Hi,
I am looking for a way to use arduino or raspberry Pi to detect Chemical Elements in water, but not sure how to do it or where to start.
I have both plus mac and Windows server.
this is a new project and need some advice.
Mick
Be sure to click 'more' and select 'suggest as answer'!
If you're the thread creator, be sure to click 'more' then 'Verify as Answer'!
Hi,
I am looking for a way to use arduino or raspberry Pi to detect Chemical Elements in water, but not sure how to do it or where to start.
I have both plus mac and Windows server.
this is a new project and need some advice.
Mick
Hi Michael,
Interesting idea, but you need to do some research as to the specific types of chemicals you want to detect.
Your sensor selection will be determined by the chemicals and the levels of concentration that you want to monitor/detect.
You might want to start with a salt taster circuit using the resistivity of the water to indicate different levels of salt in the water.
It is a simple circuit to make and it will give you experience in working with a simple sensor.
From there, you need to research the various chemicals you want to look for and identify affordable sensors to detect them.
DAB
Hi Dab,
I was basically thinking about all chemicals in the periodic table.
Regards
Michael
Ah, you might want to wait, as I am currently writing a book where I completely change the Periodic table based upon my new Atomic Model.
In the book I explain why Deuterium and Tritium were excluded and how there are lots of other variations of the elements that the current table just ignores.
As for detecting each element, that will be best done by atomic weight.
The idea of a mix of protons and neutrons is incorrect, as is the idea that electrons orbit the nucleus in many layers.
I will expand on these ideas later, but just be aware that what you thought you knew about atoms is going to change.
DAB
Wow. That's a very tall order! If you genuinely want to test for every element, the only way I could think to do that would be heating the sample to a plasma and analyzing the emission spectrum. That's a pretty heavy duty proposition involving some very expensive equipment to do it properly. My wife does ICP mass spectrometry to test for metals in soil and water samples, and the equipment she uses runs into tens of thousands of dollars even without support contracts, a supply of consumables, etc. An ICP/M-S will typically have a full computer built into it running specialized a LIMS (laboratory information management software) package.
If you're looking to identify compounds instead of just base elements (which would likely give you more useful information), now you're talking about an entire laboratory. Different processes and equipment are used to test for different compounds, so now you're talking about hiring a staff of chemists, not something that you can do in your garage with an Arduino.
If you want to test for biologicals, that's a whole other layer on top of that involving multi-day sample digestion, more consumables, more equipment, and more people.
I don't mean to be a nay-sayer, but until we have some sci-fi level nanotechnology I don't think it's feasible to duplicate the functions of an entire well-funded environmental laboratory using a single board computer. :-(
I don't know. I do know my E=IR & E=mc2. the problem is when we talk about the flow of electrons (E) in a wire. you have this little electron called a and a 1 foot of 14 gauge wire. And at one end we put a battery 10 volts and we put in series with the wire a 1k ohm resistor. now solve for I through the circuit. I = E * R [ I = 10/1000] ::= I = 0.01 amps. Now this works universally unless we talk about superconductors. and of course, we discount any R of the wire itself. Therefore we have to assume (lots of trouble) that current/electrons flows at the Speed of Light, and not talk about the velocity of e through a wire.
Cris
Ah but do you see E = m c^2 as it permits the exchange of mass to energy or energy to mass?
Or is it stating that all energy depends on mass, with a maximum energy attained when the speed of the mass reaches c?
My view is the second one. Which means that there can be no forms of massless energy.
Further, we have all been told that electrons are exchanged between atoms to support current flow.
However, what I have defined is the mechanism by which what has been called electron flow, is actually the transfer of photons between the atoms. You can get the same effective mass and charge transfer without destroying the integrity of the atom itself. Also, the photon transfer is consistent with all forms of mass and energy exchange between atoms in all conditions.
Under these conditions, the speed of light becomes the fastest transfer rate of a photon from one atom to another. As Einstein stated, he was only trying to establish a speed limit for how things in the universe can change.
What makes resistors so interesting is that their function is to limit the amount of mass/energy through the material by inhibiting the movement of photons from atom to atom. The impurities in the material cause some of the photons to dislodge IR photons, thus generating the heat normally associated with a resistor.
So far all of my analysis supports what we know about the universe, it just refines our understanding as to what really happens at the atomic level.
DAB
Ah but do you see E = m c^2 as it permits the exchange of mass to energy or energy to mass?
Or is it stating that all energy depends on mass, with a maximum energy attained when the speed of the mass reaches c?
My view is the second one. Which means that there can be no forms of massless energy.
Further, we have all been told that electrons are exchanged between atoms to support current flow.
However, what I have defined is the mechanism by which what has been called electron flow, is actually the transfer of photons between the atoms. You can get the same effective mass and charge transfer without destroying the integrity of the atom itself. Also, the photon transfer is consistent with all forms of mass and energy exchange between atoms in all conditions.
Under these conditions, the speed of light becomes the fastest transfer rate of a photon from one atom to another. As Einstein stated, he was only trying to establish a speed limit for how things in the universe can change.
What makes resistors so interesting is that their function is to limit the amount of mass/energy through the material by inhibiting the movement of photons from atom to atom. The impurities in the material cause some of the photons to dislodge IR photons, thus generating the heat normally associated with a resistor.
So far all of my analysis supports what we know about the universe, it just refines our understanding as to what really happens at the atomic level.
DAB