element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      • Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Embedded and Microcontrollers
  • Technologies
  • More
Embedded and Microcontrollers
Embedded Forum Potting a circuit, how reasonable can this action protect IP?
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Embedded and Microcontrollers to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 473 subscribers
  • Views 1821 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • protecting_ip
  • embedded
  • development
  • patent
Related

Potting a circuit, how reasonable can this action protect IP?

Catwell
Catwell over 15 years ago
It's a cold, cut throat world out there. Designs are stolen left and right. But, how can one protect a circuit design from IP theft and reverse engineering?
I recently developed a system for a company, and they were concerned that the circuit design could easily be stolen. It was true. Just by looking at the PCB you could easily see the layout, the chips used, and component placement. Unfortunately, patenting was not an option due to several factors.
My solution: Pot the electronics. I figure, might as well make it as hard to reverse engineer as possible.
 
 
Has anyone ever de-potted any electronics, and how did it go? From my experience, it is exceedingly difficult and destroys the circuits. But perhaps I am not learned in the art of corporate espionage.
 
 
Is there another way to make it impossible to see, get at, a circuit?
 
 
Cabe
  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 12 years ago in reply to Catwell

    We used sand filled epoxy to pot modules for military applications. We routinely used a "soda Blaster" to remove potting for failure analysis.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 15 years ago
    Now that would be telling! :-)
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • enrico.migchels
    0 enrico.migchels over 15 years ago in reply to Former Member

    Hi Justin,

     

    You sound as a reverse engineer :-)

     

    Thanks for the enjoying reading material. It is helpful.

     

    Best regards,

     

    Enrico Migchels

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 15 years ago

    It is reasonable, however:

     

    1) We just x-ray stuff. Its cheap, easy, and very obvious where all the tracks are.

    2) Depolymerization agent. The potting compound, if not designed to prevent this sort of attack (i.e. just an off the shelf one) will fall apart under this attack.

    3) Heat. Most epoxy resins curl up thier toes after a few jhours of baking. Follow that with a microscope and a set of dental probes....

    4) Microtome. Yup, just cool her down and slice her up.

     

    So that is the bad news.

     

    The good news is you can:

     

    1) Get potting componds with metalic salts (barium, strontium come to mind) that are radio-opaque

    2) Get componds that resist chemical and heat attack (again, they are designed for this)

    3) You can, and it works well as a cheap foil, run a few wires from vias into a birds nest over the board. That defeats all but the most patient x-ray, and

    makes microtoming tedious in the extreme.

    4) Re-etch the componets on the board, or at least grind off all identification.

     

    P.S., a microcontroller is not much of a defense - you have to get to the encrypted ones to be any good against more than a mosest attack.

     

    In reality, is it worth anyone's time to reverse enginbeer your product? Make them good, make them affordable and get brand loyalty. Concentrate on moving forward, and jsut stay one step ahead....

     

    :-)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Catwell
    0 Catwell over 15 years ago in reply to Catwell

    I read that decades ago worked for a company that used printed circuit  boards made on a glass substrate.  (Not fiberglass, real glass, like in  windows.)  The board was mounted in an enclosure that had a  spring-loaded weight that would shatter the board if you opened the box.

     

    A trap might be an even better solution.

     

    C

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Thomas
    0 Thomas over 15 years ago in reply to Catwell

    Hi Cabe,

    Been reading your post on potting. Of the various potting material available, epoxy potting is preferable in view of heat dissipation.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Catwell
    0 Catwell over 15 years ago in reply to Former Member

    Jay,

     

    Electro-plating? Genius idea.

     

    You are right; anything can be reversed. But, I want to stop the casual, average, hapless engineer from easily deducing the design.

     

    The solution is potting. So, What is the toughest potting compound I can get?

     

    Cabe

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 15 years ago
    In the late 1990s I was involved in methods of protecting military chip sets from tampering. These devices were created by the NSA and were used in navigation computers. To protect them, a Plasma Sputtering system was created to coat the bare chips with a layer of metal after it had been directly attached to the circuit. These people were worried about the chips being reverse engineered. Your problem is at the PC Board level. There are potting compounds that may help you but you should know that anything man can make a man can break. The object of protecting something is making it so difficult that the reverse engineer will loose interest in breaking through the protection.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • Catwell
    0 Catwell over 15 years ago in reply to enrico.migchels

    Enrico,

     

    Thank you, those are good suggestions. Some designs I have are not microcontroller based, so I was looking for a way to protect that too.

     

     

    A determined person will break any security. I just want to make it harder to do and stop the casual thief.

     

    Cabe

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • ASano
    0 ASano over 15 years ago
    yes.
    You can incorporate the circuit resins that make viewing difficult PCB. And if someone tries to remove the PCB will be damaged.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
>
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube