<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rolls-Royve plans to build SMRs in the UK, replacing nuclear plants by 2029</title><link>/technologies/power-management/b/blog/posts/rolls-royve-plans-to-build-smrs-in-the-uk-replacing-nuclear-plants-by-2029</link><description>Roll Royce’s small modular reactors could provide energy for the UK, replacing traditional nuclear plants by 2029. (Image Credit: Rolls-Royce) Rolls-Royce is well known around the globe for developing aviation, shipping, automobiles, and land po...</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Rolls-Royve plans to build SMRs in the UK, replacing nuclear plants by 2029</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/power-management/b/blog/posts/rolls-royve-plans-to-build-smrs-in-the-uk-replacing-nuclear-plants-by-2029</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:06:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:586d82a3-c2c4-4948-b569-07613cbd0105</guid><dc:creator>paxus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a fluff piece. Basically a press release turned into a news story. Importantly, no specifics about cost are mentioned. Just that it will be cheaper because they are modular.&amp;nbsp; Worth pointing out that Westinghouse (baddest reactor maker in the world) went bankrupt perusing modularity.&amp;nbsp; No SMR has come close to conventional reactor cost per kWh.&amp;nbsp; And conventional nuclear is crazy expensive compared to either renewables or fossil fuel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no new technology in SMR, and for 5 decades the conventional wisdom is bigger reactors lead to economies of scale.&amp;nbsp; SMRs exist as a last ditch effort to save reactor construction companies for their military capacity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They don’t solve the problems of waste, liability, proliferation, accidents and terrorist targets.&amp;nbsp; But we don’t need to get to this part of the list of problems until they make sense financially, which they do not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=8673&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Rolls-Royve plans to build SMRs in the UK, replacing nuclear plants by 2029</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/power-management/b/blog/posts/rolls-royve-plans-to-build-smrs-in-the-uk-replacing-nuclear-plants-by-2029</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 11:06:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:586d82a3-c2c4-4948-b569-07613cbd0105</guid><dc:creator>dubbie</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks an interesting idea. Hopefully a working example is going to be produced in the not too distant future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dubbie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=8673&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Rolls-Royve plans to build SMRs in the UK, replacing nuclear plants by 2029</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/power-management/b/blog/posts/rolls-royve-plans-to-build-smrs-in-the-uk-replacing-nuclear-plants-by-2029</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 21:14:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:586d82a3-c2c4-4948-b569-07613cbd0105</guid><dc:creator>Gough Lui</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Ahh &lt;em&gt;Rolls-Royve and Roll Royce &lt;/em&gt;... the Chinese cousins of Rolls-Royce!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Gough&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=8673&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Rolls-Royve plans to build SMRs in the UK, replacing nuclear plants by 2029</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/power-management/b/blog/posts/rolls-royve-plans-to-build-smrs-in-the-uk-replacing-nuclear-plants-by-2029</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 20:57:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:586d82a3-c2c4-4948-b569-07613cbd0105</guid><dc:creator>three-phase</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;For information on the plant is available from the Rolls Royce website for anyone that is interested;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/nuclear/smr-technical-summary.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc noopener" target="_blank"&gt;Rolls Royce SMR plant&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A 60 year nominal life is interesting, I am working on plants 25 - 30 years old that have had to go through protection and control system upgrades to combat obsolescence, fine for lower risk coal / gas facilities but much more onerous to do on a nuclear facility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder what the staffing requirements will be as well?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=8673&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>