element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Fighting Germs
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Project14
  • Fighting Germs
  • More
  • Cancel
Fighting Germs
Blog Method of purifying indoor air
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Fighting Germs to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: koldun
  • Date Created: 5 Apr 2020 10:42 PM Date Created
  • Views 3708 views
  • Likes 6 likes
  • Comments 28 comments
  • fightinggermsch
  • covid-19
  • coronavirus
  • covid19
Related
Recommended

Method of purifying indoor air

koldun
koldun
5 Apr 2020
image

Fighting Germs

Enter Your Project for a Chance to Win a Thermal Imaging Camera, Germicidal UV Lamp, and a Shopping Cart with Matching Charity Donation!

Submit an EntrySubmit an Entry  Back to homepage image
Project14 Home
Monthly Themes
Monthly Theme Poll

 

You don't have permission to edit metadata of this video.
Edit media
x
image
Upload Preview
image

 

 

If any bacteria, viruses or other pathogens are already "hanging out" in the atmosphere of a room, then the task of removing them with the help of a filter is almost impossible. We can only pass a small portion of the air through the filter at a time. The rest of the air is constantly mixed with each other and therefore, when filtered, the concentration of micro-pollutants decreases very slowly on an inverted logarithmic scale. In the presence of a source of pollution, such as a person coughing or sneezing, the situation with difficulty of air filtration worsens to a catastrophic level. Therefore, it is proposed to transform the room itself into a certain analogue of the electrostatic filter. In a way, by placing electrodes indoors and creating a sufficient potential difference, of course, within a safe power limit, we electrify all the microparticles in the air and they will quickly settle on one of the electrodes. Importantly! It should be the process of electrostatic charging and not ionization.

 

image

 

 

Therefore, it will be almost absolutely safe for people in the middle of such a room. In order for the micro-pollution deposition process to occur as quickly as possible, it is suggested to periodically spray fine mist of water vapor. For example, place one of the electrodes under the ceiling in the same place to spray micro droplets of water. Then the charged droplets will quickly fall to the floor on the room, taking down with them literally everything in the air. People who are in this area at this time, such as the station lobby, will not feel any discomfort. For them, staying in such a location will resemble the situation "in the park immediately after a thunderstorm". If among the people will be carriers of pathogenic viruses, then all these viruses will instantly settle contained on the floor without the threat of getting into someone's lungs. The electrostatic field generator can be the Van de Graaf generator, or further modifications thereof. It will be very inexpensive in mass production (several plastic stamped parts), energy efficient (small electric motor) and extremely easy to install and operate. One of the electrodes will be the floor of the room itself, and the second electrode is suspended sheet of plastic with a wire "hedgehog" in the middle of the sheet, suspended on the ceiling of the room. Air humidifiers, which, if necessary (!), Will raise the intensity of the filter - virtually any standard humidifier. Due to the simplicity of the construction and the ease of installation, such a micropollutant precipitatior can be mounted by any qualified worker or electrician. In the case of sanitary treatment of the device, all its parts can be treated with almost any detergent. If necessary, you can add an electronic control unit that will monitor the operation of the proposed device. And once again the most important thing is that the process of electrostatic charging and not of ionization should take place.

 

UPD:

 

Let's consider the waiting room of a train station for 100 people. According to sanitary standards, the station's internal ventilation should provide them with an air exchange rate of 30 cubic meters of fresh air per person per hour. In our case, this would mean a total flow of 3,000 cubic meters per hour, equivalent to 50 cubic meters per minute or 0.833 cubic meters per second.

 

 

According to sanitary standards, the relative humidity should be in the range of 30-60%. Suppose natural humidity is 40% and we raise it to 50%. That is, our humidification of the air will  work under comfortable conditions. For a warm season, a relative humidity of 100% means that there are more than 22 grams of water per cubic meter of air. That is, our 10% increase in humidity means that we only spray little over 2 grams of water every second.

 

 

Practical use of sprayers shows that spraying water into fine mist of  droplets at a diameter of 1 micron (ie 1.0 E-6 m) is technically simple and energy-efficient. So, if you take a drop with a diameter of 1.0E-6m. then its volume will be approximately equal

 

 

V = ¾ * 3.14 * (0.5E-6)^3 = ~ 0.3E-18 cubic meters.

 

 

and the weight, respectively,

 

 

M = ~ 3.0E-14 kg

 

 

We have, as already said, sprayed 2 grams of water per second. This means that when spraying water into drops of 1 micron, we will be getting large amount of them every second, specifically:

 

 

N = ~ 6.7E12 microdroplets.

 

 

From the experience of operating the Chizhevsky chandelier, air ionizers, electrostatic filters, the current at the electrodes of the device is limited to the level of milli or microamperes. Let us have a current equal to 1 microampere (1E-6 A). Then a charge of 1 microcoulomb will flow into the electrode in 1 second.

 

 

The electron charge is = ~ = −1.6E-19 C,

 

 

Which in turn means that 1 coulomb is essentially 6.25E18 electrons.

 

 

That is, in 1 second, at a current of 1 microampere, 6.25E12 electrons per electrode.

 

 

At the same time, we sprayed about 6.7E12 drops of water. Which charged an average of 1 electron per drop. Which is a very realistic indicator - the mass of the droplet = ~ = 3.0E-14 kilograms, and the mass of the water molecule = ~ = 3.0E-26 kilograms, respectively, charge 1 additional electron at = ~ = 1.000.000.000.000 atoms - nothing extraordinary.

 

 

Now another aspect. The 100-passenger hall will have an area of 200 square meters. Let's imagine that our micro droplets are distributed throughout the hall area. We have 6.7E12 drops per 200 square meters, or 3.35E6 drops per square millimetre, or 3.35 drops per square micrometer. The droplet itself has a diameter of a micrometer. This means that within a few seconds, the entire volume of the waiting room is "combed" with micro-droplets between which no other droplet or dust can slip.

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • shabaz
    shabaz over 5 years ago +3
    Therefore, it will be absolutely safe for people in the middle of such a room Sorry, I can't see this being a correct statement. How can someone coughing or breathing out virus next to you be absolutely…
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 5 years ago in reply to koldun +3
    Hi Victor, The questions are for you to answer, not me. You're the one claiming it is "absolutely safe". How are you establishing absolute safety, given that a sneeze (your example in your response) could…
  • koldun
    koldun over 5 years ago +3
    Model suggests how airborne coronavirus particles spread in grocery store aisles https://www.livescience.com/how-coronavirus-spreads-grocery-stores.html?fbclid=IwAR2e6yl_GgXm6zi4NfftGkNnaPtB2tx2JsS_ICP…
Parents
  • maxpowerr
    maxpowerr over 5 years ago

    Hi Victor,

     

    Wet air is a mixture of gases - dry air and water vapor. Given that the density of dry air is 1.2 kg / m3 and the density of water vapor is 0.72 kg / m3, it becomes apparent that moist air is lighter than dry.

     

    In ventilation systems, this fact plays a big role. It is because of the fact that moist air is lighter than dry air, it is preferable to extract from the premises in the upper zone of the room (that is, under the ceiling).

     

    The moisture that a person releases through breathing and sweating evaporates with air, moisturizing him. Exhausted moist air is concentrated in the upper zone. Consequently, exhaust air must be drawn from the upper zone.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • koldun
    koldun over 5 years ago in reply to maxpowerr

    Everything that you said is quite logical. BUT! Only if the ventilation of the room is faulty. If the ventilation of the room works as expected, the air flow is from 20 to 30 cubic meters per hour. Which is equivalent to 5-8 liters per second. In fact - according to sanitary standards - a person with a lung volume of 4-5 liters should constantly breathe fresh air. And all exhaled air should be removed from the room.

     

    This means that only with absolutely malfunctioning ventilation will air humidity have a noticeable effect on its density.

     

    Our device raises humidity even less than human exhalation. So even with poorly functioning ventilation, this increase in relative humidity will not affect natural or artificial air flows. We just remove all pollution from these air currents.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • maxpowerr
    maxpowerr over 5 years ago in reply to koldun

    But will not these particles stick (or settle) to the person and his clothes?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • koldun
    koldun over 5 years ago in reply to maxpowerr

    Yes. Those particles that hang in the air sooner or later settle somewhere. Perhaps even on man’s clothes. And maybe on the person himself. But to settle on a person’s clothes is to infect a person with a probability of less than 1%, but to get into the lungs of a person is to infect a person with a probability of more than 99%.

     

     

    Our method does not guarantee 100%, but it reduces the likelihood of airborne transmission of the virus from person to person by 100 times, or maybe 100,000 times.

     

     

    However, if our method of electrostatic air purification is combined with other simple sanitary safety rules, then we could give a 100% guarantee. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • maxpowerr
    maxpowerr over 5 years ago in reply to koldun

    I came across an interesting study, maybe it will help you.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213340/

    Good luck.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • maxpowerr
    maxpowerr over 5 years ago in reply to koldun

    I came across an interesting study, maybe it will help you.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213340/

    Good luck.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube