Actions
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 14 replies
  • Subscribers 445 subscribers
  • Views 1909 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Question of the Month: In 5 years’ time, do you think component data sheets will be in their current format?

dychen

e14 Question of the Month

As technology advances, component data sheets could evolve into a completely new format.  Take the poll and let us know your thoughts what you think data sheets will look like in the future, and please elaborate in the Comments section below!

Parents

  • I've been used to the PDF format - it's non-threatening, it's easy to understand, it's compatible. But it's not efficient.

    But what's really going to help make life easier for everyone is a standardised database/data file format. Well defined parameters, fields for test conditions/notes, no ambiguity about values that are max/min/typ, and ease of comparison would definitely be aided. Stores like element14 would probably have a lot less work when adding product lines and fewer occasions where their parametric search lacks the data for a certain component or has the wrong value.

    Will this be defined within a 5 year time-window, who knows? But I certainly hope it does. If it integrates well and leverages EDA software, provides footprints and symbols, that would be even more streamlined. Perhaps it might even contain SPICE model data for simulation. But perhaps it's a bit too ambitious as an idea, or manufacturers don't want to be compared "apples-to-apples", and extensibility/feature creep could be an issue too. Perhaps manufacturers find value funneling you to their site, forcing you to use their tools alone so you wouldn't be considering other options ...

    - Gough

Reply

  • I've been used to the PDF format - it's non-threatening, it's easy to understand, it's compatible. But it's not efficient.

    But what's really going to help make life easier for everyone is a standardised database/data file format. Well defined parameters, fields for test conditions/notes, no ambiguity about values that are max/min/typ, and ease of comparison would definitely be aided. Stores like element14 would probably have a lot less work when adding product lines and fewer occasions where their parametric search lacks the data for a certain component or has the wrong value.

    Will this be defined within a 5 year time-window, who knows? But I certainly hope it does. If it integrates well and leverages EDA software, provides footprints and symbols, that would be even more streamlined. Perhaps it might even contain SPICE model data for simulation. But perhaps it's a bit too ambitious as an idea, or manufacturers don't want to be compared "apples-to-apples", and extensibility/feature creep could be an issue too. Perhaps manufacturers find value funneling you to their site, forcing you to use their tools alone so you wouldn't be considering other options ...

    - Gough

Children
No Data