element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Power & Energy
  • Technologies
  • More
Power & Energy
Forum The Challenge for Green Energy: How to Store Excess Electricity
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Quiz
  • Documents
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 288 subscribers
  • Views 812 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • alternative_energy
  • wind
  • freescale
  • alternative
  • electricity
  • storage
  • Alternative Energy Tags
  • hybrid_vehicle
  • battery
  • grid
  • fuel_cell
  • energy_storage
  • solar
Related

The Challenge for Green Energy: How to Store Excess Electricity

GregC
GregC over 13 years ago

Extracted from the publication of Jon R. Luoma on YALE environment 360 website July 13th 2009

 

For years, the stumbling block for making renewable energy practical and dependable has been how to store electricity for days when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing. But new technologies suggest this goal may finally be within reach.

 

For decades, “grid parity” has been the Holy Grail for alternative energy. The rap from critics was that technologies like wind and solar could not compete, dollar-for-dollar, with conventional electricity sources, such as coal and nuclear, without large government tax breaks or direct subsidies. But suddenly, with rapid technological advances and growing economies of manufacturing scale, wind power is now nearly at grid parity - meaning it costs roughly the same to generate electricity from wind as it does from coal. And the days when solar power attains grid parity may be only a half-decade away.

 

So with grid parity now looming, finding ways to store millions of watts of excess electricity for times when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine is the new Holy Grail.

 

New storage approaches include improvements to existing lithium ion batteries and schemes to store energy as huge volumes of compressed air in vast geologic vaults. Another idea is to create a network of small, energy-dense batteries in tens of millions of homes. Under such a “distributed storage” scheme, utility computers could coordinate electricity flows over a “smart grid” that continually communicates with — and adjusts the flow of power to and from — local batteries. This would even include batteries in future plug-in hybrid or all-electric vehicles.

 

And one 2008 breakthrough could even fulfill chemists’ long-held dreams of producing a squeaky-clean and storable fuel by using excess electricity generated from renewable sources to cheaply produce hydrogen, which could then be used in fuel cells to power homes and cars.

 

One storage approach seems obvious: to improve battery technologies. Picture efficient, enormous batteries that can store tens of millions of watt-hours of juice. Today, the vast majority of new rooftop solar photovoltaic panels are connected to the grid, using it as a giant battery, pushing excess power onto the grid when solar panels provide excess power. The building then draws power from the grid when the sun doesn’t shine, with its meter spinning backward and forward with the ebb and flow of power. With relatively few solar roofs yet in play, utilities manage any ebb and flow by drawing down and ramping up generation at conventional power plants designed to balance fluctuating supply and demand.

 

A more robust world of solar and wind power might be better served by some sort of giant battery — or, more likely, many of them, widely distributed. The basic concept has been proven. Since 2003, the world’s largest battery backup has been storing energy for an entire city: Fairbanks, Alaska. Isolated as it is, and not part of any regional electricity grid, the metropolitan area of about 100,000 residents needs an electricity backstop more than most: In its sub-zero winters, pipes can freeze solid in as little as two hours. Six years ago, the city installed a huge nickel-cadmium battery, the same technology used for years in laptop computers and other portable devices. Housed in a giant warehouse, the 1,300-metric ton battery is larger than a football field, and can crank out 40 million watts of power. Still, the Fairbanks battery provides only enough electricity for about 12,000 residents for seven minutes. That was enough to prevent 81 blackouts in the city in the battery’s first two years of operation.

 

Still in pie-in-sky mode, there’s “vehicle to grid” storage, or “carbitrage.” This enticing notion relies on idled storage in the batteries of the millions of plug-in hybrid or all-electric automobiles that will be in use in the future. There’s reason to believe this scheme could work. More than 90 percent of the time cars sit idled, and aside from days they’re used for long trips, most of their full energy storage capacity goes unused.

 

A single idle, electric-powered car could generate as much as 10 kilowatts of power, enough to meet the average demand of 10 houses, according to Willett Kempton, director of the Center for Carbon-free Power Integration at the University of Delaware. With vehicle-to-grid technology, controlled by an array of smart meters, car owners plugged in at home or work could allow the grid to draw off unused chunks of power at times when short-term demand is high. Conversely, cars could be recharged when demand is low.

 

If advanced batteries or ultracapacitors aren’t the ultimate answer, maybe using excess electricity to make hydrogen that can be stored will do the trick. Hydrogen can be produced through simple electrolysis, but technical and cost hurdles have made electrolysis impractical. Today, industrial-scale hydrogen is produced using natural gas as a not-so-clean feedstock.

 

And there is progress being made on an entirely different front — using excess electricity to pump compressed air into caverns, salt domes, and old natural gas wells, and then releasing the air to help state-of-the-art natural gas power plants spin turbines, lowering the amount of fuel consumed by as much as 70 percent. A consortium of utilities in Iowa, Minnesota, and the Dakotas is already working with the U.S.’s Sandia National Laboratories to develop a giant, 268-megawatt compressed air system. Called the Iowa Stored Energy Park, it would store excess energy from the region’s burgeoning wind industry.

 

Read the complete entry from  Jon R. Luoma on YALE environment 360 website

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
Parents
  • YT2095
    YT2095 over 13 years ago

    I`v always thought that Pumping water Uphill was a good idea for energy storage, there`s a place in Wales that does exactly that, and it works really rather nicely 0488.contentimage_1.png

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 13 years ago in reply to YT2095

    There's quite a few pumped storage facilities.  There's one near me in Ludington, MI

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Pavel.Simon
    Pavel.Simon over 13 years ago in reply to Former Member

    I live not far from another in Slovakia: http://g.co/maps/ea5qv there is 736 MW peak power. Description: http://goo.gl/xxtQu but only in Slovak.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Pavel.Simon
    Pavel.Simon over 13 years ago in reply to Former Member

    I live not far from another in Slovakia: http://g.co/maps/ea5qv there is 736 MW peak power. Description: http://goo.gl/xxtQu but only in Slovak.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 13 years ago in reply to Pavel.Simon

    The peak power capacity of the Welsh pumped storage facility is about 2GW (2,000,000 kW) which can be activated in a couple of seconds.  The first big use of it reported in 1981 was when everyone in England who was watching the Royal Wedding on TV switched on electric kerttles at the same time, in a TV interval.  Electricity demand skyrocketed and required a couple of extra GW for a couple of minutes.

     

    Suppose that we wanted to double the effective storage capacity of that national grid.  I built a circuit with less than $3 worth of components which was enough for my computer to reliably detect when network frequency went above 50.1Hz (time to switch on low priority battery chargers, prewarm kettles, and prewarm the household) and it would also detect when network frequency went below 49.9 Hz (time to switch off medium priority kettles and fridges).  The setup would work better if it used a governer equation to set power of a resistive load such as a kettle heating element, and has the potential to do what smart grids are touted as being capable of.

     

    The reason why I did not go into production making standalone 3kW demand management switches containg less than $10 of components including the relay is that utility companies do not publish a lower price for electricity whilst the grid is above 50.1 Hz or a higher price whilst the grid is below 49.9 Hz, so there is no incentive for consumers to adopt the simplest technology.

     

    Prices in realtime and yesterdays' spot price by-the-second could be published.  What do the utility companies think?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 13 years ago in reply to Former Member

    This sounds quite interesting really and I'd be interested in seeing any schematics on it as I'm interested in demand side management of electricity for both the interests of businesses/home owners as well as that of the gridso there is no incentive for consumers to adopt the simplest technology.

     

    Saying that though, I don't think the majority of consumers understand, never mind feel the want to be incentivised to take up these technologies. In order for the frequency of the grid to be shifted it would require more than a few households turning on (or off) kettles to significantly affect it, especially seeing as when the frequency shifts it affects the entire grid so it means there is a significant change required to shift it back to the normal. What I'm saying is that if it's not a 'forced' system, one that's incentivised, I don't believe enough people would take it up for it to be effective. Even with cost inventives and near realtime information, people just aren't that interested in micromanaging their energy that much.

     

    So this then leads onto the smart grid and instead of incentivising but providing the technology to help support the grid by demand side management as part of a larger scheme, something that would have more impact. But should the smartgrid have that much control over our appliances? I know I'd be pretty annoyed if my kettle was turned off when I needed/wanted it, just because every other person on my street wanted to use their kettle at the same time. Okay, okay, I understand that that's not what would happen, because, well, the British would revolt without their tea. Granted I don't believe such micromanaging on by the grid would be a welcomed idea, something along those lines is required to aid the grid as it becomes under further strain.

     

    It's a fascinating topic and I'd certainly like to hear more about your demand side management insights D2113F, and please by all means correct me on anything I may have got wrong!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • michaelkellett
    michaelkellett over 13 years ago in reply to Former Member

    The rational way to manage demand is for the consumer's (doemstic or probably industrial at first) system to automatically negotiate with the grid for power. You would obviously keep your kettle going even when the power was expensive but might well defer running the dishwasher until the middle of the night when the power was cheap. Some big industrial users could probably defer power use for days at a time if the pricing made it effective to do so. This is probably the only way that wind power can be used to make up a significant proportion of the total national generating capacity.

    It can't be done by frequency altering - it needs dialogue (can be automated).

    Unfortunately the "smart meters" being foisted upon us do not support this concept or anything like it.

     

    Michael Kellett

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube