<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Solar Chernobyl Project Opens Solar Farm Next to Disaster Site</title><link>/technologies/power-management/b/blog/posts/solar-chernobyl-project-opens-solar-farm-next-to-disaster-site</link><description>Solar Chernobyl’s Solar Farm covers 1.6 hectares of land, uses 3762 solar modules, and produces 1-megawatts of power. (Image credit: Solar Chernobyl ) During the night of April 26 (1986), workers at the No. 4 light water nuclear reactor at the ...</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Solar Chernobyl Project Opens Solar Farm Next to Disaster Site</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/power-management/b/blog/posts/solar-chernobyl-project-opens-solar-farm-next-to-disaster-site</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:8faa5e9c-7a7a-4420-87ab-8b682264a1a1</guid><dc:creator>muwlgr</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia says that when Chernobyl AES was really nuclear, its power was 4 GWt projected and about 3 GWt achieved&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 MWt is about 3..4K times lower than that. Even 100 MWt is 30..40 times lower. Nuclear energy is hard to beat with solar one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Too bad that its production safety was so neglected then in 1986.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, 1 MWt with expected output of 1024 MWt*h means only 1024 hours of 8760 in a year is adequate for solar power generation. Less than spectacular, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=5696&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>