Actions
Engagement
  • Author Author: element14Dave
  • Date Created: Date Created
  • Last Updated Last Updated:
  • Views 5962 views
  • Likes 1 like
  • Comments 100 comments
Related
Recommended

Vote for Your Favorite Robot!

We don't yet know who will win the USA-Japan robot challenge, but that doesn't mean we can't talk about our all time favorite robots!

 

Who is the best fictional robot of all time?

 

*Don't forget to click the "vote" button below to make your vote count!

 

Did we forget to include your favorite robot? Let us know in the comments below. We'll send out some element14 goodies for the best comments, arguments and rationale! image

ale!

Parents Comment Children
  • in reply to dgreen

    Not so true Daniel.

     

    Replican biological aspects was intentionally an important aspect of them in the Film version but in the original view of the author Philip K. *** replicants are "androids". Maybe we will discuss if androids are or are not "robots"... The original novel title is "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" and some changes may have sense: Ridley Scott never finished reading the P.K.*** novel but started making "Blade Runner" film before. In fact P.K. *** never saw the film as he died by a stroke just few months before the film was ready.

     

    Enrico

  • in reply to balearicdynamics

    In the book, as in the movie, the only way to tell a replicant from a human was by giving them an empathy test.  If they were mechanical, instead of biological, it would have been a lot easier to tell them apart.  Some other people have also suggested that the human looking cylons in Battlestar Galactica were robots, but they could mate with humans and produce viable offspring, so they were clearly biological.

  • in reply to dgreen

    Daniel,

     

    you are right about replicants. I mean that we can assume they as "robots" (following the concept of automa) just because in the view of PKD these were. Then I agree that the distance of replicants to humans is veeery thick ...