Actions
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 48 replies
  • Subscribers 23 subscribers
  • Views 5477 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Disappointed - My opinion

dwinhold

Looking back at the latest design challenge Design for a Cause, I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. Before I continue, congratulations to everyone who competed and completed or tried their best. I always feel if you tried your best and didn't complete you still succeeded. This challenge was for a great cause and potentially help many people for little to no cost. This challenge was even more important as part of the winners prize goes to charity!! I personally put 100% of my effort and knowledge into creating my project as I truly hope one day it will become a reality for the seeing impaired. Now for the disappointing part:

 

16 competitors chosen / Unknown number of applicants

16 kits sent out

8 competitors completed

4 competitors started but didn't continue past a couple of blogs

4 competitors didn't even start

Now this means 50% took the challenge serious and wants to make a difference. 25% started and gave up (Reasons unknown). 25% didn't even start.

 

So what happened? 8 competitors got the kit for free and did nothing for it. They took away 8 others from competing in the challenge who could have made a difference. The kit was worth $250.00USD, so $2000 worth of electronics was wasted. That is wrong and disappointing....

 

 

Please leave a comment about this

 

 

Dale W

Parents

  • It might be helpful to reach out _before the challenge_ to new applicants (ones without track record). While this will not weed out the ones that really want to free ride, but it still might help (it similar to Randall reaching out to road tester after the selection was made - and it resulted in some people not replying any more).

    OTOH when applicants for a challenge do bail on the actual project, it mostly rises the costs. So when looking at the "Design for a cause" challenge, 16 board for 30EUR each were handed out. When half of these board disappear without project, its about the same as when you would run a challenge with 8 boards costing 60EUR each. So the question is: would you run the same challenge under this new assumption? If your answer is 'yes', then half of the applicants dropping out would not be a problem. If your answer is 'no', then more scrutiny is needed (and maybe you select more of the seasoned applicants).

    I personally dropped out of one design challenge (not an E14 one). Back then I was approached by the manufacturer running it (because I had participated in a previous one and was somewhat successful), told him I could have a look but probably would lack the time for a real project. They did send the stuff nonetheless, and in the end I did not have enough time. I considered that fair, but afterwards I carefully considered each challenge based on how much fun it would be (which includes and interesting topic and interesting stuff to work with) and how much effort (vs. the time at hand).

    What I would like to know: is there a difference in drop-out rates depending on the price value? Do people try to finish more when there is something valuable to win?

  • in reply to hlipka

    From what design challenge did you drop out? Where else are there design challenges like these ones?

Reply Children
  • in reply to neuromodulator

    Took me a while to find it in my old email, but I managed to get a press release about the winner: Press Release|NXP

    Back then there were a number of places with design challenges / contests. Mostly manufacturers (I did contests from NXP / mbed, Cypress, Silabs, EnergyMicro, and did actually win some prices :-), but also magazines (I remember EEWeb). But this seems to have died out a little bit - or they are all moving their contests over to E14, as this might give even better reach with less effort for them...