element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Community Hub
Community Hub
Member Blogs A 1970 Power Amplifier - how good can it be !
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Events
  • Leaderboard
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Community Hub to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: michaelkellett
  • Date Created: 9 Apr 2022 3:19 PM Date Created
  • Views 5709 views
  • Likes 13 likes
  • Comments 17 comments
  • audio
  • analogue design
  • analog
  • analog_circuits
Related
Recommended

A 1970 Power Amplifier - how good can it be !

michaelkellett
michaelkellett
9 Apr 2022
A 1970 Power Amplifier - how good can it be !

This blog was sparked off (in part) by airbornesurfer’s January blog about renovating his Califone 1430k school record player,

/challenges-projects/element14-presents/b/blog/posts/project-califone-renovating-and-rewiring-a-califone-1430k-portable-phonograph

I suggested that rather than use a nasty modern switching amplifier he should build a nice period-correct transistor amplifier.

This got me thinking ……..

The first successful (it worked, I got paid) commercial electronic project I ever did was in about 1971 when I built a 25W Mullard designed power amplifier. It was to be used as a guitar practice amplifier.

Mullard was one of the early electronics companies, and as was common in the 60s and 70s published a good range of designs to promote the parts they made. In 1969 they published a small hardback book “Transistor Audio and Radio Circuits.”. It contains many gems and one of them is the 25W Audio Amplifier.

The design was typical of the period and unlike later designs substituted capacitors for transistors. The staggeringly successful Quad 303 power amplifier used a similar (but more sophisticated and better performing design.)

For a good description of a contemporary and much lest cost inhibited design look up “Barney Oliver Amplifier” – this was an HP home time project from 1973.

Most of the semiconductors in the original Mullard design are obsolete – so my re-working of it uses parts that are current and available.

The book is available as a pdf on the web.

My revised design:

image

I’m going to keep this blog reasonably brief so I won’t describe in detail how it works (and the Mullard book doesn’t either) – but later I mean to see how much better we can do – and that will mean getting into the guts of the design to see if we can improve it, and how a more modern design gets round some of the problems.

I missed out on the recent E14 prototyping project so I’m using this amp as an example of how I go about building and testing prototypes.

First of all you need the design – in this case it came from a book. Then we need to develop it to use the bits we can get. Then we design a board.

To design the board we have to start thinking about power and voltage ratings of components and I tripped up on this board with R9. The original design mislead me – it suggests that R10 should be rated at 500mW but makes no suggestion for R9. I did a quick calculation in my head - the steady state (DC) current though Q2 is about 5.7mA so the DC power in R9 is 15mW – so the 0603 resistor I used is fine. But there is a problem – C5 couples the output to the junction of R9 and R10 and we expect about 15V RMS on the output. At operating frequencies C5 impedance is negligible so at full output there is 15V RMS across R9, and that will make 479mW – too much for 0603. Although I’m not describing the circuit in detail – it’s worth mentioning that this trick of “bootstrapping” the drive to the output stage of power amplifiers was common at the time. More modern designs use extra semiconductors and replace R9 and R10 with a current source.

The other thing that went a bit wrong was the phono socket I used for the input – the drawing for this part isn’t very good and for it to work the centre pin needs an impossible slot in the pcb (4mm long and 0.5mm wide) – I had a round hole so the Dremmel came into play to improve the connector.

I buy my boards from PCBCART in China – reasonable prices and quick delivery. I go for gold plating because these prototype parts sometimes lie around for years and then find a new use. Immersion silver and solder levelled boards are usually too corroded to be readily soldered after a few months.

There has been some talk about powering up boards and I’ve managed to practice what I preach and get a reasonable number of test points on this one.

TP10 and TP3 will allow me to neatly fix the R9 problem by connecting a through hole part between them.

I rather like the 3W surface mount 0.47R resistors I found for this – they were on a cheapo at Farnell.

Boards after solder paste stencilling.

image

4 Boards ready on the hand operated pick and place

image

Ready to reflow

image

And with all the TH bits

image

Finally, with power transistors and a heatsink – (there are insulators under the power devices)

image

Powering Up

I used a TTi QL564 linear regulated power supply.

I started up at 12V and 100mA – no problems. It starts to work when the supply gets over about 20V.

No nasty currents and no smell. The two pots worked OK. Supply up to 50V – current still nice and low (<10mA with VR2 set for minimum). I adjusted VR2 for about 40mA Iq and VR1 for 25V at TP5.

Then I ran it into a 47R load – using the HP8903A to look at output and to provide drive signals.

It was OK but the distortion was very high and the frequency response a bit odd.

Oh poo !

I had forgotten to fit R21 !

Everything much more sensible then.

I did most of the initial testing with the QL564 power supply but switched over to a TTi MX180TP for the 4.7R load tests.

Testing

Amplifier and Load

image

Test Setup

image

Capacitive Load Stability test

image

Gain 82.27 (expected 70.7 from Mullard book – I haven’t looked into the difference)

Input for full power into 8R load, 164mV

THD, 25W into 8R load, 50V supply HP8903B used for measurments:

50Hz 0.05%

1kHZ 0.08%

10kHz 0.69%

THD, 35W into 4R7 load, 50V supply HP8903B used for measurments:

1kHz 0.06%

THD at lower power 1kHz, 8R load

23mW 0.11%

93mW 0.07%

Wideband noise, measured with HP8903B output set to zero

0.4mV (signal to noise ratio full power to noise) = 91dB

Frequency Response, half power 8R load, ref 1kHz

20Hz -0.4dB

50Hz -0.02dB

10kHz -0.74dB

20kHz -2.24dB

30kHz -4.03dB

Stability, square wave drive 1kHz into 8R//2uF Kenwood AG-204D signal generator

image

Summary

The updated Mullard amp performs pretty much as the spec indicates. Its not up to modern HiFi standards but bearing in mind that the design is 50 years old that isn’t a surprise.

Hope this is useful to someone.

The next steps in this project for me are to finish developing the automated test system based on the HP8903A/B audio analysers.

I’ll also see if any simple tweaks can improve the amplifier.

If anyone fancies making their own I can supply Gerber files (or possibly even a board or two.)

MK

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 3 years ago +1
    Really interesting blog Michael. Can I ask about your approach to mounting on the heat sink: when it comes to enclosing it, assuming you do or for the purposes of the question you do, how would you go…
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 3 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps +1
    But I can understand your point about the 'readability' of the schematic. If you are more used to later designs, where a complementary pair (NPN/PNP) of output power devices would often be used, then a…
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 3 years ago in reply to michaelkellett +1
    A DC load with 4 MOSFETS, a sense resistor and temperature IC mounted on a heat sink. I have a 100mmx75mmx40mm heat sink that should be sufficient (with a fan) and a 120mmx100mmx80mm case. I wanted to…
Parents
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 3 years ago

    Nice!
    Nitpick alert on the schematics: You draw the output transistors as a connector. For a reviewer, it's not immediately clear what kind of transistors they are. My OCD kicks in then ;)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 3 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps

    The schematic says what they are. TIP3055.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 3 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps

    The schematic says what they are. TIP3055.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube