Technical Crutches - good or bad or necessary evil?

Thank you for this post Doug.  I have mixed feelings about AI.  There are some days where I use ChatGPT entirely too much.  I don't use it for code generation and I don't use it to write things like reports.  Generally I use it to...

1) Overcome knowledge gaps

2) Get a quick answer to a problem

3) Internet search

It could be said that I underutilize AI and don't fully unleash its full productivity potential... I resist this because I still want to have that sense of personal satisfaction and accomplishment that comes from doing your own work. Perhaps this is setting myself up to be left in the dust... but I am far enough into my career that I can probably afford to do this... but time will tell.

Another negative impact of the internet is that I read fewer and fewer books.... and it takes me much longer to finish them.

Thank you for this post Doug.  I have mixed feelings about AI.  There are some days where I use ChatGPT entirely too much.  I don't use it for code generation and I don't use it to write things like reports.  Generally I use it to...

1) Overcome knowledge gaps

2) Get a quick answer to a problem

3) Internet search

It could be said that I underutilize AI and don't fully unleash its full productivity potential... I resist this because I still want to have that sense of personal satisfaction and accomplishment that comes from doing your own work. Perhaps this is setting myself up to be left in the dust... but I am far enough into my career that I can probably afford to do this... but time will tell.

Another negative impact of the internet is that I read fewer and fewer books.... and it takes me much longer to finish them.

dang74 said:

Another negative impact of the internet is that I read fewer and fewer books.... and it takes me much longer to finish them.

That seems to be quite common with school kids these days (at least based on my own). They've grown up on TikTok and YouTube videos. It tends to be their mode of choice rather than a good book. It's a real battle convincing otherwise.

There is no question that the Internet and AI provide a giant boost to productivity, and there is no question that AI can create new material.

One of the things I find most enjoyable is creating - which often involves transplanting a concept from one field and applying it to a completely different field or making linkages between different ideas where no linkage existed in the past. This type of creativity requires knowledge, it simply cannot occur without knowledge of things that might be linked, and the more knowledge we have the more new linkages we can dream up. AI can do this too, but if humans want to continue to be creative (and we do) we need to continue to learn and exercise the creative process. If it isn't exercised, it atrophies.

Of course people use the internet to learn things - it is spectacular for supplying things to learn. We just need to remember learning is a crucial part of creative performance. Hopefully AI offloads time-consuming tasks and provides us more time to learn.

There is something about reading books that really allows imagination to flourish, where video is coming at you with so much information, there may not be enough time for imagination to fully develop offshoots. It is important to exercise our imaginations and let them explore the tendrils that grow from material we read.

dougw said:

There is something about reading books that really allows imagination to flourish

Perhaps partly due to the linear delivery of text. The information is being drip fed to you in the order that the author has presented it. The brain has to store it word by word, paragraph by paragraph, whilst its auto-predict (imagination) anticipates what's coming next trying to build up the incomplete mental image.

With a photograph, all the information is available at once and it's up to the viewer to consume it in which order they want. However, a lot of people miss things in photographs, or misinterpret them due to bias. Also there is no creator confirmation of what it is that you are looking at. 

dougw said:

where video is coming at you with so much information

With a video you can have multiple events occurring simultaneously like the flash and the bang of the explosion and the screams and alarms all going off together. Or something more subtle like the simultaneous body language between two subjects. These are difficult to convey in a text based format but are more like the way most perceive the real world with our eyes and ears.

There are strengths and weaknesses in each format.

dougw said:

It is important to exercise our imaginations and let them explore the tendrils that grow from material we read.

I recall back at school, most of the school books contained printed text with little in the way of illustrations or photographs. I'm not sure that was always a good thing, as it lacked real-world context to help steer the imagination.

From what I recall, very few school kids were particularly avid book readers. It took me a while to get into them but perhaps that was mainly because there was a lack of non-fiction material available.

In some respects, the presentation format of educational content on YouTube is little different than that of the lecture, except that you can pause/rewind/etc. It's still a pretty poor example when it comes down to multimedia content delivery.

Well said.... and I agree that we have to find the time to practice our creativity.