SM13117EL and 063934 Not Available

Stocking on newark/Farnell changes all the the time. But we got the parts from the sponsor, not through normal inventory channels. We are rmoveding the Ethernet Lan transformer because we did not receive it. Everything else should be in the kit.

rscasny said:

Ethernet Lan transformer

Thanks for removing from the kit list.

Yes, I understand, but I am ask why abhishek2018  consider it as a good news?

I think this is a bit of a language barrier misaz as I do struggle to understand some of the posts - but I am assuming that abhishek2018 was thanking rscasny for updating the kit list by removing the no-longer-included SM13117EL. I don't think they considered the removal as good news ... the updating of the list would be the good news.

- Gough

misaz said:

why abhishek2018  consider it as a good news

No, not a good news.

I meant, it was confusing, earlier(that time) as it was in the list.

Dr. Gough , you are correct

Gough Lui said:

bit of a language barrier misaz 

Not that much even a barrier, when last time I was pointed out by someone, it was something else.

Gough Lui said:

I do struggle to understand some of the posts

Hope you dont suggest English classes but now at my age, classes even wont work. You can point me,  

Sometimes I think it can be okay to not post in English, and force everyone else to translate it for a change.

Thats why I wasn't posting but you have to bear my ungraduated English for few more months (hope so)

You can point me English rating on 0 to 10.

I believe you still on old blog2 of pp3 

abhishek2018 said:

English rating on 0 to 10.

Calificación en inglés del 0 al 10

تصنيف اللغة الإنجليزية من 0 إلى 10 

דירוג באנגלית על 0 עד 10

cstanton said:

Sometimes I think it can be okay to not post in English

And did you found my videos source.

Now onwards, pls rate my English 0 to 10 on every comment,blog, forum. It will help me improve.

A really good way is to use Google Translate but specifically in the direction of the most literate language to the least literate one (not in the other direction). For example:

This works way better than any dictionary because it's not doing a dictionary look-up of words; it is instead doing a phrase (or fragment of a phrase) search from millions of websites and books, etc. A dictionary would have badly literally translated that phrase to "My English well is?" whereas "Is my English OK?" is more understandable even though that output is still not 100% grammatically correct.

Also, if you install Grammarly in your browser (there is a free account option), it will help like this (I will use your example):

And did you found my videos source.

Now onwards, pls rate my English 0 to 10 on every comment,blog, forum. It will help me improve.

This is what I see on my screen when I type that:

If I click on the blue word it will automatically correct it.

It also helps me. I made many mistakes and Grammarly automatically made recommendations which I accepted by clicking on them. 

A really good way is to use Google Translate but specifically in the direction of the most literate language to the least literate one (not in the other direction). For example:

This works way better than any dictionary because it's not doing a dictionary look-up of words; it is instead doing a phrase (or fragment of a phrase) search from millions of websites and books, etc. A dictionary would have badly literally translated that phrase to "My English well is?" whereas "Is my English OK?" is more understandable even though that output is still not 100% grammatically correct.

Also, if you install Grammarly in your browser (there is a free account option), it will help like this (I will use your example):

And did you found my videos source.

Now onwards, pls rate my English 0 to 10 on every comment,blog, forum. It will help me improve.

This is what I see on my screen when I type that:

If I click on the blue word it will automatically correct it.

It also helps me. I made many mistakes and Grammarly automatically made recommendations which I accepted by clicking on them. 

Just to add to the previous suggestion, also, sometimes things are psychology related, and not directly related to spelling and grammar, i.e. probably, readers have tendencies to better understand information presented in some ways rather than others.

For instance, from my perspective (others may disagree), it's perfectly valid to not write much if the situation doesn't call for it, or use bullet points of (ideally) just three points (more than that might make people switch off, and less than that looks strange), or use diagrams to express things graphically, but still in a left-to-right direction.

Also, I reckon there is no need to explain in words if a well-focussed photo (with annotations on it if required) can explain better. It might not be search-engine-optimised, but then neither is something too wordy perhaps (I don't know). For sure there's a balance.

Another idea (I think Gough effectively said the same thing in a different thread) it's good to hit the delete button sometimes and re-write if something can be expressed in a simpler way, even if it means deleting a lot because often complex things can be reduced to a plain language explanation, at least at a high level. I had a similar problem yesterday. I drafted a long piece of text in Notepad but then deleted it all and instead just showed a zoomed-in-detail screenshot with the important part annotated with a red box, and then the text was simpler.

I like experimenting with stripping detail from diagrams for the same reason. For instance, just from practice, I recognize that I have an overly "busy" diagram and often, I will remove borders, styling, and unnecessary elements, because then there is less on the diagram for the brain to be distracted by. It does depend on the diagram though.

Blog structure helps loads too, e.g. expressing things three times, in three different ways (i.e. introduction, the body, and then the summary), for three times the chance people will understand. Again, I know plenty will disagree with this sort of thing, but I find it valuable (it helps me pull out the key points into the intro and summary too).

shabaz said:

Another idea (I think Gough effectively said the same thing in a different thread) it's good to hit the delete button sometimes and re-write if something can be expressed in a simpler way, even if it means deleting a lot because often complex things can be reduced to a plain language explanation, at least at a high level.

I write that way. My posts or replies will be a "stream of consciousness" first. And I press Reply.
Then I read my own reply back, edit, refine, simplify.

I could do all this before clicking the button. But that's not how my brain works. Somehow I see the flaws in read mode, not in edit mode :)

  Same!

The same thing happens to me, it must have been years of pressing Run instead of Check. So much so that in email I have a rule so that emails are not sent until a few minutes have passed, to give me time to reread as if I had not written it.

"now with attachment" 

Also to add, I really left bothering English grammatical decades ago, like skipping full stop, a ,an etc.  The grammatical like shabaz pointed out is mistake.

And people will take as donot know English.

e14 is the only forum I m active and probably even registered.

Also, I m writting half sentences, as if I write full, gets accused of a writer and write stories, so that factor also appears but here mostly I m writing full.

Also, I m just covering like homework, so answered done (that is, this work done next work)

next question done.