<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Software Defined Transceiver Redux</title><link>/technologies/fpga-group/b/blog/posts/software-defined-transceiver-redux</link><description>My last project:
 Direct Fourier Conversion Software Defined Transceiver 
turned out to be un-workable... I&amp;#39;m going to re-tool with a new board, and decided to start a new blog from scratch.
I ordered this board today:

It uses a KINTEX-7 F...</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Software Defined Transceiver Redux</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/fpga-group/b/blog/posts/software-defined-transceiver-redux</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:44:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:624d4f5b-e4d4-44a4-993a-328c202d93bd</guid><dc:creator>flyingbean</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know how many DSP tiles you would need for the SDR math on a signal FPGA. 4 Transceivers on Kintex 7 can offer you a lot of options for baseband applications. Looking forward to reading your blogs on this topic in 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=27711&amp;AppID=19&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Software Defined Transceiver Redux</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/fpga-group/b/blog/posts/software-defined-transceiver-redux</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:13:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:624d4f5b-e4d4-44a4-993a-328c202d93bd</guid><dc:creator>shabaz</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, just curious, what&amp;#39;s the application?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With such a large bandwidth (the entire HF band it seems?) isn&amp;#39;t there almost a guarantee that the front end ADC will suffer from overload from segments of the spectrum?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be far cheaper to (say) split the spectrum into several (for instance three) chunks, so that each one fits into USB-C bandwidth, and even if there&amp;#39;s concern there could be bits missing in the overlaps, extra in-between chunks (e.g. two chunks in this example) could overlap those three chunks. The idea being that the processing for each spectrum chunk would be done with a separate processor (e.g. normal processor, or perhaps GPU), and the sum of them may be cheaper than the $3K for the FPGA board, plus there&amp;#39;s the significant benefit of pre-ADC filtering per spectrum chunk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s no protocol over HF that can possibly cover a&amp;nbsp;such a large&amp;nbsp;bandwidth (even with frequency-hopping), so only one processor would ever need to process the data for any single data stream, if the problem was split this way into spectrum chunks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=27711&amp;AppID=19&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>