element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      • Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Publications
  • Learn
  • More
Publications
Blog The Higgs Boson and Revolutions
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Publications to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: gervasi
  • Date Created: 4 Jul 2012 7:23 PM Date Created
  • Views 631 views
  • Likes 1 like
  • Comments 3 comments
  • history
  • physics
Related
Recommended

The Higgs Boson and Revolutions

gervasi
gervasi
4 Jul 2012

It seems every publication has run an article this week on the Higgs boson announcement.  The articles are light on technical details.  I realized why they are vague when I came upon Scientific American’s attempt to explain the discovery to laymen in two minutes.

The concepts are hard to understand, even for someone knowledgeable about the basics of physics. 

 

The thing that stood out most was physicist Rob Roser’s comment that no one would have guessed the discovery of the electron in 1897 would lead to revolutionary technologies.  Although I am not knowledgeable about the Higgs particle, my gut feeling is likening it to electricity is hyperbole.  Electricity was studied long before the charge carrier was identified.  Decades before the discovery of the electron, it was widely recognized that the transatlantic cable would be a revolutionary technology. 

 

It’s still a provocative idea to imagine what if something from subatomic physics did form the foundation of a new technology.  The behavior of subatomic particles is completely different from the physis of the macroscopic world.  This is why pseudoscientific mystics lean on quantum physics to justify their claims.  It is possible that subatomic physics discoveries could lead to high-energy-density power storage or smaller computers.  More likely the advances would come in an area we aren’t even thinking of, such as a high energy propellant that makes possible human space travel throughout the solar system in a reasonable amount of time leading to the establishment of permanent space colonies. 

 

I write this on American Independence Day, and it occurs to me that the US Declaration of Independence was another development whose outcome no one could foresee.  This famous document became part of the basic theory behind democratic governments.  Unlike the discovery of electrons, it did not deal with something that was already in practical use at the time.  The American Revolution had just begun, and many people thought a protracted war could be avoided by coming to an agreement that did not include full independence.  If the war continued, no one knew that the American Colonies would prevail.  If they prevailed, no one knew that several years later the Colonies would pass a constitution that would become a model for countries around the world. 

 

The precursor of information technology, the printing press, made mass literacy and modern democracy possible.  Information technology may turn out to be as revolutionary as the printing press.  No particular discovery such as the Higgs particle is likely to be revolutionary, but we know some discoveries and developments will be.  It’s not bad to suspend disbelief for a moment and consider what if the Higgs particle led to something that revolutionized the world. 

  • Sign in to reply
  • DAB
    DAB over 13 years ago in reply to gervasi

    If my research is correct, then Quantum physics is DOA.  As will be string theory and the multiple dimension ideas.

     

    Why?  Because we do not need them to explain the universe.  Einstein got it right the first time.  His only mistake was his assumptions.  When you look at the big bang from the pure perspective, everything fits for the creation of dark matter and it also accounts for subparticles inside what we currently know as Electrons, Protons and Neutrons.

     

    But I have more research to do, but so far, I can account for all of the "holes" in the current theories.

     

    The Universe is much simpler than most realize.  As it should be.

     

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • gervasi
    gervasi over 13 years ago in reply to DAB

    This reminds me of Thomas Kuhn.  Normal science is working toward finding the details of the current model.  People think the Higgs discovery is step toward a unified theory of forces.  Maybe instead that model will fall apart, and there will be a paradigm shift (using Thomas Kuhn's definition, not the modern cliche). 

     

    I only understand parts of what you say, but it seems like you are saying quantum physics may have a paradigm shift coming.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • DAB
    DAB over 13 years ago

    While interesting, I think the presentation is flawed.

     

    Everyone is assuming that everything we cannot see/detect is bound up by this one particle.

    From my analysis of Einsteins theories, I have concluded that there are an incredible number of particles much smaller than those the current Quantum Mechanics theory is prepared to accept. 

    If you look at what Einstein defined, you will find that there are sub-atomic matter of various sizes and charges that require extremely high energy states to accreate from energy to matter.

     

    Using this idea, you can see how an electron is really a collection of photons, plus the dark matter particles much smaller and lighter than photons.  I call these particles dark-tons as they compose the bulk of the matter in the universe.

     

    Once you accept the composition of the electron, then the Heisenberg uncertainty principle disappears as it is not an issue of finding the exact possition of an electron, because an electron is not a single particle.

     

    Just my opinion,

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2026 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube