There is a big debate occuring now due to changes to the Eagle CAD licensing policies.
I am hearing:
- the old Eagle licence policies are more attractive than the new policies
 - low cost crippled versions are not very attractive as they ultimately result in paying full price or wasting the learning curve investment
 - there are limits to what makers are willing to put up with, whether it is performance, cost or learning investment, but they are willing to put up with a certain amount of it when necessary
 - products that push these limits will alienate some makers and not enjoy wide-spread acceptance
 
Given that manufacturers want to generate a continuous revenue stream from each product, what is the most acceptable method of extracting cash from makers?
- subscription (obvious continuous revenue)
 - pay-per-view (obvious continuous revenue)
 - advertising (Google & cloud model)
 - pay-per-product (not continuous, but users will by new product when new products provide better performance)
 - perpetual license with maintenance fees (normal CAD model)
 - other
 
If any of these is a low enough cost it will gain users, but assuming they are all the same cost, which is preferred?
			    
Top Comments
- 
	
	
					
				
			
			 
	
		
			
											
					brotherbob
				
					
		
			
		
			 
 
	
		- 
				Cancel
			
 
		
 
 
		 		 		
		- 
					
						
						
													Vote Up
						
						+2
													Vote Down
											
				
 
				- 
															
				
 
										- 
											Sign in to reply
									
 
																		- 
				More
			
 
			- 
				Cancel
			
 
		
 
  
 
	
Comment- 
	
	
					
				
			
			 
	
		
			
											
					brotherbob
				
					
		
			
		
			 
 
	
		- 
				Cancel
			
 
		
 
 
		 		 		
		- 
					
						
						
													Vote Up
						
						+2
													Vote Down
											
				
 
				- 
															
				
 
										- 
											Sign in to reply
									
 
																		- 
				More
			
 
			- 
				Cancel
			
 
		
 
  
 
Children