element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
RoadTests & Reviews
  • Products
  • More
RoadTests & Reviews
RoadTest Forum What Are Your Most Popular Dev Kits or Reference Design Kits?
  • Blogs
  • RoadTest Forum
  • Documents
  • RoadTests
  • Reviews
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join RoadTests & Reviews to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 66 replies
  • Subscribers 2556 subscribers
  • Views 6057 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • What Are Your Most Popular Dev Kits or Reference Design Kits?
Related

What Are Your Most Popular Dev Kits or Reference Design Kits?

rscasny
rscasny over 2 years ago

I was asked this question the other day. What Are Your Most Popular Dev Kits or Reference Design Kits? On impulse, I would venture to say the Raspberry Pi, Beaglebone. I'm sure there are others. Sensor kits, FPGA kits, Motor Contr0ol kits, Power kits, come to mind, but I'm not sure which ones element14 would consider "popular."

So, I figured I would ask you.  What are your most popular kits?  If you have the time, please leave a comment below. 

Thanks

Randall Scasny

-element14 Community

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • taifur
    taifur over 2 years ago +4
    Arduino Uno and Raspberry Pi is my favorite.
  • ZGoode
    ZGoode over 2 years ago +3
    Personally, I'm a big fan of any boards that use the standard layouts such as Arduino Uno or Adafruit Feather. As such, the Nucleo boards from STMicro are always great to work with since they are Arduino…
  • misaz
    misaz over 2 years ago +3
    STM32 Nucleos are very popular. I have seen them everywhere where the serious MCUs designs are made. I think that there are two key things for making board popular: Price to performance ratio …
Parents
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 2 years ago

    For me the current most popular happen to be processing boards, these ones in particular: (1) Pi Pico, followed by (2) Raspberry Pi. I don't use Arduino boards all too often, although I like the new Arduino Rev 4.

    Pre-Pico, I used Mbed-enabled boards a lot! They are awesome.

    (1) Pi Pico: Ultra versatile. Both C/C++ SDK and MicroPython are excellent. Plus a second Pico can be used as a debugger for C/C++. Custom carrier board (Pico-Euro). Dev environment of choice: CLion

    (2) Raspberry Pi: Regularly used as a test/learning box for Linux, and for developing with GNU tools (usually C/C++), plus sometimes Python. Network-only, with no keyboard or monitor attached. (Therefore, for troubleshooting, I'm glad the Rev 5 Pi finally has a separate UART/console port! Took them long enough though..).

    (3) Arduino Rev 4: Low-cost development board for the Renesas RA4M1 microcontroller. Currently more likely to use the Renesas SDK+dev environment with it.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 2 years ago

    For me the current most popular happen to be processing boards, these ones in particular: (1) Pi Pico, followed by (2) Raspberry Pi. I don't use Arduino boards all too often, although I like the new Arduino Rev 4.

    Pre-Pico, I used Mbed-enabled boards a lot! They are awesome.

    (1) Pi Pico: Ultra versatile. Both C/C++ SDK and MicroPython are excellent. Plus a second Pico can be used as a debugger for C/C++. Custom carrier board (Pico-Euro). Dev environment of choice: CLion

    (2) Raspberry Pi: Regularly used as a test/learning box for Linux, and for developing with GNU tools (usually C/C++), plus sometimes Python. Network-only, with no keyboard or monitor attached. (Therefore, for troubleshooting, I'm glad the Rev 5 Pi finally has a separate UART/console port! Took them long enough though..).

    (3) Arduino Rev 4: Low-cost development board for the Renesas RA4M1 microcontroller. Currently more likely to use the Renesas SDK+dev environment with it.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
  • dougw
    dougw over 2 years ago in reply to shabaz

    It is great to see Arduino using a Renesas. Their MCUs have been suffering a bit from lack of exposure in the Arduino world.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • baldengineer
    baldengineer over 2 years ago in reply to dougw

    Agree. I think Renesas is well-known within the Automotive market. So, it is nice to see their microcontrollers get wider attention.

    However, it is strange to me that the Uno R4 was released before having mbed_os support.

    (But maybe I misunderstood a previous Arduino statement about fully supporting mbed_os on Arm-based Arduino cores moving forward.)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • BigG
    BigG over 2 years ago in reply to shabaz
    shabaz said:
    Pre-Pico, I used Mbed-enabled boards a lot! They are awesome.

    And, you still can or maybe you still do :-)

    When using Pi Pico, I tend to always go with the Arduino MbedOS option.

    Other favourite Arduino/MbedOS dev boards include Arduino Nano 33 BLE and the Arduino Giga R1 WiFi board.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 2 years ago in reply to BigG

    I've got a ton of Mbed code written over the years, just sitting idle on the cloud hehe. I'll have to make use of that sometime. 

    I'd forgotten about Arduino with Mbed support. I like the normal Pi Pico C/C++ SDK a lot though, so tend to use that. Although excellent, it did catch me out recently, when a sleep_us operation didn't work within a timer interrupt and just hangs there! Kind of obvious there was a risk of that (I had mistakenly assumed it would implement it as a no-op loop for small values) and I should have checked the documentation! Anyway, the solution (in case anyone else hit this) is to replace with busy_wait_us(). Aside from that hiccup, which was more my fault than anything else, the SDK has great.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube