Actions
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 535 subscribers
  • Views 598 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

What industry sector will most benefit from Next Generation IoT devices in the next three years?

vijeth_ds

The Nordic Semiconductor nRF54L Series was created for the next wave of IoT devices, and provides a new multiprotocol radio, advanced security services, and support for new Bluetooth 6.0 features like Channel Sounding. The nRF54L15 SoC is currently the largest device in the new nRF54L Series. It has an efficient and CoreMark design, which prolongs battery life or enables the use of smaller batteries for space-constrained applications. Energy management is enhanced through efficient processing, the use of an ultra-low-power radio, and minimal sleep currents. To learn why nRF54L Series SoC is ideal for Next Generation IoT devices, click here to read the article.

We have a poll for you to let us know what general technologies you feel would most benefit from Bluetooth, thread and matter:

Parents

  • I didn't vote (no option for "other").

    The question is "....

    will most benefit from the Nordic nRF54L15 ..."

    And the answer is complex because the device is so weird !

    Why, why, why have they made a dual processor SOC with one ARM and one RiskV5 core.

    The M33 is a super secure Arm Cortex variant - not a bad choice at all for an IOT device.

    But the second core (The Risk 5) will need  a different tool set and it's really hard to see why you would want it on the same chip.

    It's also quite hard to see why you would want a second M33 core on the same chip.

    Far, far better and more secure to keep all the radio IOT protocol on the M33 in an RF chip and have the second core (if you need it) on a separate chip.

    I expect that there is some reason for doing it the way they have, usually when odd chips like this appear its because a customer or special application worth big money wants it. But I don't know if that's the case here - so how could I cast a rational vote ?

    So I can't see this chip benefiting any one much - I look forward to Nordic proving me wrong !!

    MK

  • in reply to michaelkellett

    I agree. The headline is fairly general (and I would have answered the energy sector), but the more specific poll is really just too specific to address. I get the feeling someone is expecting us to be their market research department.

  • in reply to bradfordmiller

    I had assumed it was to permit migration from ARM to RISK V without having to deal with new hardware.

    Possibly signaling that there will be (lower cost?) future parts that are RISK V only.

    The new Pi Pico 2 pulls a somewhat similar stunt, although in that case execution is not concurrent.

Reply Children
No Data