element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Wireless
  • Technologies
  • More
Wireless
Blog Amateur Two-Way Radio
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Polls
  • Quiz
  • Events
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Wireless to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: gervasi
  • Date Created: 19 Jun 2013 1:17 AM Date Created
  • Views 725 views
  • Likes 1 like
  • Comments 5 comments
  • two_way_communications
  • amateur_radio
Related
Recommended

Amateur Two-Way Radio

gervasi
gervasi
19 Jun 2013

imageEarlier this week I wrote about the two-way radio show I attended.  Handling the high-end radios designed for commercial and public safety use reminded me of how twenty years ago my friends and I in used to use these radios as ham radios. 

 

Motorola was the undisputed best in ruggedness.  Stories abounded about their continuing to work normally after having been dropped from high towers on to concrete, briefly submerged in water, or hit by a car. 

 

I reached out to some of the amateur radio operators (hams) who introduced me to the benefits of commercial-grade equipment over twenty years ago.  It turns out commercial-grade equipment is more common among hams today than it was in the 90s.

 

Analog FM is spectrally inefficient, but there is no standard digital communication mode for amateur radio.  The most common one is D-STAR.  Many hams are dissatisfied with its audio quality and audio artifacts it produces during signal fades.  Some are beginning to use NXDN (sometimes known by Kenwood's name for it, NEXTEDGE), DRM, and P25-- the standards used by commercial two-way vendors. 

 

The reps at last week's show mentioned DRM's ability to have two time slots on the same frequency several times.  Commercial users with one frequency pair would most like have already acquired another pair if they needed two channels, so this is a feature looking for a problem.  For hams, though, the feature solves a real problem.  In the past decade it has become common for local amateur radio repeaters to be connected to the Internet, allowing users to connect the repeater to local repeaters in distant cities.  Repeaters are on local bands and are traditionally used for local communication.  In DRM repeaters, one time slot can be allocated to the Internet link leaving the other channel free for local-only traffic. 

 

Separate from the issue of which digital standard to use is the issue of the quality of the equipment.  Commercial radio equipment is usually superior to equipment marketed to hobbyists.   The reps at General Communications promoted Harris as the new high-end vendor, but my network of hams says they're very good, but Motorola still reigns as the best. 

 

The days of hams inventing new radio techniques that are later adopted for commercial use are long gone.  But it still seems hams are putting to full use technologies that commercial and public safety users are being sold on but are not using.

 

In the 80s and 90s hams used their radios to place local phone calls while away from home and to talk to friends and relatives in distant cities.  A ham who used the amateur bands only for those purposes risked being branded a “lid”.  I suspect hams are adopting commercial equipment more because the Internet and mobile phones have taken away those casual users, leaving mostly diehards who appreciate the technology for its own sake. 

  • Sign in to reply
  • gervasi
    gervasi over 12 years ago in reply to M0DCD

    Until the early 90s, you had to copy 5wpm code to get the Technician license required for any voice operation, including VHF and UHF.  When they created a no-code tech license, some repeaters started sounding a little less formal, with some people using them as an inexpensive mobile phone.  At this time mobile phones were all analog and expensive.  The test was (and still is) four-option multiple choice with no penalty for wrong answers and 70% considered passing.  The exact question pool was publish.  So if you skimmed the question pool so thaty you recognized even some of them and could make good guesses, anyone could pass.

     

    At the time I thought the no-code tech was a bad idea, but now I'm fine letting more people in, esp since there are so many other things people can play with if we make it too hard.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 12 years ago in reply to Problemchild

    QRP is fairly popular (as is QRPp - using milliwatts rather than up to QRP's 5 watts output)

     

    Take a look at:http://www.qrparci.org/

    /http://www.gqrp.com/

    http://www.amqrp.org/

     

    And don't forget the radio amateurs who are using a Raspberry Pi with the only additions an antenna (and a filter!) as a WSPR beacon - a huge 10mW output http://hackaday.com/2013/03/21/wspr-transmitter-shows-true-value-of-raspberry-pi-for-hacking/

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • M0DCD
    M0DCD over 12 years ago

    You've got it one about these modes not being adopted. There isn't a single digital standard, and DSTAR being based on a particular commercial codec means it comes at a premium and from only a small pool of suppliers. Cost has been a factor, you pay quite a premium for a radio and then it's not much use if you can't make any contacts with it.

    Repurposed commercial geat has all but vanished from the market, it's either disposed of to prevent misuse or is beyond economical repair, such as P25 never caught on over here. Mind you, some of the ham radios are now much less "amateur" than they were before.

    Possibly because some of these modes depend on having some infrastructure behind them does discourage some "purists" from using them.

    We've never been allowed phone patches in the UK, but I suppose Echolink and IRLP come close to this.

    As for getting a licence, for a basic grade licence (US Technician or UK Foundation) it's actually got a little easier with time.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Problemchild
    Problemchild over 12 years ago in reply to DAB

    I see a few local folk who are experimenting with low power QRP modes and new low bandwidth codecs and generally pushing the boundries.

    I suppose that it all depends on the type of people the local group attrracts we are lucky to have one of the best groups in the country TDARS.

    Their site is a bit primitive looking but informative.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • DAB
    DAB over 12 years ago

    Nice Blog,

     

    It took me back to my younger days when wireless communication was less defined than it is today.

     

    I agree that the hobby/vocation was much more technically intense than it is today.

    I did manage to get a 2nd Class FCC license back in the early 1970's, but the test was not for the unqualified person to take.

    I came close to passing the 1st Class license, but did not meet the minimum score.

     

    Still, it was a way to distinguish those who studied communications electronics from those who did not.

     

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube