element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Robotics
  • Technologies
  • More
Robotics
Forum Testing rear window defroster grid
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Robotics to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Replies 25 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 63 subscribers
  • Views 6493 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • plc
  • testing
  • sensors
  • automation
Related

Testing rear window defroster grid

Former Member
Former Member over 10 years ago

Hello,

I would like to develop a testing method to detect window defroster grid failures. Rear windows has 12 heating wires painted to the glass and cca. 2% are faulty pieces.

I tried to measure the resistance, current and voltage drop of good parts and compare results with those where was at least 1 broken wire, but the difference was smaller than the tolerance specified by the supplier. (Other problem is that the resistance is greatly depending on the temperature)

Now we are testing visually with a thermo foil but it takes more time and sometimes the operator mistakes or can forget to correctly check thermo foil. It is also very important to not hurt parts during the testing process, so best option would be contactless testing if possible... image

I'am thinking about to make a tool with 12 sensors, 1 sensor to every each heating wire to sense a flowing current in a wire. But I'am not sure that there is any sensor avaible in the market for such a purpose. Finally PLC have to check the outputs of every sensors, if all the 12 wires are good (current is flowing through them) gives visual signal or in case of failure sound alarm or red light flashing.

 

Here is the specification of rear window defroster:

Power: 167,37W ±10%
Current: 12,87A ±1A
Resistance: 1,0 Ohm -10%/+20%
Wire thickness: 0,48mm
In the attachment you can find technical drawing of the window.

Any ideas and suggestions are welcome.

Best regards,

Ate

Attachments:
image
  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • Robert Peter Oakes
    Robert Peter Oakes over 10 years ago +2
    IF money is not too much of an issue then a thermal camera would instantly show you the broken wire this may set you back 1000$ but would return that pretty quickly in time saved
  • jw0752
    jw0752 over 10 years ago +2 suggested
    Hi Iansm, I had some time this evening and decided to breadboard and test the one Hall Effect device I have in my build stock: SS49E Here is a link to the Newark listing: http://www.newark.com/webapp/wcs…
  • Robert Peter Oakes
    Robert Peter Oakes over 10 years ago +2
    Sticking with my suggestion of Hall effect sensors and Johns excelent testing of such, but thinking about the low signal to noise ratio, one option would be to significantly increase the current... AKA…
Parents
  • jw0752
    0 jw0752 over 10 years ago

    Hi Lansm

    I have a heat sensor that I use in the lab that has a very low mass thermistor. I suspect that it could be moved across a wire to detect if any heat was being produced. None of our solutions so far will tell you where in the wire there is a break, just that there is a break somewhere. I suspect that some sort of a capacitive sensor dragged along a broken wire might be able to detect the break where there is a potential gradient across the break but I have no empirical experience with this.

    John

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • mcb1
    0 mcb1 over 10 years ago in reply to jw0752

    A strip of thermal paper across the screen might work.

    We use thermal printers for Flight Strips and they are reasonbly sensitive.

     

    Mark

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    0 shabaz over 10 years ago in reply to mcb1

    I think Ate is saying that the operator forgets to visually check the strip (or there is a belief it could damage through contact - but I would have thought that would

    be a valid test), but it could all be automated, either with a visual camera examining the strip output, or FLIR has industrial thermal cams (e.g. just as an example, FLIR Axx series

    spotted at a trade show, but other models may be more suitable) and they have an API where you can select the region of interest for example.

    However, it costs (very high resolution might be needed to identify hot spots from a thinned out track, much like a CCTV camera has for it's field of view limited pixels) -

    the cost may be negligible for an industrial use-case though.

     

    There are cheaper ways for broken wire  - Panasonic has GRIDeye - twelve of the sensors, one aligned to each wire, would be sufficient to monitor the twelve wires are a

    cost of under $500, and low-cost microcontroller(s) would be sufficient to process the data (I2C).

    It would identify which of the 12 wires is not heating. There is also Melexis but I've had difficulty obtaining their products easily - although generally they work well from what I could tell.

    Also Honeywell and Omron Omron and GEGE (no longer available) have single-pixel or low count linear arrays of thermal imaging type sensors (thermopile).


    For a go/no-go indication for the entire window (e.g. if it is not for repair in a production line, but for complete replacement) where you may not care which of the 12 elements

    are faulty, I think any resonant circuit method could be worth a shot simply because it doesn't need a jig for thermal alignment, (and so is a quick and cheap method to

    eliminate quickly if it doesn't work) and possibly the easiest (with the LDC1000LDC1000) although this is a pure guess.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Reply
  • shabaz
    0 shabaz over 10 years ago in reply to mcb1

    I think Ate is saying that the operator forgets to visually check the strip (or there is a belief it could damage through contact - but I would have thought that would

    be a valid test), but it could all be automated, either with a visual camera examining the strip output, or FLIR has industrial thermal cams (e.g. just as an example, FLIR Axx series

    spotted at a trade show, but other models may be more suitable) and they have an API where you can select the region of interest for example.

    However, it costs (very high resolution might be needed to identify hot spots from a thinned out track, much like a CCTV camera has for it's field of view limited pixels) -

    the cost may be negligible for an industrial use-case though.

     

    There are cheaper ways for broken wire  - Panasonic has GRIDeye - twelve of the sensors, one aligned to each wire, would be sufficient to monitor the twelve wires are a

    cost of under $500, and low-cost microcontroller(s) would be sufficient to process the data (I2C).

    It would identify which of the 12 wires is not heating. There is also Melexis but I've had difficulty obtaining their products easily - although generally they work well from what I could tell.

    Also Honeywell and Omron Omron and GEGE (no longer available) have single-pixel or low count linear arrays of thermal imaging type sensors (thermopile).


    For a go/no-go indication for the entire window (e.g. if it is not for repair in a production line, but for complete replacement) where you may not care which of the 12 elements

    are faulty, I think any resonant circuit method could be worth a shot simply because it doesn't need a jig for thermal alignment, (and so is a quick and cheap method to

    eliminate quickly if it doesn't work) and possibly the easiest (with the LDC1000LDC1000) although this is a pure guess.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube