I want a CodeBug

Quite a few projects over the years have suffered from vanishing schematics/source code : (

A few off the top of my head are a so-called open source spectrometer, and a network analyzer.

Same with OpenPi, the "free design files" are not where they state them to be.

Slightly unrelated (since they don't state that schematics/source will be supplied) is fpga4fun.com who

sell effectively dev-boards/educational boards as closed source. It makes them useless in my

opinion.

I suspect that you are right and that the reference to CC in the Kickstarter was simply to attract support by implying community sharing without any intention of actually delivering. The PiFace crew (same as the CodeBug crew) have form with this - they don't publish schematics for the PiFace and have resisted requests to do so, although it is difficult to use these interface parts without detailed circuit information.

However the statement

"so everyone can remix and make their own bugs"

is a clear promise and may be hard to wriggle out of.

MK

I have no problems at all with reverse engineering the board, once I know the pinouts I don't need their frontend and will happily code onto the board directly.

I would rather give them the opportunity to live up to their word, from the contact I have had with them already they are a very committed small team. They may even consider it a release of a burden by making the documentation available.

Just wish they had a forum, however.

It really bugs me !

I don't mind at all if people make and sell proprietary stuff but I get mad about when they pretend that the motive is charitable or educational and apply a little "opensourcewash" to oil the wheels. The educational value of the RPi, Codebug, PiFace etc is massively reduced by the code and hardware secrecy.

MK

Legally (and sadly) I suspect they know they can get away with this, although morally it is wrong. As far as I understand, in UK law, if you state something is "free" (or perhaps a "reward" in Kickstarter-world, then there is no obligation to deliver on it unless there is a contract that says otherwise (and that would need

offer/acceptance and so on, including an exchange of (say) money). So they may be free to revoke it at any time : ( I've not looked at the contract though, which I'm guessing is between KS and the backers, not the project creator and the backers, but I have no idea to be honest : ( since KS appear to magically waive all their obligations once funds have been transferred.

Hi Michael,

the promise is almost perverse Promise that you can use it with your things (you own them so you are authorised to use them ) and make your own bugs. That means "bugs" not "your own code bugs"

Then there is a fact as you mention that this will be attracting without saying false. I frankly disagree this approach but it is. This promise is like "buy the car and you are TOTALLY free to drive it following your own destinations!" Nothing more. As me and my wife are editors, coming from Italy where there is a lobby about the music, video and text copyright we was the first few years ago to publish and distribute commercially a DVD doc CC SA-NC-BY So we are in contact with the CC group by years and have studied almost in depth how this CC licensing system works.

Enrico

There's no attempt to not publish info on Code Bug intended -- we wanted to make sure every single kickstarter backer had received their bug before publishing info on the board etc. Unfortunately we're discovering shipping a few thousand bugs is slightly more involved than we expected. We're also interested when the BBC will release the schematics for their 'open-sourced' micro:bit which was inspired by Code Bug --  How the BBC micro:bit will kick-start a coding revolution (Wired UK)

To be honest, this sentence smells bad

Hi Andrew

Firstly, I am glad that uptake was enough to make it worthwhile for you (I hope).

As the posting and packaging is done by hand, I can quite understand how much work it would be. Be glad the envelopes and stamps are self-adhesive and you don't have to lick them all

My son will be one of the lucky ones to receive the BBC micro:bit, whenever (if ever!) the government follows through with the project. In the meantime he is going to be learning on the CodeBug and other hardware that I have in my stack of boxes of boards.

I'd rather him be able to understand how he has got something working than be able to drag and drop like every other slightly trained drone the micro:bit craze will produce.

As I stated above I don't doubt your veracity about opening the board and code in the slightest, there is just an undercurrent of frustration that we have boards that we can't do much with at the moment. They have massive potential, please don't kill the momentum while everybody is desperate to get to know them. Once they end up in a drawer I fear they will stay there, twinkling away with only odd socks for company which would be a crying shame.

Stick everything on github now(!!) and watch these things take off

Greg

You're lucky. In the US we're still awaiting delivery.