<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.element14.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Reviewing a Fluke VT04 Visual IR Thermometer</title><link>/technologies/test-and-measurement/b/blog/posts/reviewing-a-fluke-vt04-visual-ir-thermometer</link><description>www.youtube.com/watch Thermal cameras can be a huge help around the electronics lab. With the ability to instantly visualize the many different temperatures of an area, there are applications beyond the obvious heat sink performance characterization.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Reviewing a Fluke VT04 Visual IR Thermometer</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/test-and-measurement/b/blog/posts/reviewing-a-fluke-vt04-visual-ir-thermometer</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:34:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:5a05d0b1-0e85-48b4-b2e3-2447721b29e8</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The reason the resolution is not specified is because it&amp;#39;s terribly disappointing. In the VT02, the IR resolution is around 15x15. What the VT series does is it overlays a low resolution IR image over a photo. While this is helpful in certain circumstances, something like the Flir E4 with an 80x60 sensor might be better. I suppose the VT series might be nice, but not at its current price point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=16881&amp;AppID=13&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Reviewing a Fluke VT04 Visual IR Thermometer</title><link>https://community.element14.com/technologies/test-and-measurement/b/blog/posts/reviewing-a-fluke-vt04-visual-ir-thermometer</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:49:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93d5dcb4-84c2-446f-b2cb-99731719e767:5a05d0b1-0e85-48b4-b2e3-2447721b29e8</guid><dc:creator>DAB</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have been disappointed with the lack of a good inexpensive IR imaging camera.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand the limitations of IR sensors, especially in the emissive areas from 3-5 microns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, if the entry level is 900 USD, then there is hope to pick up used devices over the next couple of years at a reasonable cost.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am surprised that the Chinese have not flooded the market with low cost units.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh well, maybe next year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DAB&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.element14.com/aggbug?PostID=16881&amp;AppID=13&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>