<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Xilinx Spartan-7 vs Spartan-6</title><link>/technologies/fpga-group/b/blog/posts/xilinx-spartan-7-vs-spartan-6</link><description>Xilinx Sparta-6 was introduced in 2009 and it was a success. Lower cost on development boards, ICs, and free development tools make it a nice add-on for embedded systems that required more computing power (or multiple IO ports - or interfaces) while </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Xilinx Spartan-7 vs Spartan-6</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/fpga-group/b/blog/posts/xilinx-spartan-7-vs-spartan-6</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:11:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:38c59005-cd32-4abc-a052-22199e9af318</guid><dc:creator>rscasny</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. Just what we were looking to see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Randall&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--element14 team&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=23506&amp;AppID=19&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>