mermaid website . I can use the diagram to refresh myself about how the code is architected. Personally I like drawing my own diagrams because I prefer reducing them for as much simplicity as I can manage, but it is still useful for a quick reference.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237658</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 13:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:afafd9ff-0569-4712-9561-21d9535e1347</guid><dc:creator>bradfordmiller</dc:creator><description>I think it depends on what you are building and documenting. One does not normally implement a compiler and then &amp;quot;discover&amp;quot; what language it compiles. One invents the language first and then writes the compiler. System engineering starts with requirements, not implementations. Design generally should put the human user first, and designs around the user goals and interactions. Then people can worry about how to build that. Lower level things like API documentation should at least start with a design so multiple teams can implement concurrently. It can always be adjusted as issues arise (hey we need to include a FOO in the argument list for these functions because ...). Better editors and implementation languages allow making such changes easy (who-calls).</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237654</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:5b862b92-f8e3-4b06-996b-f5f3bc047988</guid><dc:creator>dang74</dc:creator><description>Thanks. I like how the last row shows what each tool is &amp;quot;best for.&amp;quot; It&amp;#39;s a good way to end the table.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237651</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:3148d2a5-9c2f-4ea0-a40e-6034a4e293f5</guid><dc:creator>colporteur</dc:creator><description>My ire over the dialog has diminished. I&amp;#39;m chuckling to myself as I post this response. I did some reflection before responding. As I get older I find that seems to be more important than just replying. I went to a very good friend of mine with a problem I was struggling with. He listened attentively asking probing questions to fully understand the issue. After a few moments he said, &amp;quot;I have the answer you are looking for.&amp;quot; He then waited before saying, &amp;quot;I just can&amp;#39;t tell you.&amp;quot; Our friendship has grown over the years. We still laugh over that conversation. It took me ten years to respond. &amp;quot;I would never have listened to you, if you did give me an answer.&amp;quot; His response, &amp;quot;I knew that so I wasn&amp;#39;t going to give you an answer anyway.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I appreciate that you didn&amp;#39;t intend it as a personal attack. My concern isn&amp;#39;t your technical disagreement—it&amp;#39;s the language you chose. Calling the table &amp;#39;horrible,&amp;#39; comparing it to astrology, and later referring to AI guides as &amp;#39;completely useless trash&amp;#39; is dismissive rather than constructive. The sources you later provided were far more persuasive than the original wording. That&amp;#39;s the distinction I was trying to make.&amp;quot; I confess I didn&amp;#39;t write the above prose. After reflecting on your response, I thought maybe it&amp;#39;s just me. The reply is an AI&amp;#39;s response to the question, &amp;quot;What is an object of an apology?&amp;quot;I also provided the dialog we&amp;#39;ve had, along with some of my thoughts. I posted the AI response because it reflected my values.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237650</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:abf1fc46-272e-421f-9123-0222808372dd</guid><dc:creator>colporteur</dc:creator><description>I started my technology career in 1981. Entering a site required a sign-in and sign-out. Every action taken on the site or work on the equipment was written in a site logbook. If the was an incident, the log book was the first thing ceased by authorities. 4X4 drawings show system interconnect were the norm. On training course you were given a blank schematic. By the end of the course you would have used up half your colour pencils making notation. Green for receive and red for transmit. The lessons learned in those 18 years never left me. Every job I took after that, I carried a notebook. I typically start a project with what I call the &amp;quot;Napkin Drawing.&amp;quot; The doodles sometimes on a napkin that flush out an idea. I find it really hard to discard the napkin even after the CAD&amp;#39;s are done. Maybe I will miss something I had on the napkin. KiCAD&amp;#39;ing a schematic is time well invested. Up to this point only time has been invested. I have a scope of work, a component list and a way to estimate time. If at this point it never gets built, time can&amp;#39;t be returned. I also discovered once mothballed it take time to recover the knowledge that got me to this point. The older I get, the harder it is to recover. I find sharing project experiences on this site a great way to document.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/237643</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:85d1b49e-7669-4c95-9e48-27465adf7b5d</guid><dc:creator>HKPhysicist</dc:creator><description>Me Too Movement. I am also a minority in 2030. I even feel vomiting when it comes to designing hardware with AI or designing hardware software with AI. Real world hardware design, AI, are actually different domains. As far as I know, the most complicated robotic actions shown on video are actually fine-tuned for many months before they are shown on the TV stage. From this viewpoint, they are just a remote controlled toys with more degrees of freedom. I had Japanese made remote controlled F1 when I was a boy. At that time, we called them remote controlled toys, not AI.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Another China AI Company &amp; her Open Source Models which shocks USA AI monopolies</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57145/another-china-ai-company-her-open-source-models-which-shocks-usa-ai-monopolies/237636</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 07:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:05bce7af-a7fa-462b-af9d-7f50e353f5b2</guid><dc:creator>HKPhysicist</dc:creator><description>I am still learning. I have found their software which is free to download. Browse to https://www.moonshot.ai/ On the top menu, click [Download]. There is a list of software for Desktop. It is their public forum. https://forum.moonshot.ai/</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Another China AI Company &amp; her Open Source Models which shocks USA AI monopolies</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57145/another-china-ai-company-her-open-source-models-which-shocks-usa-ai-monopolies/237627</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 21:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:26b9ee92-e957-4f68-b55f-6b6c65d0b069</guid><dc:creator>cstanton</dc:creator><description>Do you have examples of configurations and tooling to get it up and running?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Another China AI Company &amp; her Open Source Models which shocks USA AI monopolies</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57145/another-china-ai-company-her-open-source-models-which-shocks-usa-ai-monopolies</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:2dc73d17-23fe-411d-aeaf-b410207dc8c1</guid><dc:creator>HKPhysicist</dc:creator><description>Hello Friends, I personally prefer open source software. Also, I heard that Moonshot AI&amp;#39;s newest Kimi K3 model is at the same par as USA closed source company models such as Open AI, Anthropic, etc. So let me introduce her to you and see whether you can find some applications in your own field. https://github.com/MoonshotAI Another goal of open source software is - to balance digital monopoly, to drag down their market price, and increase the marginal profit of hardware products.</description><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/Moonshot%2bAI">Moonshot AI</category><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/Kimi%2bK3">Kimi K3</category></item><item><title>Blog Post: AI Data Centers Could Benefit from Silicon Photonics</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/b/blog/posts/ai-data-centers-could-benefit-from-silicon-photonics</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:b4c01f70-099b-4339-8f27-3af6c766f80b</guid><dc:creator>Catwell</dc:creator><description>Microsoft’s AI infrastructure servers in a data center. (Image Credit: Microsoft ) AI infrastructure is constantly expanding, and efficiently moving data is as important as processing it. That’s where silicon photonics comes into play for next-gen data centers. According to STMicroelectronics, manufacturing, packaging, and testing photonic devices at scale is the next biggest challenge. To address that, the company is ramping production of its PIC100 silicon photonics platform on 300 mm wafers. STMicroelectronics wants to combine optical performance with the manufacturing scale required for producing photonic chips in large volumes. Years ago, STMicroelectronics started developing silicon photonics, and this recent push builds on that earlier work. Its PIC25 platform supported 25-GBaud signaling and 50G-per-lane applications. However, the market wasn’t ready for widespread adoption as the technology launched before it had high demand. Building more data centers has changed that due to growing bandwidth requirements exposing copper interconnect limitations. Although copper works well for short electrical connections, it can struggle to maintain signal quality while controlling power usage when AI systems are scaled. Optical links improve signal integrity, reduce losses, and provide extended range while allowing optical engines to be closer to processors and switch ASICs. The industry is shifting toward near-packaged optics and co-packaged optics. These approaches may create challenges for thermal management, serviceability, and reliability. The company’s plan involves packaging. To make connections shorter between photonic and electronic components, it is working on through-silicon vias (TSVs) for the silicon photonics and BiCMOS platforms. Additionally, it’s pairing laser drives with packaging technologies like photonic chips, MCUs, and control electronics. This supplies more components essential for optical interconnects. Usually, the company doesn’t supply AI data centers. Optical module makers and system companies receive photonic and electronic components. These companies then use those parts to develop transceivers and optical engines. For example, Sicoya recently showcased a 1.6T OSFP optical module based on STMicroelectronics’ PIC100 platform. Designed for AI networking, it uses 8 lanes at 200G/lane and combines photonics integrated circuits (PICs) and electronic integrated circuits (EICs). In addition, Sicoya used die stacking to place the transimpedance amplifier (TIA) atop the PIC, forming shorter connections between the photonic and electronic components. Doing so shortens signal paths and improves integration. With this demonstration, Sicoya showed that optical interconnects don’t just require high performance. Integrating photonic devices, electronics, and packaging them for large-scale production is just as important. Have a story tip? Message me here at element14.</description><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/datacenter">datacenter</category><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/silicon%2bphotonics">silicon photonics</category><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/photonics">photonics</category><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/asic">asic</category><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/innovation">innovation</category><category domain="https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/tags/communication">communication</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/236366</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:fc922afa-69d4-44e0-87d6-d291605faac4</guid><dc:creator>skruglewicz</dc:creator><description>I have taken course on udemy.com for LLMs and Agentic AI. I&amp;#39;ve used every Model and agentic tool available. I use them for Brainstorming Embedded projects using various languages and a wide verify of Evaluation kits. Leaning on AI for design, brainstorming, and vibe coding is a highly effective workflow for me. It is especially useful when prototyping or mapping out the logic for embedded hardware platforms —you can nail down the architecture and flow conceptually before getting bogged down in the syntax. Currently, I use Gemini exclusively for Design, Brainstorming and vibe coding. I have not generated documentation from AI yet . The thread here is interesting and I&amp;#39;m open to checking out the possibilities of using the tools mentioned in the thread.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/236364</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:cd8511fa-aa55-4d33-80a0-b7c9acfb9ad4</guid><dc:creator>BigG</dc:creator><description>Gemini has no problem creating Doxygen style documents. Works really well. No doubt Claude and chatGPT could do similar. https://www.doxygen.nl/</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/236361</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 03:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:d580ded1-903d-4700-976e-e043c58711d0</guid><dc:creator>prajaktaa</dc:creator><description>I really like your point of view. I agree that documentation should start from the beginning of a project instead of being written only after everything is finished. It also helps explain why certain design decisions were made, not just what the final result is. I don&amp;#39;t think AI should make important engineering decisions either. For me, AI is more useful after the planning stage. It can help organize notes, improve writing, create summaries, or make documentation easier to read, while the engineer still makes all the important decisions. I think AI works best as a helper, not as a replacement for the engineer.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/236360</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 03:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:9810ade5-2ef6-4463-b8ae-7e89d5be79db</guid><dc:creator>prajaktaa</dc:creator><description>Thank you for sharing this !</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Which AI tool do you use for documentation?</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/ai-machine-learning/f/forum/57094/which-ai-tool-do-you-use-for-documentation/236359</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 03:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:b631b28a-27ea-4dcc-901f-0e8783ed8f0e</guid><dc:creator>prajaktaa</dc:creator><description>Great actually I have been using Claude for its been now few months yeah it okay but you know I wanted a specific tool for documentation like Mintlify I will try this definitely Thank!</description></item></channel></rss>