element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
RoadTests & Reviews
  • Products
  • More
RoadTests & Reviews
RoadTest Forum 2 Roadtests, 4 Reviewers, 0 Reviews: When A RoadTester Does Not Complete a Review
  • Blogs
  • RoadTest Forum
  • Documents
  • RoadTests
  • Reviews
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join RoadTests & Reviews to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 54 replies
  • Subscribers 2569 subscribers
  • Views 5665 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • scasny
Related

2 Roadtests, 4 Reviewers, 0 Reviews: When A RoadTester Does Not Complete a Review

rscasny
rscasny over 6 years ago

Recently, I selected roadtest applicants who were both new roadtesters  and have not participated much on the community, primarily because I have had some other members tell me that I am using experienced roadtesters too much. (This is never my intent; I select the best applicants. When I roadtest writes only a 1-sentence application, I don't have much to go on and these folks usually don't get selected.)

 

I had to report roadtest results to 2 sponsors. Well, the results for these 2 roadtests were not great: 4 roadtesters haven't done their reviews, they haven't logged in for 3 to 4 months, and they have not responded to all our follow ups that we do for every roadtest. Before I selected these 4, I contacted them and they agreed to commit to delivering the review in 60 days.

 

Now, 2 roadtests is a fraction of all roadtests. For many roadtests we get 100% compliance. I'd say overall we are getting a compliance rate in the upper80s/lower90s, which is good and a far cry from where we were 2 years ago when we were at the sub-20% level.

 

Speaking for the sponsor and myself, we understand that in some situations people will be unable to complete the review. After all, people do get ill and emergencies do arise in everyone's lives, so I never expect to have 100% compliance for every roadtest. I recall someone who had a tree fall on his house in an ice storm. That's a major tragedy in my book. Of course I would not expect a review. But these instances are atypical and very few compared to all roadtests and roadtesters I deal with.

 

While we give the official roadtesters the kits and the shipping for free, someone does pay for these things. Typically, the sponsor pays for the kits and element14 pays for the shipping costs to the roadtesters. But we are more than happy to do this because we value our roadtesters' opinions and we are happy to absorb the costs when the reviews are published.

 

But the question comes to mind: what happens when a roadtester doesn't complete the review:

 

1. The sponsor does not receive all the feedback he is seeking when he enrolled in the roadtest program as a sponsor.

2. Someone who does not complete the review prevents someone who could have done the review from doing it.

3. It prevents our members from learning about the product.

4. It damages the credibility of the program.

5. The delinquent roadtesters prevent themselves for being considered for a high-priced product. If I can't reliably use someone for a $35 US roadtest, how can I expect them to do the review for a $3500 US roadtest!

6. I am placed in the embarrassing situation to explain why 4 people I selected did not do their reviews.

 

There are other reasons but 6 reasons is enough to make my point.

 

It is my responsibility to get the required results for both our sponsors. My bosses also have expectations and expect that I will solve problems. I want people to use the RoadTest program to have fun with technology,  and get some products or equipment that they may not have the budget to get on their own. But I also need mature, responsible members who are engaged in our community, demonstrate an appropriate level of professionalism, and are responsive to our follow up requests. I like to think most roadtesters are professional. I surely do not think these 4 delinquent roadtesters represent the RoadTest group.

 

But going forward, I will have to modify my approach in selection somewhat. And I probably will not hand out all the kits if I don't feel I have enough roadtesters who are knowledgeable about the product, and are mature, professional and reliable. If you were in doubt that I am very serious about people completing their reviews, I hope this discussion makes my position very clear. I apologize to all my loyal and responsbile roadtesters who do complete their reviews. But this is a community and I have to communicate my concerns as well as be open to new ideas and feedback: it's a two-way street.

 

If you can't finish the review, contact me and tell me or my colleague danzima why. If you need a bit more time, that's fine if you need to do more testing. (Needing more time to finish your Differential Equations homework or finishing your digital electronics lab is not a reason for needing more time.) Communicate and keep us in the loop; you will find in your career that developing communication skills is as important as honing those engineering skills. Even if you received a non-working product, you are still required to post a review. Put it out to the members: "I took these readings and I believe it's faulty. Help me troubleshoot it." There are plenty of eager members who are more than happy to help.

 

I want everyone to benefit from a Roadtest. I think completed roadtests are a great place to learn. I think they are a fantastic vehicle for the new engineer who is trying to shine in their first job interview. Read our e-book on IoT careers to learn more shining in a job interview: https://www.element14.com/community/community/publications/ebooks?ICID=hp-iotcareerebook-rotational#?ICID=ebooks-downloa…

 

But you can't reap the benefits of the roadtest program if you don't do your reviews.

 

Sincerely,

 

Randall Scasny

RoadTest Program Manager

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • rscasny
    rscasny over 6 years ago +12
    Hi All. I'd like to thank everyone who has participated in this discussion. It's help me clarify the problem and think about solutions. Change Idea #1: I used to send a standard availability email when…
  • Fred27
    Fred27 over 6 years ago +10
    Unfortunately you are going to get some people like that. I don't envy your job having to pick road testers. It must be tricky trying to balance the requirements of the suppliers (who are the ones that…
  • DAB
    DAB over 6 years ago +8
    Sadly, that is the outcome I predicted several years ago. If you want to satisfy the vendors, you have to use trusted road testers. You can always allocate a couple of inexpensive gear tests to newbies…
Parents
  • rscasny
    rscasny over 6 years ago

    Hi All.

     

    I'd like to thank everyone who has participated in this discussion. It's help me clarify the problem and think about solutions.

     

    Change Idea #1: I used to send a standard availability email when I notify the roadtest finalists wether they are new roadtesters or experience. I will start sending out a separate email for new roadtesters that spells out the responsibilities of a roadtester and the consequences of not doing a review.

     

    Change Idea #2-- I am thinking that I should have an onboarding webinar for new roadtesters. It may be a way to build relationships with new people and they can hear from me and what I expect.

     

    Change Idea #3--I have had some instances when a member was not available because he was doing another roadtest. I am considering setting up later due dates for these people instead of choosing someone else who wrote a below average application.

     

    Change Idea #4--If I got 5 kits to hand out and I honestly feel I don't have 5 reliable roadtesters, I may have to select less than 5 and reserve the other kits for a project.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +12 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • colporteur
    colporteur over 6 years ago in reply to rscasny

    CI#1: This has merit. The new parties know the rules going in. The more they know, the easier it is for you to take action. What consequences can you enforce?

     

    CI#2: This idea has some merit. I am assuming the completion of the webinar for new applicants can be tracked. I suggest once they are accepted, you require them to complete the process a week before shipping the goods. Failure to comply, you can withdraw their names.

     

    CI#3 is valid. It is not unreasonable if a person is committed to a RoadTest, the scheduling for another RoadTest can be delayed. You can make that decision depending on the commitment to your vendors.

     

    CI#4 I'm going to assume no RoadTest without product distribution is better than no RoadTest and product gone with no return. If you send kits to marginal participants, then you are putting yourself at risk. How you can use the product for a future test, is up to you. I rather liked the grab bag RoadTest, I got selected for.

     

    How long do you have to be a member to be eligible? I think a cooling down period may help screening, especially if advertisement outside this site is attracting undesirables. Active members for <30 Days need not apply.

     

    Is there someway to create a minor league, that players start out in and work their way to the big leagues. Or maybe a tiered RoadTest participation roster. The vendors can help select the tier they want their product tested at. Their is a junior, minors and professional levels. Maybe you have to work the AAA "triple A" club (i.e. webinar, why me plea and other obstacles) before getting to the juniors. From there you work you way up to the pro's.

     

    I'm thinking the mission badges must be able to help you there. You have people training in the minors for a shot.

     

    Just spit balling ideas while I am waiting for the Canadian world cup of soccer womans game to start. Go Canada!

     

    Sean

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • colporteur
    colporteur over 6 years ago in reply to rscasny

    CI#1: This has merit. The new parties know the rules going in. The more they know, the easier it is for you to take action. What consequences can you enforce?

     

    CI#2: This idea has some merit. I am assuming the completion of the webinar for new applicants can be tracked. I suggest once they are accepted, you require them to complete the process a week before shipping the goods. Failure to comply, you can withdraw their names.

     

    CI#3 is valid. It is not unreasonable if a person is committed to a RoadTest, the scheduling for another RoadTest can be delayed. You can make that decision depending on the commitment to your vendors.

     

    CI#4 I'm going to assume no RoadTest without product distribution is better than no RoadTest and product gone with no return. If you send kits to marginal participants, then you are putting yourself at risk. How you can use the product for a future test, is up to you. I rather liked the grab bag RoadTest, I got selected for.

     

    How long do you have to be a member to be eligible? I think a cooling down period may help screening, especially if advertisement outside this site is attracting undesirables. Active members for <30 Days need not apply.

     

    Is there someway to create a minor league, that players start out in and work their way to the big leagues. Or maybe a tiered RoadTest participation roster. The vendors can help select the tier they want their product tested at. Their is a junior, minors and professional levels. Maybe you have to work the AAA "triple A" club (i.e. webinar, why me plea and other obstacles) before getting to the juniors. From there you work you way up to the pro's.

     

    I'm thinking the mission badges must be able to help you there. You have people training in the minors for a shot.

     

    Just spit balling ideas while I am waiting for the Canadian world cup of soccer womans game to start. Go Canada!

     

    Sean

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
  • stevesmythe
    stevesmythe over 6 years ago in reply to colporteur

    colporteur  wrote:

     

    CI#4 I'm going to assume no RoadTest without product distribution is better than no RoadTest and product gone with no return. If you send kits to marginal participants, then you are putting yourself at risk. How you can use the product for a future test, is up to you. I rather liked the grab bag RoadTest, I got selected for.

     

    Although, as you pointed out yourself, the "grab bag" RoadTest had a very poor rate of completed reviews!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube