element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Personal Blogs
  • Community Hub
  • More
Personal Blogs
Gough Lui's Blog Molex Antenna Mod on the IDT SDAWIR Evaluation Kit
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: Gough Lui
  • Date Created: 30 Nov 2019 9:46 AM Date Created
  • Views 1872 views
  • Likes 9 likes
  • Comments 3 comments
  • mod
  • modification
  • molex
  • 6lowpan
  • makevember 2019
  • evaluation kit
  • radiocontrolch
  • makevember
  • rfradiofrequencych
  • radiofrequencych
  • radio
  • 868mhz
  • idt flow
  • rf
  • evaluation board
  • antenna
  • idt
  • 900mhz
  • sensor
  • ISM
  • ism_band
Related
Recommended

Molex Antenna Mod on the IDT SDAWIR Evaluation Kit

Gough Lui
Gough Lui
30 Nov 2019
image

RF (Radio Frequency)

Enter Your Project for a chance to win a Spectrum Analyzer for the Most Innovative RF Project!

Back to The Project14 homepage image

Project14 Home
Monthly Themes
Monthly Theme Poll

 

Seeing as I had a little more time free on my weekend, I was thinking of what I could do with the Molex Antenna Sample Kit that tariq.ahmad sent my way. I would feel too guilty if I didn't at least try to use one of them. Then it struck me - I reviewed the IDT SDAWIR Wireless Flow Rate, Humidity and Temperature Sensing Evaluation Kit based on a 6LoWPAN module operating at 868/915MHz back in May 2019, so perhaps this would be a good excuse to try out an antenna as part of another entry into the November 2019 RF Project14 contest.

 

Why Modify?

While reviewing the IDT SDAWIR Evaluation Kit, I discovered the ZWIR4512 6LoWPAN modules did not achieve a decent transmission/reception range. Rather than the expected 30m or so, I got a range of just 4m despite ensuring the band was quiet and free of interference.

imageimage

Looking at the kit, I strongly suspected that the design of the hub PCB was the cause - a printed trace antenna on such a small size with poor manufacturing seemed to be a potential compromise that would cause the system to perform poorly. While other RoadTesters seemed to have better success with their kits, I found a system loss of about 60dB with the hub and cube located side-by-side.

image

Perhaps the design of the cube was also at fault, using a relatively small-size of SMD antenna. The cube module does have provision for an external antenna to be snapped onto the connector, but the board itself looked so neat and the antenna seemed to be proper, that I believed the fault was more probably in the hub PCB rather than the cube.

 

The process of modification would replace the printed trace antenna with a flexible self-adhesive antenna from Molex, specifically the 105262 ISM 868/915MHz antenna included with the sample kit. This would provide a larger antenna with some separation from the PCB and metal shielding components which might affect the signal radiation pattern and antenna efficiency. Hopefully this will provide a noticeable increase in signal strength and range. As the board did not have a provision for an external antenna and I didn't know whether it was tuned for a 50-ohm antenna, I took a gamble and cut the traces to the existing antenna, scraping off the solder resist and soldering in the coax directly to the PCB.

 

The worst outcome would be that I might potentially break the unit - but seeing as it doesn't operate legally in Australia due to the pre-set frequencies being outside our ISM band allocation, it would not be a big loss to me.

 

Video

Rather than try to explain the process using a wall of text, seeing as I have to produce a video anyway, I tried to show exactly what I did (albeit with a bit of a speed-up) along with the results:

You don't have permission to edit metadata of this video.
Edit media
x
image
Upload Preview
image

 

Results

imageimage

The result is a rather strange looking antenna jutting out of the case - but this is perhaps one of the biggest advantages as it is a larger antenna and is now spaced away from the metal that could affect its performance.

image

The resulting graph shows a marked improvement in RSSI - about 9dB at the closest point, but ranging from about 6-10dB of improvement. Range has also doubled, but it seems that the cube has some non-linearity with low RSSIs or it may reflect some issues with the radiation pattern in the antenna used in the cube or multipath interference from the testing environment. Regardless, this magnitude of improvement is quite significant even if it seems small numerically - but the system still performs very poorly as it doesn't reach the 30m I would have estimated based on a quick link budget calculation, and the system has about 51dB of loss when just sitting side-by-side which is way too high. This suggests that perhaps my 6LoWPAN kit may have been damaged from the outset - perhaps ESD had fried the RF output stage on the hub itself, resulting in lower transmit power than expected based on datasheet values. This is perhaps something I won't know for sure unless I get out a power divider and use my spectrum analyser with some testing mode on the module (but it's not equipment that I have at present). Regardless, it still shows how a better antenna can make a significant difference.

 

Conclusion

A wireless system's "eyes and ears" are its antennas. Improving the antenna performance of your device is the best form of amplifier you can have. Often, due to form factor requirements and cost reductions, compromise antennas are used which negatively affect performance. In this case, a modification was made to the IDT SDAWIR Evaluation Kit's hub PCB to utilise a larger external flexible antenna from Molex which provided a doubling of range and improved RSSI readings by about 6-10dB. As usual, with all wireless systems, it is also important not to neglect the "other side" of the link - in this case, no modifications were made to the cube and better results may have been obtained if it too had a better antenna with some space between the antenna and potentially interfering metal objects.

 

That being said, November has pretty much come to an end in Sydney - I've been quickly writing this one up so that I could still call it Makevember ... will I have any more time for RF-related shenanigans? Stay tuned to find out.

 

In the meantime - I don't normally do videos, so this has been a bit of a fun project for me to try and find ways to make videos that hopefully are decent given the minimal investment. For such short projects, editing often consumes more time than the project itself and the bandwidth costs of uploading video are rather big too (as I'm on LTE-only in this area and my adventures with Azure Sphere and Visual Studio really cost me plenty already). As a result, I tend to prefer writing wordy posts with images - should I do more videos going forward? Any feedback on these posts and videos would be much appreciated!

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • shabaz
    shabaz over 5 years ago +2
    Hi Gough, It's great to see the massive improvement with the antennas. I remember one of the worst being the OpenPi, with a disregard by the manufacturer, "Wireless Things" for fully reading the datasheet…
  • aspork42
    aspork42 over 5 years ago +1
    Nice job! I was thinking of doing the exact same since I have both the same kits. Mine did seem to have better transmission from the start though.
  • Gough Lui
    Gough Lui over 5 years ago in reply to shabaz +1
    Wow. I've got to say - that's a shocking design to say the last. If we consider that most "mini" wireless dongles may have cheap, printed trace antennas which could be <2dBi of gain and have some uneveness…
  • Gough Lui
    Gough Lui over 5 years ago in reply to shabaz

    Wow. I've got to say - that's a shocking design to say the last.

     

    If we consider that most "mini" wireless dongles may have cheap, printed trace antennas which could be <2dBi of gain and have some uneveness in their radiation patterns, to stuff if near a ground plane is going to make things so much worse. Aside from absorbing/reflecting signal, it will also change the impedance characteristics of the antenna. Definitely a key design where turning something 90 degrees and having it hang off the edge of the board would be better - but I guess that's why there are extension cables or external antenna connectors + pigtails + external antenna sockets on some products to really optimise the RF performance. Even if they cleared the ground plane, I'm not sure they could clear enough of it - and the FR4 dielectric of the PCB could still have an impact on antenna performance.

     

    Perhaps the only exception I could think of would be if you had a device that had a 1/4 wave antenna sticking straight up out of the ground plane - then the ground plane could be of use.

     

    I suppose I could have done better if I didn't strip as much of the centre conductor away and found a ground point closer to the transmission line - less "adhoc" routing would mean less impedance mismatch losses and radiation leakage (which could manifest itself as multipath/destructive interference).

     

    - Gough

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 5 years ago

    Hi Gough,

     

    It's great to see the massive improvement with the antennas.

    I remember one of the worst being the OpenPi, with a disregard by the manufacturer, "Wireless Things" for fully reading the datasheet of the wireless parts they were using.

    image

    image

    It made me realise some boards are a world apart from what should get implemented : (

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • aspork42
    aspork42 over 5 years ago

    Nice job! I was thinking of doing the exact same since I have both the same kits. Mine did seem to have better transmission from the start though.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube