element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
    About the element14 Community
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      •  Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Community Hub
Community Hub
Member's Forum Question of the Month: What is the most important element when choosing a microcontroller to be used in a project?
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Events
  • Leaderboard
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Community Hub to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 23 replies
  • Subscribers 627 subscribers
  • Views 6442 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • ram
  • Processor
  • memory
  • cache
  • microcontroller
  • mcu
  • connectivity
  • arm
Related

Question of the Month: What is the most important element when choosing a microcontroller to be used in a project?

dychen
dychen over 3 years ago

e14 Question of the Month

We're interested in finding out what considerations are most important to you when choosing a microcontroller. Take the poll and let us know, and please tell us why in the Comments section below!

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • DAB
    DAB over 3 years ago

    There are many factors that influence your selection.

    Most important are requirements and cost of the development capability.

    Back when I was doing embedded systems, the cost of the development system often drove the selection, though not always.

    The company wanted to standardize on one processor family, but we kept pointing out that the one they wanted to use would not meet the customers requirements.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • BigG
    BigG over 3 years ago in reply to michaelkellett
    michaelkellett said:
    Over the last 2 years the primary issue has been availability - so many parts are unobtainable.

    I found this is where the use of the Arduino IDE, and similarly with MbedOS (+ few others), has added value, especially during prototyping phase, as in most cases you do not have to change your code base to use a different Arduino compatible MCU if the one you started with is no longer available.

    This is also where C++ classes help too if developing your own library.

    Then, thanks to the ease of KiCAD and EasyEDA, I spend a bit more time coming up with different designs based on these different MCU's.

    Being adaptable is the name of the game now.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Gough Lui
    Gough Lui over 3 years ago

    For our most recent project, conceived in the middle of a chip shortage - it was availability that was the primary element. If you can't buy it, especially for a project to be developed within a month or two ... then it's pointless.

    But in other times, I'd say features/cost matching needs is important. Other times, especially for RF, availability in a module with antenna that is pre-qualified can be a major sway.

    - Gough

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • user4517
    user4517 over 3 years ago

    Is a recent hobbyist I prefer to use the Python programming language. I don't like flavored versions of Python that tie you to a specific IDE or even frameworks that also tie you to specific hardware. Unfortunately, opensource MicroPython can lack support for specific hardware or peripherals. If I was working on more complex projects the C language would be better suited but not for my hobbyist interests.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • dougw
    dougw over 3 years ago in reply to michaelkellett

    Availability and what you have in the cupboard definitely can dominate the decision.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • beacon_dave
    beacon_dave over 3 years ago

    Depends heavily on the project requirements.

    Some other important elements not on the above criteria list might be the quality and availability of supporting documentation, training materials, application notes, code libraries, and also if we are talking board level devices here, then board form factor and power consumption.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • baldengineer
    baldengineer over 3 years ago

    As others have said, the first level requirement is that its capabilities match the application.

    However, most times, there are going to be multiple options, so that is rarely the limiting criteria.

    That said, cost is probably going to be the next level consideration. And that cost has to include development time. In some cases, going with a micro that you know better but has a higher per-part cost might make more sense than just pushing the BOM to the bottom. (On the other hand, on a very high volume project, the additional dev time it takes to learn a new platform might be worth it.)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • michaelkellett
    michaelkellett over 3 years ago

    It just has to be "other".

    Requirements can include things like architecture, dev tool experience/ownership etc.

    For some jobs the price of the device is significant  but for others (eg custom test equipment which I do quite a bit of) then it hardly matters at all. The development cost may run into tens of £k and three boards are built (one for me, one for the application and one spare). The cost of the processor just doesn't feature.

    Over the last 2 years the primary issue has been availability - so many parts are unobtainable.

    MK

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • robogary
    robogary over 3 years ago

    Voted Other - 100% agree with dougw - features need to match requirements. I chose Raspberry Pi Pico in one project over Arduino Nano since qty 2 i2c ports were needed. If a project needs BLE or Wifi, the microcontroller needs that feature. 

    Least effort to implement is pretty significant as well.

    IMHO, cost of the overall project to build is more impact than just the cost of a microcontroller. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • kmikemoo
    kmikemoo over 3 years ago

    #2 Choice:  Familiarity with the IDE is becoming more of an influencing factor.  When the learning curve is more like scaling the Dawn Wall... it's just no fun.  I move on to different things.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
<>
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2026 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube