element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Publications
  • Learn
  • More
Publications
Blog Silicon breathes new life into old vacuum-tube technology
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Publications to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: Catwell
  • Date Created: 31 May 2012 6:48 PM Date Created
  • Views 1055 views
  • Likes 1 like
  • Comments 1 comment
  • research
  • test
  • hmi
  • retro
  • Design
  • cabeatwell
  • prototyping
  • measurement
  • eniac
  • university
  • vacuum_tube
  • innovation
Related
Recommended

Silicon breathes new life into old vacuum-tube technology

Catwell
Catwell
31 May 2012

image

Regulator tube in operation (via archive photography)

 

Silicon is breathing new life into the old vacuum tube technology we thought was all but gone. Sure some high-end stereo and guitar amplifiers still use them but this new/old technology is aimed at being used in computers…..again (remember ENIAC?). Vacuum tubes were used to amplify an electrical signal which was pivotal in the development of RADAR, radio, television and even digital computers till the early fifties when the first silicon transistors came on the scene. They could do the same thing as the tubes (rectification, amplification and switching) except they were considerably smaller, cheaper, could be integrated into microchips and longevity dwarfed the tubes. The down side of using silicon transistors is that they’re slower than vacuum tubes (electrons have to move through a solid rather than a vacuum) and are extremely susceptible to radiation (wreaking havoc on the electron flow) which makes using the semiconductors in radiation-rich environments, such as space, a big problem for NASA and the military.

 

image

ENIAC, vacuum tube based computer system from 1946. Weighs 27 tonnes, holding 17,468 tube. (via archive photography)

 

To overcome those short-comings, a team of researchers from the NASA Ames Research Center and the National Nanofab Center in South Korea combined the two technologies into what they call the ‘nano-vacuum tube’. Led by Meyya Meyyappan (NASA), the team developed the tube by ‘etching a tiny cavity in phosphorus-doped (for modulation of the semiconductors electrical properties) silicon’. The cavity is then bordered by three electrodes that form the gate, source and drain which is separated by only 150 nano-meters. The team designed a very tiny vacuum tube that doesn’t need to rely on a vacuum as the electrons have an extremely short distance to travel and, therefore, will not run into any stray atoms along the way. The team found that their new nano-vacuum tubes ran considerably faster (estimated at 0.46 terahertz) at higher voltages (10 volts) over their current silicon cousins, however implementation is still far off as the development of the nano-vacuum tube was primarily a ‘proof of concept’ experiment and compatible technology doesn’t exist yet for their use.

 

Cabe

http://twitter.com/Cabe_e14

  • Sign in to reply
Parents
  • DAB
    DAB over 13 years ago

    Hi Cabe,

     

    I did alot of my early work using tubes.  They are still superior to silicon devices not only for audio, but also UHF and VHF recievers.  The big issue is noise.  At certain frequency/heat areas, the silicon generates a significant noise floor compared to the signal levels.  Tubes can get you upto about 20db improvement and for sensitive applications, that makes them very useful.

     

    If anyone is really interested in good tube technology, go look at what the Russians accomplished with tube technology over the last fifty years.  They did a lot of very good work in improving the technology and the quality of tube devices.

     

    Brings back a lot of memories for me.

     

    Thanks

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • DAB
    DAB over 13 years ago

    Hi Cabe,

     

    I did alot of my early work using tubes.  They are still superior to silicon devices not only for audio, but also UHF and VHF recievers.  The big issue is noise.  At certain frequency/heat areas, the silicon generates a significant noise floor compared to the signal levels.  Tubes can get you upto about 20db improvement and for sensitive applications, that makes them very useful.

     

    If anyone is really interested in good tube technology, go look at what the Russians accomplished with tube technology over the last fifty years.  They did a lot of very good work in improving the technology and the quality of tube devices.

     

    Brings back a lot of memories for me.

     

    Thanks

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube