element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Embedded and Microcontrollers
  • Technologies
  • More
Embedded and Microcontrollers
Blog Are newly implemented tech schools and programs for students headed towards extinction?
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Embedded and Microcontrollers to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: Catwell
  • Date Created: 11 Mar 2014 3:25 AM Date Created
  • Views 540 views
  • Likes 0 likes
  • Comments 4 comments
  • clubs
  • computer_clubs
  • on_campus
  • diy
  • schools
  • Design
  • cabeatwell
  • learning
Related
Recommended

Are newly implemented tech schools and programs for students headed towards extinction?

Catwell
Catwell
11 Mar 2014

image

California’s BPPE sets its sights on coding bootcamps (via stock)


Education is one of the biggest issues the younger generations are facing today. According to the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), the US is lagging far behind other countries when it comes to the sciences, math and even reading (based on the 2012 PISA exam). These statistics will undoubtedly limit what jobs will be available to the students of today, a good portion of which will be in the technology sector with a focus on coding and programming. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the demand for healthcare IT and mobile networks professionals will, in turn, promote an increased demand for programmers, systems analysts and support technicians to the tune of 22% of those currently employed by the year 2020. In an effort to keep those potential jobs from going offshore, the US government, tech companies and academic institutions have initiated several programs that bring the computer sciences to classrooms and other learning centers. Several nonprofits, including Code.org, Khan Academy and MIT’s Scratch have sprung into existence since 2012 to give kids a leg-up on the skills needed to land one of those tech jobs by providing the necessary tools online. The popularity of those programs has invaded classrooms all over the globe (programming has become part of the sciences in some schools) and as a result, has spawned a slew of independent programming and coding schools in the US. This also brought on the rise of ‘coding bootcamps’ where students get a crash course on programming in weeks rather than months or years. As those programs have risen in popularity among high school kids, it also caught the attention of regulators who have recently taken a closer look at how those camps are run and what classification they fall under as an academic institution.

 

In recent weeks, California’s Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE) has issued ‘cease and desist’ orders to several coding camps, including Hackbright Academy, Hack Reactor and App Academy (along with a few others) in an effort to bring those institutions up to code. The BPPE is an offshoot of the California Department of Consumer Affairs (NOT the Department of Education) and is tasked at regulating private institutions of post or secondary education, which includes vocational schools and other academic institutions.  The problems seem to be that those programming bootcamps did not (or were not aware of the need to) register or apply for a license with the BPPE and are therefore not in compliance with regulations and guidelines set forth by the regulatory commission. Those bootcamps were issued the C&D orders, which stated either they comply with the guidelines or be forced to shut down and face a hefty fine of $50,000. To get a better understanding of the situation, online programs like Code.org are free to anyone who wants to learn the basics of programming while the coding bootcamps charge anywhere from $10,000 and upwards for a 10-week full-throttle course in specific programming languages. Regulation and oversight when it comes to that kind of money isn’t necessarily a bad thing, however the regulations set down by the BPPE are somewhat archaic in nature when it comes to the digital age. For example, if the institution offers a degree program (which most of those bootcamps do), they must have a library and other learning resources, complete with a professional librarian or information specialist. Suffice it to say, the Application for Approval to get those bootcamps up to regulation is staggering to say the least, which is putting those institutions under immense pressure as they attempt to continue to operate.

 

It should be noted that some of these programs incorporate diversity within their respective communities. For instance, Hackbright specializes in teaching women to code in an effort to gain a competitive edge in the job market. Bootcamps can also help many unemployed Californians find jobs, which could only bolster the state’s ailing economy. Many coding institutions in the state however, fear that they will become bankrupt and forced to close as the application process can take up to 18 months and during that time, no classes can be taken and prospective students cannot enroll, which costs the institutions their income. It should also be noted that those coding bootcamps usually have a job-placement program in conjunction with many of the top tech companies in the nation, such as Google, Facebook and even Microsoft, which many students will miss out on if these camps go under. Most of the institutions that received the cease and desist letters are working to comply with the regulations to get back to the business of teaching, which consists of a $5,000 application fee, course catalog and a performance fact sheet on student progress (among other things). While some may feel that these camps are being unjustly singled out, others feel that regulation is necessary in order to deter fraud, such as implying a ‘guaranteed job after graduation’ (only the military can do that). The question is, does this signal an end to the ever-growing coding camps or will it only serve to solidify their credibility and could that scrutiny transfer over to schools that have implemented their own coding courses?

 

C

See more news at:

http://twitter.com/Cabe_Atwell

  • Sign in to reply
  • DAB
    DAB over 11 years ago in reply to johnbeetem

    Perhaps, but it does solidify the organized teaching institutions grasp on education.

    I agree that degree mills are bad, which is why I proposed a guild system, where only those people who qualify are allowed to work in the industry.

    If I had a dollar for every person who claimed to be a software developer without any idea about software engineering, just coding a single language, I would be a very wealthy man.

     

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • johnbeetem
    johnbeetem over 11 years ago in reply to DAB

    DAB wrote:

     

    This post identifies the power of the teachers union.

    They fear that any alternative education will jeopardize their jobs and pay, so they want to strangle any form of "learning" with bureaucracy and impediments.

    I don't think this has anything to do with unions.  [Update: BPPE was signed into law in 2009, so that would have been under Arnold Schwartzenegger, so blame him if you're going to blame someone.]  According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Bureau_for_Private_Postsecondary_Education), the purpose of the California BPPE is "to prevent fraudulent diploma mills", for which California was famous in the 1980s.  It's supposed to protect consumers.

     

    However, like a lot of laws originally designed for a good purpose, BPPE overreaches and has unintended consequences.  It's also very difficult to change California law for the better.  As my favorite version of the Otto von Bismarck quote goes: "People who like sausage or public policy should not watch either being made."

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 11 years ago in reply to DAB

    Hi DAB, good points. I agree it looks like some beaurocracy needs to be removed, to allow new ways of learning, especially if it is free (the Internet and collaboration allows education costs to scale right down for individuals who can make use of it).

    In the UK degree-level education was free (funded by everyone else from their tax contributions) for a long time, because there was an implied understanding that even if courses were not geared toward a job, there was still a great benefit to everybody if other people were educated to a degree level. In other words, you may not have a job, but you may one day encourage someone else's or your children to study and do something, even if the thing that you studied was not considered vocational enough in other people's eyes.

    Nowadays, even though students do not have to start paying until they are earning, it is still mentally a very big burden to give an 18-year old, for them to know that they will have to pay back many tens of thousands of dollars/pounds based on a decision they will make at 18 (actually at 16, when they start specialising in some subjects), even though there are some safeguards, but safeguards they cannot test until half a decade later... Anyway that was a bit of a digression.

    $5000 seems quite an excessive application fee. Are instututions mandated by the Bureau to charge that from their students, or did I misunderstand?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • DAB
    DAB over 11 years ago

    Hi Cabe,

     

    This post identifies the power of the teachers union.

    They fear that any alternative education will jeopardize their jobs and pay, so they want to strangle any form of "learning" with bureaucracy and impediments.

    I have given up on seeing any useful progress at that level.

     

    What I propose is that we form Technical Guilds to train the future technologists.  We can setup cooperative agreements with the industries that need specific skills and then take potential candidates through a training program that leads to a specific job.  We set up the fee structure such that the student pays no up front costs, but then pay off their apprentice costs over time from the money they earn working.  It should be easy to set this up at the local level and keep control via specific contracts with the businesses in need of talent.

     

    By keeping everything private, we avoid the government interference and create immediate opportunity for all concerned.

     

    Just a thought,

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube