element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Personal Blogs
  • Community Hub
  • More
Personal Blogs
Gough Lui's Blog Tek 2-Series MSO In-Depth – Ch1: Market Survey
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: Gough Lui
  • Date Created: 14 Oct 2023 9:36 AM Date Created
  • Views 1341 views
  • Likes 9 likes
  • Comments 5 comments
  • Mixed Domain Oscilloscope
  • mixed signal oscilloscope
  • mdo
  • tektronix
  • MSO22
  • mso24
  • mso
  • dso
  • portable oscilloscope
  • tablet oscilloscope
  • oscilloscope
  • tek
  • digital storage oscilloscope
Related
Recommended

Tek 2-Series MSO In-Depth – Ch1: Market Survey

Gough Lui
Gough Lui
14 Oct 2023
Tek 2-Series MSO In-Depth – Ch1: Market Survey

First of all, let me begin by thanking element14 and Tektronix for selecting me as the lucky RoadTester for the Tektronix 2-series MSO. This is a product I’ve been looking at since launch, having attending the launch event, as there is more than meets the eye. In this first blog post, I’ll try to explain just how the Tek 2-series MSO fits into the oscilloscope landscape (both within Tektronix and overall) and compare it with a slew of market offerings. This will allow us to understand why the Tek 2-series MSO is an interesting product.

So, You’re Looking for an Oscilloscope?

For any budding electronics enthusiast, educator, engineer or repairer, test gear is a vital part of getting things done. Usually one would acquire a multimeter first, perhaps a power supply after, before graduating to an oscilloscope. Having an oscilloscope is vital for visualising changing signals of any sort and is often a useful tool to troubleshoot problems with communications, power and lower-frequency radios. This is usually a fairly sizeable purchase, so there is an incentive to make the best choice.

In fact, there may not be a better time to buy an oscilloscope, as the market has (over the past half-a-decade) been facing a transformation. Over time, the entry-price has been reducing as many Chinese brands have entered the market, undercutting the traditional brands by a significant margin. Front-end technology has improved and higher-resolution/higher-rate analog-to-digital converters are now available for reasonable money. Deeper memory enables more in each acquisition with the power to zoom in even further. Protocol decoding, FFT and arbitrary waveform generators give the oscilloscope the ability to take over some of the roles of a protocol analyser, spectrum analyser and frequency response analyser. Screens have been getting bigger and of higher resolution for more clarity, while touch-screen user interfaces have matured and operation has become more intuitive. Finally, connectivity is now considered standard and remote-control operation is no longer considered a luxury.

Say Hello to the 2-Series

The Tektronix 2-series MSO is the latest to join Tektronix’s line-up and rather than pushing the envelope at the top, they created a unique offering that extends the MSO/MDO family down.

image

The 2-series is a portable mixed-signal oscilloscope that is touted as a “no compromise” little-brother to the other MSO/MDOs. It shares a user interface that is substantially the same to that used in the higher-end MSO/MDOs, while having quite a lower entry cost. It occupies a space between the TBS2000B which is a more basic DSO and the 3-series MDO which is a more sophisticated offering with a hardware spectrum analyser. Furthermore, it shouldn’t be written off as being lesser just because it is portable, as it is very much still a match for bench-top units and has bench-top aspirations from the outset with a desk stand and VESA mount capabilities. Only when equipped with the optional hot-swappable dual-battery pack does it become truly self-contained for use in the field. There is also the option for a carry bag, rubberised case and kickstand for toting the unit around, as well as a rack-mount option for fixed use.

image

A look at the specifications reinforces the sense that the 2-series MSO is more of a “hybrid” offering that brings more of the bench-top models into the portable world, while bringing some of the compactness of portability and lightness into the bench-top world, and not suffering any critical compromises in the process. It also seems to be a good replacement for the TBS2000B bringing a modern user experience, with a starting price not much more. It does also have a price ceiling that is quite high (indicating the availability of many options and upgrades) which allow the 2-series MSO to grow with your needs simply through applying license key codes. Compared to the 3-series MDO, it is clear that the 2-series is not quite as big or capable, as the name would suggest, but still has most of the features.

Perhaps the key downsides of the 2-series MSO are the low waveform update rate claimed in the datasheet and the significantly-shorter 1-year warranty by default (which can be extended at further cost).

Market Comparison

To compare the 2-series with the market is a little tricky, as the target user for a 2-series could have completely different motivations. As a result, I’ve tried to make comparisons based on several different types of users I could foresee considering the 2-series. In the process, I have compared a whopping 29 models of oscilloscope, taking a few days of work to compile.

As a disclaimer – all comparisons are based on extracted datasheet figures which do not cover all aspects of each oscilloscope. It is not possible, given the time, to compare every model or feature available. While the comparison is provided in good faith, errors and omissions may occur. Users should verify the specifications of an instrument and do their own research prior to purchase. I cannot be held responsible for any damages which are incurred, no matter how they are incurred, from the use, misuse or inability to use this information.

The first market I foresee for the 2-series is for those who are looking for a basic bench oscilloscope – for example, in undergraduate electronics laboratories or for a home lab.

image

The bench-top market is perhaps the most competitive, as it has been the most developed. There are no shortage of options to choose from, although in this case, I have taken the liberty of not only including “2”-tier units but also “3”-tier units in this comparison to provide better context, as the top-spec 2-series MSO reaches into “3”-tier pricing.

When it comes to “2”-tier products, the 2-series MSO definitely matches or exceeds all on bandwidth, display size/resolution, triggering and weight. It also scores pretty well on connectivity and has a VESA mount option which no other products appear to have in this class. The availability of AWG and pattern generator options compare very favourably, although having the serial decode features all being added-cost options is a negative. Software support is a key positive, however, the default warranty is the shortest in its class. Similarly, the 8-bit vertical resolution is very ordinary, with some competitors offering 10-bit. The memory depth of 10Mpt is a bit of a wash either way.

Comparing with “3”-tier and above, the 2-series cannot reach the 1GHz bandwidth or the deep memory depths available. Many have more protocol decode features and some even offer USB 3.0 capabilities.

With regard to pricing, Tektronix has historically not been one to underprice their products. This time around, the aggressive base pricing is clearly evident but so is the high ceiling. Perhaps such highly-specified 2-series MSOs would mostly appeal to those who value the portability or flexibility of the 2-series, while those chained to the bench may find a “3”-tier product offers more versatility for not much more. That being said, the pricing does still mostly compete with the traditional established brands, with Rigol clearly undercutting the competition quite significantly (although, at some cost to features).

Another market the 2-series MSO may appeal to is that of the handheld market. This is a market served traditionally by smaller, portable, battery-powered oscilloscopes that sometimes have very basic specifications.

image

Comparing with handhelds, the 2-series MSO is definitely the more capable unit. As a larger unit, it probably won’t work all that well hand-held as the weight is 3.2kg with one battery and it doesn’t offer the isolated channels that some of the higher-end handhelds do. However, in-return, there is entry-level bench-top grade performance. The best handheld (R&S RTH1000-series) has a price that is a bit more than the 2-series MSO while offering a competitive bandwidth and better ADC. However, the memory depth, screen, digital capabilities and lack of output generation is a key downside. The next-best from Keysight is inferior in practically all respects. That being said, this market has seen quite a few entries from low-cost Chinese brands such as Fnirsi, Owon and Siglent, with some products costing not much more than a decent digital multimeter. However, such products are very compromised in their capabilities and getting useful information from them could prove frustrating.

For those who don’t want to go with the limitations of a handheld, it is customary to instead use a laptop computer with a USB-connected oscilloscope. Such set-ups are relatively common amongst hobbyists as they can offer a lot of features for a relatively small investment, as the computer provides the display, processing and storage. However, such set-ups do have their own caveats as well, as higher-end USB-oscilloscopes often cannot be run entirely on bus-power and there can be safety issues regarding grounding. Nevertheless, this market is relatively small with regards to reputable manufacturers.

image

I made a comparison with the PicoScope 5000-series as the highest-end unit that can run at least partially on USB-host power. This at least means that it is possible to run fully battery-powered, relying on the laptop’s batteries. There is a higher-end model as well, however, I did not include it. Unfortunately, all other candidates identified require AC power.

When compared with the USB products, the 2-series MSO is not quite a clear winner. The PicoScope has less bandwidth and shorter AWG memory but more flexibility in resolution, more memory depth, an extensive array of free decoders, lower price ceiling and longer warranty. The rarely-seen Keysight offering is very expensive, but offers more bandwidth. The other options from Hantek are much cheaper “toys” by comparison, with significant limitations but may work for those with a very limited budget.

Finally, we have the portable market. This is a new market and includes products which are roughly “tablet-shaped”. Some manufacturers like to call them “tablet oscilloscopes”, even though they are a bit chunkier. Nevertheless, this is a form-factor that is mostly occupied by innovative Chinese vendors, with no established vendors identified making such products.

image

By comparison, the 2-series MSO is a lot more expensive than most of the portable units out there – but that is to be expected since the portable units don’t come from a company with such pedigree. That being said, the 2-series does show its superiority in terms of bandwidth, sample rate and AWG/pattern generator option. It is equal best when it comes to screen. As for connectivity and triggers, it is mostly a wash. As for weights, it seems all units are roughly similar. Key downsides of the 2-series are again, the warranty, waveform update rate and the fact decoders are all added-cost options. Another is the availability of higher-resolution or flexible-resolution features in some of these portable units which add versatility.

This makes it a difficult market to compete in – the competition is very much lower in price and while the Tek 2-series MSO does lead in some areas, the lead may not be enough to convince everyone to choose Tek over someone else, at least, on paper. While Tektronix does have an unimpeachable reputation to protect and the 2-series does have a lot to offer which isn’t captured here or isn’t entirely obvious at first glance, I have a feeling that this is a bit of a tough sell.

Will the Tek 2-series MSO inspire other reputable manufacturers into this portable market? I don’t know for sure, but I suspect many are watching to see if it is a success or not before deciding to make a move.

Conclusion

The oscilloscope market has been seeing many innovations in the last few years, with more features and capabilities arriving at ever-lower price-points.

The Tektronix 2-series MSO is the latest addition to their MSO/MDO family which takes things in a new direction, focusing on portability rather than on increased performance. Being the “baby” of the numbered-series, it slots between the TBS2000B and 3-series MDO. While the oscilloscope itself is smaller, lighter and more compact, it is still very competitive with other “2”-tier oscilloscopes and tries to be a “no compromise” solution.

Because of this, it is a bit of a “jack-of-all-trades”, shipping with a desk stand and having VESA mount holes as standard, it is definitely at home on the bench. With the optional carry bag, kickstand and rubber surround, it is also comfortable being taken around as a portable unit. Finally, with the option for a dual hot-swappable rechargeable lithium-ion battery pack, it can even substitute for handhelds as a self-contained solution in field-service scenarios and aspire to displace the venerable laptop and USB-oscilloscope.

As part of my market survey, I compared 29 models across bench-top, handheld, USB and portable market segments. Overall, when compared to bench-top units, the Tektronix 2-series MSO fared well with regards to its bandwidth, number of channels, AWG/pattern generator option, display size/resolution, triggering, weight and software support.  There were many areas where the 2-series was neck-and-neck including connectivity, memory depth and protocol decode support. However, the 1-year standard warranty is a notable exception, as is the 8-bit resolution (as others do offer 10-bit or flexible resolution). The fact that many features (such as all protocol decoders) are options will increase the price for a functional configuration and thus the base-price may be somewhat misleading. While the unit is definitely a lot less compromised compared to most handhelds, it is bulkier, heavier and does not offer channel isolation. Additionally, while it does leave most lower-end USB and tablet oscilloscopes in the dust, it is not head-and-shoulders above all of them.

As a result, it’s not quite a sure-win as the demands are different in each market and the specifications are often neck-and-neck. It must be remembered that the portable market is new and full of low-cost Chinese competitors, albeit without the reputation that Tektronix has. The 2-series MSO is definitely an interesting hybrid product that seeks to bring more of the capability of bench-top models into the portable world, while bringing some of the compactness of portability and lightness into the bench-top world. It represents the first foray for a reputable manufacturer into the portable market and I’m sure others are probably watching it closely to see whether it appeals or not. But even if it doesn’t, this seems a worthy upgrade to the TBS2000B and brings the familiar touch-based UI/UX of the bigger MSO/MDO to an even more affordable entry price point.

---

This blog is a part of the Tektronix 2-series MSO RoadTest Review.

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 1 year ago +1
    Very useful comparison. I guess the markets for Tektronix and Siglent/Rigol are different but it shows how much the latter are offering for the money for those who aren’t after the names. It’s hard to…
  • scottiebabe
    scottiebabe over 1 year ago +1
    Yay! A Gough Lui dot com review! I am eager to hear your thoughts on this portable oscilloscope.
  • genebren
    genebren over 1 year ago +1
    Thanks for the through market comparison charts! I have been looking into some of the lower cost options to replace my primary workhorse scope, a Tektronix TDS 2014B that I bought about 16 years ago. Some…
  • michaelkellett
    michaelkellett over 1 year ago

    Interesting stuff -it spurred me to look at the Rigol DHO 800/900 scopes (which I hadn't noticed until now). I already have a Rigol HD4204 and the Rigol DHO924S pretty much matches it in everything (and has some extra features) for about 1/3 of the price.

    The Rigol is an astounding offer for the money and for pure scope performance in a tiny package at up to 250MHz is remarkable , offering true 12 bit ADC with low noise and really fast update rates - with the bonus of USB C power. The battery pack for the Tek MSO 2 series is about the same price as the whole Rigol scope.

    Keen to read your final review to see if anything pops up to persuade me to part with the dosh for the Tek.

    MK

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • genebren
    genebren over 1 year ago

    Thanks for the through market comparison charts!  I have been looking into some of the lower cost options to replace my primary workhorse scope, a Tektronix TDS 2014B that I bought about 16 years ago.  Some of the new portables are looking pretty good to me right now.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • scottiebabe
    scottiebabe over 1 year ago

    Yay! A Gough Lui dot com review! I am eager to hear your thoughts on this portable oscilloscope.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Gough Lui
    Gough Lui over 1 year ago in reply to Andrew J

    Thanks for the comment Andrew J !

    I know many manufacturers would rather I not utter the name of various Chinese instrument manufacturers, but the truth is that the market is flush with low-cost options with varying degrees of compromises. However, the popularity of such lower-cost options is not for nothing - they do offer a lot for the money even if the build and UI aren't always everyone's cup-of-tea. Sometimes their design may be lacking in ways which are not immediately apparent or captured by the datasheets. This can result in less accuracy over time or downright failure due to design issues. Support is sometimes an issue too when things go wrong - a lack of hardware repairs, possible firmware bugs, etc. We must acknowledge the fact that there may be more to the purchase decision than just the specifications, but depending on the consumer, they could be perfectly acceptable tradeoffs.

    That being said, I agree, the maximum price is quite scary. But traditionally, having been in charge of procuring a few oscilloscopes for work, I know from the quotation process that Tektronix usually does charge a premium. Their brand recognition and reputation is above all - although I won't make any judgement here about whether this is deserved or not. Perhaps they feel it is justified, as their mix of functionality, portable form-factor and brand reputation is unique.

    The warranty is a stand-out issue - I suspect this is purely because they would expect those who purchase such a unit to consider paying for the warranty upgrade. Specifically R3 brings it up to 3-years, R5 up to 5-years with higher-end service options such as T3 and T5 offering "total protection" and C3/C5 offering calibration service with D1/3/5 offering calibration data report as well. The latter features you won't find offered on the cheaper brands and may be necessary in a professional work context. But doing this also lets them advertise a lower price, while knowing that most consumers will pay the upgrade.

    Another potential reason is simply the understanding that as a portable unit, it's more likely to suffer stresses (mechanical, environmental) that ordinary bench-top units wouldn't necessarily be subjected to. As a result, perhaps the 1-year default is them being a little cautious, knowing such units may see abuse.

    Of course, this is just my opinion on the matter. There may also be other things which I don't know about ...

    - Gough

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 1 year ago

    Very useful comparison.  I guess the markets for Tektronix and Siglent/Rigol are different but it shows how much the latter are offering for the money for those who aren’t after the names.  It’s hard to imagine why anyone would be speccing one of these up to the max price as that seems crazy money to me.  The warranty seems strange as well, it always feels like either a lack of faith or a disdain for customers to offer the barest minimum for what is marketed as a “premium” product/brand.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube