element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Embedded and Microcontrollers
  • Technologies
  • More
Embedded and Microcontrollers
Embedded Forum OO Digital Pin class: single class or separate in and out classes
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Embedded and Microcontrollers to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 37 replies
  • Subscribers 462 subscribers
  • Views 4498 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

OO Digital Pin class: single class or separate in and out classes

Jan Cumps
Jan Cumps over 2 years ago

I'm experimenting with light-weight C++ for microcontrollers. Looking for your opinion for class(es) that represent GPIO pin behaviour

An output pin can

  • accept a value and set it
  • return the value it is set to
  • maybe go high-z

An input can:

  • return the value at its input

I may represent this

  • very simple as a single class.
    Getting the value would perform the "return" action above. The class would decide if it returns output state or input state internally
    Setting would only succeed if the pin is an output pin, else either throw an exception or silently ignore.
    Switching between the two would be simple
  • as separate classes
    out type pin would set the output as indicated, and return the output state if asked
    in type pin would return the value at its input. It would not provide setters.
    Switching between two modes would mean discarding the original object and creating one of the other kind.
    (should both classes inherit from a common parent that defines the actual pin?)

How would you solve this, as OO designer / abstractor that loves simplicity?

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • shabaz
    shabaz over 2 years ago in reply to michaelkellett +3
    The compiler was way better than I thought... I gave it a shot with the GNU compiler for ARM, using the Pi Pico SDK. I created a simple class: Then that class is used in the main() function. The…
  • ggabe
    ggabe over 2 years ago +2
    Take a look at WiringPi, as an example how the single class API can be structured: http://wiringpi.com/reference/ I like how it can abstract MCU GPIO and IO expanders under the same API. if you need…
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 2 years ago +2
    On the basis of your points above, what you are essentially describing is a variable: you can set a value and you can read a value. I don't think that would benefit from being encapsulated by a class and…
Parents
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 2 years ago
    Andrew J said:
    On the basis of your points above, what you are essentially describing is a variable: you can set a value and you can read a value.  I don't think that would benefit from being encapsulated by a class and methods

    I'm not trying to encapsulate a variable. I'm trying to make GPIO pins act as if they are a variable.

    You can set state by setting the value:

    drive LED pin high:

    led = true;

    You can get current state (both out and in), by reading the value:

    read LED or button pin:

    state = led;

    state = button;

    led != led; // toggle led

    led = button; // adapt led to the state of the button

    While they act as variables, in the background they call the microcontroller APIs and write / read different registers.

    Examples of the implementation of the "set" and "get":

    IO &IO::operator= (bool high) {
    	R_GPIO_PinWrite(this->pin, (gpio_level_t)high);
    	return *this;
    }
    
    IO &IO::operator!= (IO &rhs) {
    	R_GPIO_PinWrite(this->pin, (gpio_level_t)!((bool)rhs));
    	return *this;
    }
    
    IO::operator bool() const {
    	gpio_level_t l = R_GPIO_PinRead(this->pin);
    	return (bool) l;
    }
    

    In essence, I abstracted gpio pins, that are controlled via several registers, into a single boolean "variable".

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 2 years ago
    Andrew J said:
    On the basis of your points above, what you are essentially describing is a variable: you can set a value and you can read a value.  I don't think that would benefit from being encapsulated by a class and methods

    I'm not trying to encapsulate a variable. I'm trying to make GPIO pins act as if they are a variable.

    You can set state by setting the value:

    drive LED pin high:

    led = true;

    You can get current state (both out and in), by reading the value:

    read LED or button pin:

    state = led;

    state = button;

    led != led; // toggle led

    led = button; // adapt led to the state of the button

    While they act as variables, in the background they call the microcontroller APIs and write / read different registers.

    Examples of the implementation of the "set" and "get":

    IO &IO::operator= (bool high) {
    	R_GPIO_PinWrite(this->pin, (gpio_level_t)high);
    	return *this;
    }
    
    IO &IO::operator!= (IO &rhs) {
    	R_GPIO_PinWrite(this->pin, (gpio_level_t)!((bool)rhs));
    	return *this;
    }
    
    IO::operator bool() const {
    	gpio_level_t l = R_GPIO_PinRead(this->pin);
    	return (bool) l;
    }
    

    In essence, I abstracted gpio pins, that are controlled via several registers, into a single boolean "variable".

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 2 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps

    So you are doing more than just setting and reading values!  Clever way of doing it - I'm just not that good with C++.  Out of curiosity, how do the examples look without this C++ class?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 2 years ago in reply to Andrew J

    Hi Andrew,

    Quite a lot of microcontrollers have got complicated registers just to do a port action. I've not looked at the Renesas RX microcontroller that Jan is using, but for the Renesas RA microcontrollers, it uses 32-bit registers where each output is controlled by two bits, in the lower and the upper 16-bits, depending on if the desire is to set the output high or low (this is so that with the two bits there is effectively a mask capability, so that outputs that are not desired to be controlled can remain in a state without needing to first read the register and then ORing or ANDing, i.e. it's faster since no extra read is needed, nor any local variable storing the entire port state). Also with RA, completely separate registers are used for read operations.

    Regarding reading output ports, it was valid in some older microcontrollers, e.g. 8051 had an system which was quite neat in some ways; some ports had pull-ups (like I2C) that could be enabled, but a read would show the physical signal level on the pin, i.e. if an external circuit was pulling the output low. I can't recall if it was allowed to be used like that or not, it's been ages since I've used it!, but it was nice that everything was easy to do with very few register operations.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 2 years ago in reply to Andrew J
    Andrew J said:
    Out of curiosity, how do the examples look without this C++ class?

    example using Renesas register / bit mapping

    #define R_LED1_On() (PORTH.PODR.BIT.B2 = 0)

    #define R_LED1_Off() (PORTH.PODR.BIT.B2 = 1)

    Example with their HAL API:

    R_GPIO_PinWrite(GPIO_PORT_H_PIN_2, state ? GPIO_LEVEL_HIGH : GPIO_LEVEL_LOW);

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube