element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
STM32F4DISCOVERY Expansion Boards
  • Products
  • Dev Tools
  • STM32F4DISCOVERY Expansion Boards
  • More
  • Cancel
STM32F4DISCOVERY Expansion Boards
Forum Discover Wi-Fi Module SPI Communication
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join STM32F4DISCOVERY Expansion Boards to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • State Not Answered
  • Replies 58 replies
  • Subscribers 7 subscribers
  • Views 7011 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • wifi
  • stm32f4
  • discovery
  • spi
  • discover
Related

Discover Wi-Fi Module SPI Communication

Former Member
Former Member over 10 years ago

I've been messing around for days and have been unable to get the SPI communication with the Wi-Fi module to work, it would never respond at all. I couldn't get the demo UART code to respond either, but I need SPI for the increased bandwidth anyways. Am I doing something wrong, like missing a setup step or something? I'm not even sure if I connected the correct pins on the board, as there are 2 sets of SPI pins (SPI and SPI3), and I'm not 100% sure of which pin is the "ALRT" pin. I couldn't even get that interrupt to fire, despite numerous attempts to send data to the module. Does anyone have some working SPI code and wiring? I'm kind of at a loss here. I've put the code is this gist and this gist (too many lines to paste here), it looks rather shoddy as I was trying various things to get the module to do anything at all. I tried both DMAs and straight up interrupts, though I'd prefer to use DMAs to save CPU cycles.

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • michaelkellett
    michaelkellett over 10 years ago in reply to Former Member +1
    Before you spend your money why not at least try to code it so that your waveforms look exactly like those on the data sheet ? And try clocking data out only when it's ready. These things might not make…
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 10 years ago in reply to michaelkellett +1
    Hi Michael, Thank you for your insight into SPI communication. I implemented that, driving a GPIO but with S/W and asserting prior to read/write and de-asserting when complete and it has improved communication…
  • michaelkellett
    0 michaelkellett over 10 years ago in reply to Former Member

    Nothing nice,

     

    The software only SPI is debuggable but takes a lot of effort and without test gear it's difficult to be sure that it's all working the way it should.

     

    You can buy a  logic analyser for as little as £7.99 from Ebay (these look like Salea knock offs - so you have to consider the ethics and risks).

     

    You can buy a real Salea for $109,

     

    Or you can look for a Hackerpsace

     

    Florida - HackerspaceWiki

     

    MK

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 10 years ago in reply to michaelkellett

    What about this logic analyzer? It looks pretty decent and is reasonably priced. I wasn't planning on buying a logic analyzer but I guess I don't have much of a choice. Going to a hackerspace is difficult in this case, since I won't have everything I need to work with the microcontroller.

     

    Prototype: Openbench Logic Sniffer logic analyzer | Dangerous Prototypes

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • michaelkellett
    0 michaelkellett over 10 years ago in reply to Former Member

    It looks OK and about as cheap as you can get legally.

     

    I've no experience of SUMP but it seems to supported by at least a few active people.

     

    I probably have  a different outlook on these things from you since I do this stuff for a living but I would worry that I might waste more time with the slightly DIY Logic Sniffer than I would doing in software.

    It shouldn't take more than a few hours to write  an instrumented bit banging SPI and then you can save your $50 for later.

    Another cheap approach would be to make a simple SPI debugger based on an ST nucleo board  (they are pretty cheap).

     

    MK

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 10 years ago in reply to michaelkellett

    Ok, I'll try the bit banging. What would I do next after trying that? As I said I'm rather clueless here, I haven't messed with hardware much before as I primarily do software programming, so I'm still kind of learning about this stuff. Plus this is a really strange issue.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • michaelkellett
    0 michaelkellett over 10 years ago in reply to Former Member

    You won't need to do anything else because it's bound to work image

     

    Actually you need write the bit banging interface so you can use it like a logic analyser. So for each clock edge you need to capture the bus state before and after. You'll need to reserve as big  a memory buffer as you can and stick the samples into that. Then you can read them out via a UART into a PC and process them using in your favorite a language.

     

    The last time I did this in a serious way I used an FPGA to snoop on the SPI bus and wrote software to decode and display it nicely. I was more interested in the traffic at a higher level and in understanding the protocol being used. I had to use the FPGA because I didn't control master or slave. If I had to do the same thing today I could use the logic analyser attache to my scope to capture the basic SPI traffic.

     

     

    MK

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 10 years ago in reply to michaelkellett

    I'm starting to wonder if there's a much bigger issue here. I can't get my USB-to-UART to communicate with the STM32F4, it's only receiving garbage. I made sure the baud rates are matched, and even tried 9600 baud. I'm just receiving 0xFC and 0x4, which is not what I transmitted.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • michaelkellett
    0 michaelkellett over 10 years ago in reply to Former Member

    First step is to check that the uP clock is running at the frequency you think.

     

    It's quite easy to get it wrong on the STM32Fxxx range.

     

    Set up a timer to blink an LED - and count the blinks with a watch if you don't have anything that'll measure fast pulses.

     

    In the ST library there is a function called:

    RCC_GetClocksFreq();

     

    Which will try and tell you how all the clocks are set - it makes soem assumptions (like about the speed of the HSE clock) so you need to check these are set correctly.

     

    MK

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 10 years ago in reply to michaelkellett

    I already had an issue with the clocks when messing with the external DAC, and I solved that and got it working, so it's definitely not that. Any other ideas?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 10 years ago in reply to Former Member

    I was able to get SPI communication working by starting with one of the SPI/DMA examples in the STMCube32 library package and modifying it to send canned messages. There's one in the manual and you should be able to construct others. You will have to vary the sequence number otherwise the module won't reply to subsequent messages. That's easy since the sequence number is not included in the checksum. Also be aware that the protocol is not the same as the UART protocol WRT checksum and escaping so you will not be able to just plug in SPI where UART is used in the example. (And that's aside from the situation that SPI reads complete whether the slave is sending anything or not.)

     

    Not clearly specified above is that you definitely need different firmware to use SPI. You will need to get that from Murata.

     

    I found this thread looking for info on the /ALRT signal described in the Murata manual (SNIC Serial Interface Specification, v2.6, SPI variant.) Is it on one of the Discovery-WiFi pins? Can it be put there using the SyChip SNIC Monitor? (Modify the firmware?)

     

    Thanks!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 10 years ago in reply to Former Member

    Hmm, wasn't aware the sequence number actually mattered, it's not very well documented. Should I be including the "| 0x80" in the checksum as with the UART or not? And as for the ALRT pin, that is pin 17 on J6 by default.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
<>
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube