Microchip PoE to USB-C® Power and Data Adapter

Table of contents




{tabbedtable} Tab Label Tab Content

The Microchip PoE to USB-C® adapter connects IoT devices with a USB-C connector to Power over Ethernet (PoE) networks, enabling users to leverage the advantages of PoE and USB-C technologies. The PD-USB-DP60 is a PoE to USB-C adapter that provides both power and data to USB-C hosts and power to USB-C Powered Devices.


The PD-USB-DP60 adapter enables flexible installation of USB-C devices, removes the need for a close power outlet and resolves the issue of limited USB cable length. The PoE source can be up to 328 ft/100m from the location of the USB-C device. A single Ethernet cable is needed while delivering up to 60W of USB power at the output of the adapter.



The PD-USB-DP60 connects with small PCs/Next Unit of Computing (NUC), interactive information kiosks, smart monitors, tablets, laptops, cellphones, cameras and other USB-C powered devices consuming up to 60W. The adapter is compatible with USB2.0 and 3.1 and will automatically provide to the end device the exact amount of power it needs.



  • Up to 60W output power
  • Enables powering of small PCs/Next Unit of Computing (NUC), interactive information kiosks, smart monitors, tablets, laptops, cameras and other USB-C devices
  • Provides power and data to USB-C Hosts
  • Allows 328 ft/100m installation range
  • Supports PoE Switches and Injectors from 15.4W and up to 90W
  • Plug and play USB-C Power, no configuration is needed, simple to use


Additional Information

Important Dates

Enrollment Begin: Apr 12 2021

Enrollment Ends: May 21 2021

RoadTesters Selected:Jun 11 2021

Product Shipped: Jun 11 2021

RoadTesting Begins: Jun 17 2021

Reminder/Update Email: July 17 2021

Submit Reviews By: Aug 17 2021

*The element14 RoadTest Staff will send this reminder/update email.

**If a RoadTester is unable to meet the deadline, please notify the RoadTest Program Lead, , as soon as possible before the deadline.


How to locate the official RoadTest review form:  How To Locate the Official RoadTest Review Form (duplicate)


Terms and Conditions

Microchip PoE to USB-C® Power and Data Adapter– RoadTest

Terms and Conditions

These are the terms and conditions which govern the Microchip PoE to USB-C® Power and Data Adapter RoadTest contest. This Contest requires participants to submit an application indicating their previous experience with this type of equipment/component, information on what they would do to test the equipment/component, and the applicant’s desire to post a thorough review of their experience with images, photos, or other supplemental materials. Participants will be required to meet the Conditions for Participation.  The winners of this RoadTest will receive the item(s) listed below. RoadTest Reviews are due no later than 60 days after the receipt of the item(s). No other prizes are offered.

The Principal terms of the Competition:

The following words and phrases are used in these terms and conditions and have the meanings given to them below.


Key dates:

Applications Close: midnight (GMT) on May 21 2021

Announcement of Winner (estimated): May 24 2021

Prize:  Microchip PoE to USB-C® Power and Data Adapter

Additional Prizes: none

Competition Site: https://www.element14.com/community/groups/roadtest?ICID=menubar_resources_roadtest

Site or element14 Community: www.element14.com/community

Judges: members of the element14 community team chosen at the Organiser’s discretion.

Judging Criteria, All of the following which will have equal weighting:

· Demonstrated competence with the technologies including links or descriptions of past projects

· Qualifications as indicated by current job role and/or schooling/vocational training;

· A thorough description of how the prize would be tested;

· Likelihood that the Applicant will blog about the prize and provide a review on element14.com;

· Originality;

· Innovation.

Organiser: Premier Farnell plc (registered in England and Wales under company number 876412) whose registered office is at Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds, UK

Conditions for Qualification: in addition to meeting the requirements of these terms, all persons applying to take part in the Contest (each one an Applicant) must:

· Provide a RoadTest application describing what he/she would do if awarded the Prize including similar previous projects, product experience and qualifications

Terms: these terms and conditions which govern the Competition and to which the Organiser reserves the right to make changes from time to time and the latest version of these Terms from time to time will be posted to the Site.

  1. Eligibility
  2. Applications:
  3. Selecting Winners:
  4. Liability:
  5. General:

1.1 Save as set out in these Terms, the Contest is open to any natural or legal person, firm or company or group of natural persons or unincorporated body.

1.2 All Applicants must be aged at least 18 at the time of their application.

1.3 Applicants must not enter the RoadTest if doing so or taking part may:

1.3.1 cause the Organiser and/or themselves to be in breach of any agreement (including but not limited to any contract of employment) to which they are a party or in breach of any law, regulation or rule having the force of law to which the Organiser or the Applicant may be subject or any policy of the Organiser or the Sponsor;

1.3.2 Require the Organiser to obtain any licence, authorisation or permission to deal with the Applicant; or

1.3.3 Be in breach of any policy or practice of their employer. Some employers prohibit or restrict their employees from taking part in competitions such as these or receiving prizes under them and the Organiser respects those policies and practices.

The Organiser reserves the right to disqualify any Application made in breach of these Terms and to reject any Application which it reasonably believes may be or become in breach. The Organiser reserves the right to require evidence in such form as the Organiser may reasonably require of any Applicant’s compliance with any of these Terms and to disqualify any Applicant or Participant who cannot provide such evidence reasonably promptly.

1.4 Multiple applications are not permitted.

1.5 Applications may not be submitted by an agent whether acting on behalf of an undisclosed principal or otherwise.

1.6 The Contest is NOT open to:

1.6.1 Any person or entity who is a resident or national of any country which is subject to sanctions, embargoes or national trade restrictions of the United States of America, the European Union or the United Kingdom;

1.6.2 Any employee, director, member, shareholder (as appropriate) or any of their direct families (parents, siblings, spouse, partner, children) (“Direct Families”) of the Organiser and Sponsors; or

2.1 Each Applicant must fully complete and submit a RoadTest Application by the Application Close.

2.2 By submitting a Registration Form, each Applicant:

2.2.1 Authorises the Organiser to use his or her personal data (as defined in the Data Protection Act 1998) for the purposes of running and promoting the RoadTest;

2.2.2 Authorises the Organizer to copy, reproduce and publish their application should they be accepted as a Participant;

2.2.3 Will be deemed to have read, accepted and agree to be bound by these Terms. Applicants are advised to print and keep safe these Terms;

2.2.4 Authorises the Organiser to copy, reproduce and use the Application and/or Review for the purposes of the RoadTest and as otherwise contemplated by these Terms. The Organiser will not be responsible for any inaccuracy, error or omission contained in any reproduction or use of the Project Blogs.

2.2.5 Licenses the Organiser to use the intellectual property in the Project (IP) for the purposes of this Contest. As between the Applicant and the Organiser the IP remains owned by the Applicant.

2.2.6 Grants the Organiser the right to use his or her likeness, photographs, logos, trademarks, audio or video recordings without restriction for the purposes of Contest or the promotion of it or the Site;

2.2.7 Agrees to participate positively in all publicity surrounding the Contest;

2.2.8 Agrees to be responsible for all expenses and costs incurred by him or her in preparing for, entering and participating in the Contest (save for any expenses expressly agreed by the Organiser to be borne by it in these Terms);

2.2.9 Confirms that he or she owns all IP used in his or her application or Project or Blogs and indemnifies the Organiser from any claim by a third party that use of any material provided by an Applicant to the Organiser infringes the intellectual property rights of any third party;

2.2.10 Agrees not to act in any way or fail to act in any way or be associated with any cause or group which would have a negative impact on the reputation of the Organiser and/or the RoadTest.

2.3 All applications submitted to this RoadTest must meet the following criteria:

2.3.1 Applicants must be the author, creator and owner of the proposed review idea. Applicants must not submit someone else’s idea;

2.3.2 The proposed application must be reasonably achievable by the within the time constraints of the Contest;

2.3.3 Applications must not include or propose any of the following, the inclusion of which shall render any proposed application ineligible:

(a) Applications which relate to socially taboo topics, such as illicit drug use or sexual gratification;

(b) Applications that are or could reasonably be considered to be illegal, immoral, discriminatory or offensive as determined by the Organiser;

(c) Applications in relation to them which if accepted would infringe or breach any of the policies or terms of access or use of the Site.

2.4 No Application may contain any of the hazardous substances identified by Article 4 of Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament on the Restrictions on the Use of Substances in Electronic and Electrical Equipment ("the Directive") or the use of such hazardous substances in the in any such Project must not exceed the maximum concentration values set out in the Directive.

3.1 Winners will be selected by the Organiser on the basis of the quality of his or her application and its adherence to these Terms.

3.2 The total number of Winners selected will be at least the minimum number set out above but the actual number is at the sole discretion of the Organizer and/or the Sponsor, if applicable.

3.3 The Organiser will use all reasonable efforts to announce the Winners via an update to the RoadTest page by the date listed above.

3.4 Winners agree to take part in all publicity which the Organiser or the Sponsor wishes to use to promote the RoadTest, the Products featured or other Contests with which the Organiser may be connected from time to time.

3.5 Details of the Winners may also be published in the media.

3.6 Winners are responsible for all applicable taxes, duties or other charges payable in relation to any prize.


4.1 The Organiser hereby excludes all and any Liability arising out of the Contest or the acceptance, use, quality, condition, suitability or performance of any Prize, even where that Liability may arise from the Organiser’s negligence.

4.2 Nothing in these Terms will affect any Liability of the Organiser for death or personal injury arising from its negligence, for breach of Part II of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (in the event that any entrant is entitled to claim rights under the Consumer Protection Act 1987) or for any matter in relation to which it would be illegal for the Organiser to exclude or to attempt to exclude its Liability.

4.3 Subject to 4.2, neither the Organiser, any parent company nor any subsidiary of the Organiser or such parent company or any of their directors, officers and employees (together referred to in these terms and the ‘Associates’) makes any guarantee, warranty or representation of any kind, express or implied, with respect to this Competition or the Prizes potentially available under it. Neither the Organiser nor any of its Associates shall be responsible for any Liability that may arise out of or in connection with person’s participation in this Competition, the claiming, redemption or value of any prizes under it, the use or enjoyment of such prizes or any events or circumstances arising out of or in connection with any of them. Any implied warranties of condition, merchantability or suitability or fitness for purpose of any of them are hereby expressly excluded. Wherever used in these Terms, ‘Liability’ shall mean any and all costs, expenses, claims, damages, actions, proceedings, demands, losses and other liabilities (including legal fees and costs on a full indemnity basis) arising directly or indirectly out of or in connection with the matter concerned.

5.1 The RoadTest is organised and sponsored by the Organiser. The Organiser reserves the right to delegate all or any of its powers, rights and obligations arising in relation to the RoadTest to any Associate and certain such rights and powers are assumed by the Organiser on behalf of itself and each Associate. Reference to “Organiser” shall be deemed to include reference to each Associate.

5.2 The RoadTest may be terminated at any time if there are, in the sole opinion of the Organiser, an insufficient number of entries, or if the Applications are not of an appropriate standard for a competition of this nature. The Organiser has the right to cancel or suspend the RoadTest at any time due to circumstances outside its reasonable control.

5.3 The Organiser shall have the sole discretion to disqualify (without correspondence or right of appeal) any Applicant it considers to be adversely affecting the process or the operation of the RoadTest or to be in breach of these Terms or to be acting in a disruptive manner or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other Applicant or Participant.

5.4 The Organiser has the right to amend or add to these Terms from time to time. Revised Terms and Conditions will be posted on the Contest Site and it is a condition of entry to the RoadTest that Applicants agree to comply with these Terms and, if appropriate, such Terms as amended from time to time.

5.5 Headings are for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation or construction of these Terms and Conditions.

5.6 These Terms and the operation of the Contest shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English Law and any claim or matter arising under these Terms shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts.

Comment List
  • Greetings


    You are absolutely correct Sir. This community is a great place to be associated with. Members, have been very helpful and patient with me. Good luck with all your future Tinkering, and see you on the blogs soon.


    Steve K

  • One of the components, in this gathering of technology tinkers, that makes it a pleasure to participate, is the willingness of its members to provide assistance to help people succeed. Your success in completing the RoadTest is a success for all of us.

  • I now have POWER !!!

    The Injector I purchased, to be used to conduct test for my review, is now working! The PoE adapter is supplying power to all my IoT devices, NOW THAT I AM USING AN OTG ADAPTER!!


    Thanks to my fellow reviewers:

    For your information on a OTG cable to solve the problems  I was having with getting Power from the Microchip PoE Adapter to my IoT devices.



    The OTG cable that I found in the airport one day fixed everything.

    It is an APPLE product Model A1632.


    Thanks Again

    Steve K

  • AWE CRAP! Yet again when you learn what you don't know. I've made assumption about Pi OTG that are way off the mark. Man did I get it wrong.


    USB On-The-Go  is a specification that enables USB devices, to act as a host, allowing other USB devices, such as USB flash drives, digital cameras, mouse or keyboards, to be attached to them.


    My misstep was thinking that the one USB connector on the device is power, OTG gives you expanded capabilities on that connector. If a device was OTG capabilites then the power connector included data. No, No, No. My bad.


    Not only is the PiZeroW without data on the power connection, the other Pi models are the same, with the exception of the Pi4B. That explains my errors in the posts USB Conundrum  & Microchip PoE to USB-CRegistered Power and Data Adapter RoadTest Review Data Success.  The test was data on the power connector. If the connector doesn't support data ( as has pointed out), then of course the device would fail.


    I need to go back to the bench and try data tests on the USB connections on the Pi's. I feel rode hard and put away wet on the Microchip PoE to USB-CRegistered Power and Data Adapter RoadTest

  •   wrote:


    What specification do you recommend when ordering a adapter online to get one that supports the functions of USB-C?


    My requirement is to go from the USB-C female (output of the Microchip PoE cable) to a USB micro micro (i.e connector on PiZeroW & Pi3B+).


    If you have a recommendation that would be great!

    Another wrinkle with the Pi Zero / W boards is the fact the port normally used for power has no D+/D- data pins connected:



    It seems only the port used for USB-OTG has data pins connected, but the power is connected to Vbus rather than 5V. Whether the port allows for reverse-powering is not something I can be sure of.


    So if you want to get power and data working, your best bet is to connect the cable to the USB_OTG port, not the Power port - but noting that it would "reverse-power" the board through a pin that's normally supposed to power a downstream load. I suspect it will probably work but may not be the intended way of operation. I can't rule out the potential for damage either - as I don't have the hardware, I can't try that out.


    - Gough

  •   wrote:


    What specification do you recommend when ordering a adapter online to get one that supports the functions of USB-C?


    My requirement is to go from the USB-C female (output of the Microchip PoE cable) to a USB micro micro (i.e connector on PiZeroW & Pi3B+).


    If you have a recommendation that would be great!

    That's a tough question to answer as the "functions of USB-C" don't all translate to the legacy connections - things like CC pins aren't passed through as they're internally terminated in the adapters, likewise side-band channels are usually left open.


    As mentioned before - a USB-C to USB-A OTG adapter should be used as the first step. Whether you get a USB 3.0 capable one or a USB 2.0 one doesn't matter so much for the Raspberry Pi as their OTG ports are USB 2.0 only, but getting a USB 3.0 one may allow for more possibilities if you use it with other equipment. Plugging this into the PoE-USB-C adapter will tell it that it's connected as OTG so it can start sourcing power. Then a regular USB-A to USB-microB cable can be used from that adapter through to the Pi's microUSB-B connector. This regular cable will tell the Pi-end that it's connected as a device and can accept power (not that this matters as the Pi doesn't have an internal battery).


    In the case of the Pi 3B+, there's no point in having data - the OTG pins on the USB plug are just open circuit as the hardware design uses the OTG controller to serve the hub/Ethernet chip that runs the four USB-A ports on that board. For the Pi Zero W, there should be some USB-OTG capability so it may be able to get the data link going as well under the above recommendation.


    For reference, my USB-C to USB-A OTG adapter came from Daiso for AU$2.80. It's not a particularly high-quality USB 3.0 type adapter, but it does the job and is locally available in Australia. I'm not sure of a "single-cable" solution, as vendors aren't always clear as to what their adapters are configured for or their cables. If the end plugging into the PoE-USB-C adapter is configured not as OTG but as device, the adapter will not source power at all.


    That being said - this cable is labelled as if it should do the trick - https://www.amazon.com.au/CableCreation-Braided-480Mbps-Android-Devices/dp/B0744BKDRD  but as I've not got one of them myself, I can't guarantee compatibility.

    Similarly, the description on this one also seems to be just fine - https://www.amazon.com.au/AmazonBasics-USB-Type-Micro-Cable/dp/B01LONQ7R6

    An adapter like this one should theoretically work too - noting it clearly says micro-USB B device - https://www.amazon.com.au/Female-Adapter-ARKTEK-Samsung-Galaxy/dp/B072J5B3BR/


    That being said, if you have something that works already, I probably wouldn't be inclined to splurge on more random cables and adapters.


    - Gough

  • What specification do you recommend when ordering a adapter online to get one that supports the functions of USB-C?


    My requirement is to go from the USB-C female (output of the Microchip PoE cable) to a USB micro micro (i.e connector on PiZeroW & Pi3B+).


    If you have a recommendation that would be great!

  • Yep - 802.3bt is niche at the moment and there really isn't all that much that uses it for now. Agreed that 802.3af/at are both more common and meet the majority of ordinary PoE loads today.


    Unfortunately the recommended Microchip PD-9601GC is not available in Australia (probably a lack of demand) and 802.3bt gear available via local resellers are all Type 3 (60W) which wouldn't have been enough, so I ordered a Type 4 injector from overseas. The outlay wasn't too bad, but when one considers that is just for a single port, adding up the price of the adapter and the injector makes it a bit less appealing. It arrived a few days ago and it seems to be working well - but I'm still waiting on some USB-C PD decoy boards also ordered at the same time so I can hook the output into a load for some proper load and end-to-end efficiency tests.


    - Gough

  • Ha, ha! It appears you did beat me to it, although the thread title had nothing to do with the actual issue (or the RoadTest) and I didn't see it. Good on you for ordering an 802.3bt injector. I thought about ordering an 802.3bt PoE switch until I saw the prices! I expect the prices will come down in the next year or two but they're still fairly new at the moment. I can only test up to 30W on my existing 802.3at switches so it would be great if you could fill the gap.

  • Yes, indeed, there are many non-compliant accessories and unexpected CC-line resistor configurations that won't necessarily work. If the USB-C end is configured to look like it's being connected from a power source to a device, the PoE-USB-C adapter will not source any power and will instead expect to be used like a USB-Ethernet adapter only.


    However, if you use a USB-C OTG adapter which adapts to USB-A - usually these are configured such that the USB-C end is set to OTG (or host) which will cause the PoE-USB-C adapter to start sourcing power in addition to working as a USB-Ethernet adapter.


    I suspect your USB-C to USB-mini-B may be intended for use with a USB-mini-B cable to connect to a USB-C device for charging purposes. That would usually have the USB-C side configured to look like it is connected from a power source to a device so the device can go and charge from it.


    USB micro-B connections can support USB-OTG as well, although whether they source power or sink power may depend on how the ID-pin is configured on the cable plug itself. This is rarely ever properly configured - but I found using a standard USB-A to micro-B device cable has the ID pin configured such that the end device decides to sink as a device ... while negotiating the USB roles in the reverse with the sink as the host so the LAN7800 chip can connect.


    The proof? Here's my Lenovo Miix 2 tablet both connected via the LAN7800 and charging from the adapter at the same time - note the tablet only has ONE power/data port so there's absolutely no other way I can do it:


    So sometimes, a bit of playing about with several adapters may be necessary. There are some testers which will diagnose what the CC pins are doing, but sadly, I don't have any of those on hand.


    My RoadTest review is currently stalled despite fulfilling all my initial proposal, pending the arrival of some ordered components since I decided to deviate from my original RoadTest plan and add a whole extra two sections which need an 802.3bt injector and some USB-C PD goodies to complete. I figured it would be unfair to Microchip to focus on 802.3at/af (even though that is most popular and economical at this time) and USB non-PD given that this is the first product to be both 802.3bt and USB-C PD capable ... so I've splurged. But the current COVID-19 lock-down in Sydney and slow international shipping ... we'll see if it arrives in time.


    - Gough