element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Avnet Boards Forums
  • Products
  • Dev Tools
  • Avnet Boards Community
  • Avnet Boards Forums
  • More
  • Cancel
Avnet Boards Forums
Ultra96 Hardware Design Ultra96-V2 low Wifi download speed
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Avnet Boards Forums to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Answers 4 answers
  • Subscribers 332 subscribers
  • Views 1284 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Ultra96-V2 low Wifi download speed

raider79
raider79 over 4 years ago

Using custom firmware or precompiled petalinux firmware of different versions, in all cases I got a low download speed (maximum 500 kb/s) with Ultra96-V2 access point mode (by default in precompiled firmware). Did anyone else have a problem with Wifi speed to atwillc3000 and is there any way to solve the problem?

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • bhfletcher
    bhfletcher over 4 years ago in reply to bobtek +1 suggested
    I may be using a later release with a newer driver, but I am seeing much higher performance than this using an iPerf example from narrucmot . Perhaps he can share more details as to what has recently changed…
Parents
  • bobtek
    0 bobtek over 4 years ago

    I am getting about the same throughput.  I connected via direct access (P2P) and tested by FTP'ing a large file.  Got the following:

    1) upload - 1.06 Mbytes/s

    2) download - 451 kbytes/s

     

    connecting via my local access point:

     

    1) upload - 1.42 Mbytes/sec

    2) download - 828 kbytes/sec

     

    The ATWILC3000 data sheet lists the max PHY rate of 72 Mbps.

    When my computer connected to the Ultra96-v2 board in direct mode, I noticed it was using the 802.11b/g PHY Mode (54Mbps).

    The SDIO interface is running at 4-bit mode, 50 MHz, so shouldn't be a limitation.  I would expect we should be getting ~3Mbytes/s throughput.

     

    Since I got better results when connecting via my local AP, it may be that the WiFi Direct P2P software is a bottleneck.  Also, I might be wrong, but I seem to remember seeing that WiFi direct mode could only connect to devices at 802.11b speeds (11Mbps).   It might be worth trying hostapd to see if we get better performance.

     

    Bob

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • raider79
    0 raider79 over 4 years ago in reply to bobtek

    Initially, I got this low performance when using hostapd.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • bobtek
    0 bobtek over 4 years ago in reply to raider79

    From the Microchip product page:

     

    The ATWILC3000 supports single stream 1x1 802.11n mode providing tested throughput of up to 46 Mbps UDP & 28 Mbps TCP/IP.

     

    I don't have an Ultra96-v1 board but it used the TI WL1831MOD WiFi module.  It would be interesting to see what the performance of that was.

     

    Bob

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
Reply
  • bobtek
    0 bobtek over 4 years ago in reply to raider79

    From the Microchip product page:

     

    The ATWILC3000 supports single stream 1x1 802.11n mode providing tested throughput of up to 46 Mbps UDP & 28 Mbps TCP/IP.

     

    I don't have an Ultra96-v1 board but it used the TI WL1831MOD WiFi module.  It would be interesting to see what the performance of that was.

     

    Bob

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
Children
  • bhfletcher
    0 bhfletcher over 4 years ago in reply to bobtek

    I may be using a later release with a newer driver, but I am seeing much higher performance than this using an iPerf example from narrucmot. Perhaps he can share more details as to what has recently changed.

    Bryan

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • bhfletcher
    0 bhfletcher over 4 years ago in reply to bhfletcher

    I followed instructions from narrucmot to run iperf3 tests in both Client and Server modes. These results are captured in the latest Getting Started Guide, which you can find here:

    Updated 2020.1 Out-of-Box image and Getting Started Guide

     

    Server Test (Figure 26 in the GSG)

    • 31.6 Mbits/sec as receiver

     

    Client Test (Figure 29 in the GSG)

    • 9.31 Mbits/sec as senderr
    • 9.11 Mbits/sec as receiver

     

    I think the biggest difference is that the latest builds have updated to a newer driver.

     

    Bryan

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • bobtek
    0 bobtek over 4 years ago in reply to bhfletcher

    Bryan,

    I ran the tests with the new driver and got almost the same results when connected to my local Access Point.  However, transfer rates are about 3x lower when connected using direct access to the Ultra96-v2. 

     

    The Microchip product page is explicit in saying that the tested throughput is with 802.11n mode.  I never see the WiFi link connecting with 802.11n mode just 802.11b/g.  Maybe we could get better performance if the link could use 802.11n mode.  Something in the driver or a config file?

     

    My results:

     

    Connecting direct to Ultra96-v2:

     

    Server Test

       • 8.38 Mbits/sec as receiver

     

    Client Test

       • 3.29 Mbits/sec as sender

       • 3.08 Mbits/sec as receiver

     

     

    Connecting via local access point:

     

    Server Test

       • 22.6 Mbits/sec as receiver

     

    Client Test

       • 8.82 Mbits/sec as sender

       • 8.69 Mbits/sec as receiver

     

     

    Bob

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube