Hi Cabe.
I have to side with Gordon - "studies" aren't created equal, as 70% of people realize. I'm also reminded of the Dilbert cartoon where a new worker claims to be father of the internet. When questioned, he says "Sure I am - give me five minutes then check Wikipedia!".
Seriously though, I find the manufacturer sites plus a few select magazines best for me. Plus I've specialized to a large degree in satellite comm's so my written texts are Roddy's and Richardson's texts. For component level work (which I do less and less now, sadly), I wing it (or should I say, fall back on my expertise), use IEEE sources, or sources as per above. And yes, even the ARRL handbook, my original tutor - still great after all these years! I also have what remains of my personal library of app notes, schematics and data (much lost in one international move). But I can't recommend too highly a well-stocked favourites toolbar - can be tailored to suit and you can print what you want off it (copyright notwithstanding).
Cheers.
Hi Cabe.
I have to side with Gordon - "studies" aren't created equal, as 70% of people realize. I'm also reminded of the Dilbert cartoon where a new worker claims to be father of the internet. When questioned, he says "Sure I am - give me five minutes then check Wikipedia!".
Seriously though, I find the manufacturer sites plus a few select magazines best for me. Plus I've specialized to a large degree in satellite comm's so my written texts are Roddy's and Richardson's texts. For component level work (which I do less and less now, sadly), I wing it (or should I say, fall back on my expertise), use IEEE sources, or sources as per above. And yes, even the ARRL handbook, my original tutor - still great after all these years! I also have what remains of my personal library of app notes, schematics and data (much lost in one international move). But I can't recommend too highly a well-stocked favourites toolbar - can be tailored to suit and you can print what you want off it (copyright notwithstanding).
Cheers.