element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
RoadTests & Reviews
  • Products
  • More
RoadTests & Reviews
RoadTest Forum What's Stopping You Building Your Next Project with an FPGA? (Please, Don't Blame the Cost!)
  • Blog
  • RoadTest Forum
  • Documents
  • RoadTests
  • Reviews
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join RoadTests & Reviews to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 100 replies
  • Subscribers 2564 subscribers
  • Views 8284 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • scasny
  • xilinx
  • fpgafeatured
Related

What's Stopping You Building Your Next Project with an FPGA? (Please, Don't Blame the Cost!)

rscasny
rscasny over 7 years ago

The community does a ton of projects with MCUs. If they do the job for you, that's great. But the element14 community is about learning, experimenting and roadtesting. In this spirit, I am proposing that you should try building your next project with an FPGA (SoC), if it suits the application, of course. What's stopping you? Oh, some members have voiced the cost issue. Granted, some FPGAs do cost a lot. But chip manufacturers are rolling out economical chipsets that most makers, pro-makers or experienced hobbyists can afford. (If you can't, then apply to a RoadTest and if you win you can get a dev board for FREE.) I think FPGA / SoCs will move into a more important place for electronic designers, especially for IoT applications. Perhaps it's time to experiement with one. What's stopping you?

 

Here's a link to a current roadtest:Digilent ARTY S7 Dev Board (Xilinx Spartan 7)   Apply today!

 

Randall Scasny

RoadTest Program Manager

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • Workshopshed
    Workshopshed over 7 years ago +16
    Hi Randall, I have been thinking about getting started with FPGAs this year. I've got myself a "TinyFPGA". I've gone for the $12 A version which is based on the Lattice Mach XO2-256. That's it's about…
  • ipv1
    ipv1 over 7 years ago +8
    rscasny I just posted a comment for this in the vivado discussion. To answer this question in short, I find very few projects worthy of an FPGA. An IoT application with FPGAs sounds fascinating though…
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 7 years ago +8
    There's a simple CPLD project here that I had a lot of fun working on, in case it helps provide ideas: Programmable Logic Project: Pseudo-Random Noise Generator CPLDs and FPGAs are great for signal generation…
  • COMPACT
    COMPACT over 7 years ago

    Ooh! Very ARTY indeed.

    It's a great opportunity for someone to show all to put VHDL, Verilog, C and schematic capture to the test.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • COMPACT
    COMPACT over 7 years ago in reply to COMPACT

    Why not someone attempt something strange?  Make a Floppy Disk Controller with it.

    It'd be a great demonstration of how to make a reliable Data Separator from a serial bitstream.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • rachaelp
    rachaelp over 7 years ago in reply to mcb1

    mcb1  wrote:

     

    While I can see they have great potential and are much more suited for some things, IMO they are one piece of hardware for a purpose ...like a regulator is to power.

    Whilst I agree FPGA's aren't for every project, they are certainly a lot more general purpose than a power regulator as you are free to configure them to do whatever you choose. They come in many different variants with low or high gate count, low power consumption or high performance, or anywhere in between, varying embedded peripheral cores, even analog cores. If you look at the Microsemi range, they have the Fusion devices which are mixed signal FPGA's which include ADC's with wide input range analog inputs, gate driver outputs, etc., and the SmartFusion devices which have embedded ARM cores, PCIe lanes, DDR controllers. The range of capabilities in the FPGA offerings across the various manufacturers is quite amazing.

     

    So with all the options available you CAN use FPGA's in almost any design, but whether you should is another matter. They will add some complexity to the design process and powering and clocking them add's additional regulators and clocking/reset requirements to your board. They do offer a lot of flexibility though, and if you have areas of a design which you are unsure of until you get something on a bench and are able to test in in a real working scenario, then they also offer a get out of jail free card as you can reconfigure them to cater for things you discover during testing which might otherwise have required a board re-spin. You could also simplify some parts of a board if you bring lots into an FPGA rather than having discrete components and it might mean you can get you board design done quicker and be getting on with your FPGA design while your PCB is out being built.

     

    Best Regards,

     

    Rachael

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +7 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Robert Peter Oakes
    Robert Peter Oakes over 7 years ago

    Thats Simple

     

    I have no idea where to start lol. And I have never used one before so a very steep learning curve.

     

    I know, if i carved out a few days I would be able to figure it out

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • johnbeetem
    johnbeetem over 7 years ago

    Greetings!

     

    Normally I'd be quicker to chime in on a question like this, but very busy yesterday working on FPGA tools image

     

    I've written lots on this topic, so I'll link to earlier discussions.

     

    Barriers to designing with FPGAs?

    Some FPGA Beginner Questions

    Not-as-expensive FPGA Boards

     

    You will find that the barriers to designing FPGAs are still pretty much the same:

     

    1. Very steep learning curve for new users.  You have to commit to a lot of work to get that first LED blinking.

     

    2. "Logic!  Why don't they teach Logic in these schools?" is as true today as in 1950 when C.S. Lewis published these words.  Schools teach "coding" (and sometimes "programming"), but not logic.  The serial thinking needed for most programming languages and the parallel thinking for digital design are different animals IMO.

     

    3. My personal soapbox: Microcomputers have open instruction sets, so anyone can develop languages and compilers for them.  This has made them ubiquitous and cheap.  Except for a few recent exceptions, FPGAs have closed bitstreams which means you are stuck with the tools and languages provided by vendors, which IMO has severely limited the use of FPGAs.  If Intel had insisted that everyone program in PL/M using an Intel-provided compiler, microprocessors would be in the same boat.  JMO/YMMV

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +8 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • johnbeetem
    johnbeetem over 7 years ago in reply to hlipka

    hlipka  wrote:

     

    The Xilinx XC9572XL is the go-to device for the hobbyist. Powerful enough to solve real problems (for which conventional logic gets too large) and fast enough at the same time (faster than most MCUs). It can handle 5V on its inputs, so its compatible to many peripherals. Its quite cheap and there are many breakout boards available. Xilinx ISE is free, and programmers are cheap.

    I used lots of XC9572XL CPLDs and the smaller XC9536XL in designs around the turn of the century.  It was a great part, and one of the last still available in a hobbyist-friendly 44-pin PLCC.  I even used wire-wrap sockets for one project image

     

    Nowadays I'd go with Lattice iCE40.  They're small, cheap FPGAs with open-source design tools available.  Not instant-on like the XC9572XL, but pretty fast load time since they're so small.  Small parts program in less than 15 msec according my quick scan of the data sheet.  You can load then from an external serial flash or use the one-time-programmable internal memory for production.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +5 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • genebren
    genebren over 7 years ago in reply to johnbeetem

    John,

     

    I tried the Lattice tools for ICE40 devices. but I just could not get the tools to work as well as the Xilinx tools.  I liked the parts but hated the tools.  Have you had any success with them?

     

    Gene

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • johnbeetem
    johnbeetem over 7 years ago in reply to genebren

    genebren  wrote:

     

    I tried the Lattice tools for ICE40 devices. but I just could not get the tools to work as well as the Xilinx tools.  I liked the parts but hated the tools.  Have you had any success with them?

    I've never used the Lattice tools for iCE40.  I've only used the open-source IceStorm tools on Ubuntu or Lubuntu GNU/Linux.

     

    Project IceStorm: fully open-source FPGA tools for Lattice iCE40

    John Beetem's IceStorm Notes

    John Beetem's Arachne-pnr Notes

     

    I haven't used IceStorm's Verilog synthesizer Yosys much.  I mostly use my XXICC (21st Century Co-design) release 0.0r , which generates iCE40 BLIF files for arachne-pnr, IceStorm's place-and-route tool.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • COMPACT
    COMPACT over 7 years ago in reply to johnbeetem

    This 21st century yabber about teaching coding at schools thinking that it's new stuff.....

    I learned set theory as a 6 year old at primary school in the 1970's and later about DeMorgan's theorem and Karnaugh maps.

    We didn't have computers so we used simple items such as cane hoops, wooden blocks and punch cards.

    Then I started building stuff with 4000 series logic.

     

    Those were the days.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • hlipka
    hlipka over 7 years ago in reply to johnbeetem

    OpenTechLabs has a nive two-part intro video, also showing installation of the open-source toolchain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bIeiMmqaZE

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
<>
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube