element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      • Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Wireless
  • Technologies
  • More
Wireless
Blog Quantum Communications
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Polls
  • Quiz
  • Events
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Wireless to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: gervasi
  • Date Created: 30 Sep 2013 10:19 PM Date Created
  • Views 739 views
  • Likes 0 likes
  • Comments 5 comments
  • quantum_communications
Related
Recommended

Quantum Communications

gervasi
gervasi
30 Sep 2013

Quantum is the preferred adjective in space operas to ask the audience to suspend disbelief on something technical that doesn’t make sense.  If there is a scenario where you to have something, say “Communication”, but it would not make sense for communication to be possible in a given situation, you can just call it quantum communication.

 

Seeing “Quantum Communication” on the cover of last month’s IEEE Communications Magazine reminded me that the word actually means something.  image

 

Quantum communication exploits counterintuitive properties such as the  wave / particle duality of light.  To understand this, Dr. Imre Sandor, author of one of the papers in in last month’s IEEE Communication, suggests we start by envisioning a classical (non-quantum) communication system that communicates bits by sending horizontally or vertically polarized light, with one polarization representing a ‘0’ and the other a ‘1’.   A horizontal and vertical detector could detect the polarization and recover the bits.  We could even send intermediate angles to send more bits per symbol.  The amplitude detected would be the cosine of the angle between the polarization of the light and the detector. 

 

What if the light level is decreased to one photon (the smallest drop of light you can have) at a time?  The photon either activates the horizontal or vertical detector, not both.  If the photons arrive at a 45 degree angle to both detectors, the receiver will detect a random horizontal or vertical photon each time a photon is sent.  The result will be like a coin toss but "more random".  A coin’s eventual resting orientation may be too complicated to calculate while it’s spinning in the air, but the laws of motion describe its path and could predict its resting position if we had all the parameters.  Which detector a photon sets off, however, is truly random and unpredictable.

 

Consider the previous example where the sender encodes ‘0’s and ‘1’s as horizontal and vertical photons that are well aligned to a receiver’s detectors.  Imagine the channel is noisy and sometimes flips the horizontal and vertical components of photons, as in the diagram to the right.  This bit-flip interference is as a random as the thought experiment above, “more random” than a coin toss.  image

 

If we could construct a device, however, that can distinguish between photons at a +45 degree angle and those at a -45 degree angle, we can undo the effects of the bit-flip interference altogether.  A +45-degree photon [1 + j1] is unaffected by the bit-flip because its horizontal and vertical components are the same.  The bit-flip will transpose the components of a -45 degree photon [1 - j1], making it a 135 degree photon [-1 + j1].  A vector at a 135 degree is the same as a negative magnitude vector at -45 degrees.  If the detector can ignore the magnitude, and just look at the angle, it can correctly identify photons sent at +45 or -45, completely circumventing the bit-flip interference.

 

I cannot find information about the construction of such a device.  One article refers to early trials doing this over fiber optic cable but unfortunately without a footnote.  Most of the articles discuss using quantum effects for encryption.  Quantum effects also out to be useful for channel access schemes, which is one of the biggest problems in M2M wireless.  Something obscure like distributed channel access could end up being a killer app of quantum communication.

 

Conclusion

After reading articles and exchanging e-mails with one of the authors, quantum communication is only a little clearer to me than the space opera definition.  Fifteen years ago I thought MIMO was useful only in that it was easy to do in MATLAB if you needed something to write a paper on.  Now it cheaply implemented on many inexpensive Wi-Fi chipsets.  I’m curious to see if quantum communication follows the same path and just how much practical benefit, in terms of link budget, channel utilization, and encryption robustness, comes from these techniques.  

 

Further Reading (All are from the Aug 2013 edition of IEEE Communications Magazine and require IEEEXplore access.)

Guest Editorial: Quantum Communications - A quick summary of the applications of Quantum Communications

Quantum Communications: Explained for Communication Engineers - Takes you through several applications with simple analogies to things in the macroscopic world

Using Quantum Technologies to Improve Fiber Optic Communication Systems - Explains how quantum effects theoretically allow a system to exceed the Shannon Limit

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • Former Member
    Former Member over 12 years ago in reply to DAB +1
    DAB, Does your epiphany result in what would be described as a new "interpretation of quantum mechanics", where you do the same math as in the standard model, and get the same answers, such as for the…
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 12 years ago in reply to DAB

    DAB,

      Does your epiphany result in what would be described as a new "interpretation of quantum mechanics",

    where you do the same math as in the standard model, and get the same answers, such as for the mass of a proton?

    Wikipedia has a whole category of such interpretations here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics

     

    Or does your epiphany result in doing different math?   If so, do you get different answers,

    or get the same answers by a different method?  If you get different answers, are they in

    accordance with experimental measurements?  The answers from the standard model are

    considered to agree with experiment to a greater precision than just about any other

    scientific theory.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • DAB
    DAB over 12 years ago

    Hi Gervasi and Sheldon,

     

    What I uncovered in my research was an epiphany in understanding the real issues.

    When I approached the problem from a Systems Engineering perspective I found "errors" in the interpretation of both the equations and the resulting experimental data.

     

    Hysenberg did what he could with the technology he had available, but he missed a key element in analyzing his data.

     

    We will provide data that will make a correction to his conclusions and guidance for reaching true measurement capability.

     

    In my book, I will be defining a new way to interpret the data, which results in a very simple, measurable, and deterministic universe.

    You can understand why I am not sharing details in public until everything is in copywrite.

    After we publish, I will start a blog series here at Element 14 to explain and discuss the findings.

     

    Once you see what we found, you should rapidly see the implications for future research.

     

    More later.

     

    If you want to help me out, go to my July blog and send me a PM with your answers to the thirty questions I provided.  Your answers will help me gage what I need to do to explain the data.  Some of the answers are intuitive, but a good many are going to be changed.

     

    Yes these posts are just teesers for the book, but Element 14 will be the first open group to get access to the book and access to me for discussions, which everyone will enjoy.

     

    Until then,

     

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • sqkybeaver
    sqkybeaver over 12 years ago in reply to gervasi

    DAB, you have peaked my interest, I would love to hear what you have to say on this.

     

    I believe in the observer effect, mostly as a barrier to research. can we negate it?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • gervasi
    gervasi over 12 years ago in reply to DAB

    "So I would not spend a lot of time worrying about Quantum Theory.  It will shortly be corrected."

    Do you think it's impossible to violate the Shannon Limit?  Is it impossible to change one particle and observe the effect on a entagled particle.  I'd like to learn more about actual experiments if it's true.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • DAB
    DAB over 12 years ago

    My next book will bring a lot of clarification to what physicists call Quantum.

     

    I have claified what a Photon really is and I have resolved Hysenbergs Uncertainty Principle in the process of replacing all of Schrodingers probability issues.  The real universe is completely deterministic and my new theory accounts for all matter and energy.

     

    So I would not spend a lot of time worrying about Quantum Theory.  It will shortly be corrected.

     

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube