element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      • Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Personal Blogs
  • Community Hub
  • More
Personal Blogs
Legacy Personal Blogs YAPS Part Eleven - Further Testing
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: Andrew J
  • Date Created: 18 Jul 2019 8:37 PM Date Created
  • Views 3761 views
  • Likes 8 likes
  • Comments 32 comments
  • bench_power_supply
  • bench power supply
Related
Recommended

YAPS Part Eleven - Further Testing

Andrew J
Andrew J
18 Jul 2019

EDITS: 21/07/19 - added a PDF of the schematic

            11/08/19 - updated navigation links

 

Introduction

My intention was to document, in some detail, testing of the power supply with both a 10 Ohm and 5 Ohm load (to drive the current from 0A to 3A.)  To summarise, I’m seeing a number of problems - see later - and I thought I’d document where I’ve got to as I need to do some thinking about this.  See my conclusion at the end.  TL;DR; It isn't working as well as I hoped!

 

I’ve broken the testing down as measured testing and Noise and Ripple testing.  If you can see problems with how I’ve done this testing, or ways of improving it, or indeed other tests you’d like to see, please let me know so I can improve or report additional results.

 

For the measured testing, I’ve captured data for the following tests:

  • Voltage and current comparison test
  • Steady state operation/voltage stability
  • Rise Time
  • Overshoot/Undershoot when turning on the mains switch; turning off/on load switch; lowering voltage level down to 0V; raising voltage level up to 15V
  • Soak test over 1 hour to measure temperatures and voltage stability

 

My scope was warmed up for 30 minutes before taking any measurements.

 

Environment and Setup

By necessity, the following equipment is turned on and plugged in to the same power strip as the scope and power supply: FTTP Modem, Router.  Also operating, but plugged in to a different power strip: iMac, AOC monitor, USB hard drive.

 

The probe was used with a short ground connector

image

 

Images on other blog posts show the setup and layout of the prototype board.

 

10 Ohm Load

The load is a 10.08 Ohm, 100W resistor, connected through its solder lugs (although not soldered.)  For all these tests, using the scope, the probe was set at 10x, full bandwidth, and a timebase that allowed for 1GSa/s where possible, measuring DC, and connected across the control stage output terminals.

 

Voltage and Current measurement

Essentially, this is a comparison test of DMM measurement vs INA260 vs 4Duino.  I took readings at various voltage settings, reported in the table below.

  • DMM voltage was measured at the Control Stage output terminal
  • DMM current was measured in series between Control Stage output and load
  • INA260 voltage was measured at Vin to the chip
  • INA260 current was calculated using ohms law from the measured voltage at INA260 Vin.
  • 4Duino voltage and current as reported on the screen
  • 10.08 Ohm load

 

image

The Extech, measuring current, has a resolution to 2DP (i.e. 10mV).  These results seem pretty good to me, particularly current.

 

The table following shows measurements with NO load attached (voltage only of course:

image

Again, very good.

 

Steady State Measurement

These images were captured off the scope

15V - 3.02V / division

image

10V - 2V / division

image

5V - 1V / division

image

0.5V - 100mV / division

image

As you can see voltage is steady but the noise is more apparent with the scope set in the 100mV division range.  More on noise in later tests.

 

Rise Time

3.02V/div.  Normal trigger set at 181mV.  Timebase at 5mS.

image

LTSpice simulation rise time:

image

The actual rise time to the set voltage is 12.7ms actual vs 2.1ms simulated.  There are similarities in the waveform but it's not clear why the rise time is so slow - my suspicion falls on the MOSFET, see Conclusions.

 

Overshoot

The scope timebase was set at 100uS and sample rate at 1GSa/s.

Voltage control on the supply was set so 4duino was reporting 15v;  Trigger set to 15.46V, rising edge, normal mode.

 

Mains Switch test: mains turned off then back on.  No triggering occurred.  Trigger set to 15.4V and test repeated.  Waveform displayed - noise is triggering the waveform.

Load Switch test: mains is on, load switch turned off then back on.  No triggering occurred.  Trigger set to 15.4V and test repeated.  Waveform displayed - noise is triggering the waveform.

Rising Voltage test: voltage control turned to 0V and waveform confirmed on the scope.  Trigger set back to 15.46V, normal.  Voltage control rapidly turned to increase volts.  No waveform triggered before measured volts reached 15V.  No overshoot observed.  Reset voltage control back to 0V and trigger to 15.4V and repeated.  Waveform was displayed at a reported 15V (4Duino).  Again, noise is triggering the waveform.

 

There doesn't appear to be any actual overshoot occurring - no high spiking - but noise is making it difficult to accurately assess if there’s a low-mV overshoot.

 

Undershoot

The scope timebase was set at 100uS and sample rate at 1GSa/s.

Voltage control set so scope was seeing 15V.  Trigger set to -0.6V, falling edge, normal mode.

Mains Switch test: with voltage control set at 15V the mains switch was turned off.  Waveform displayed.

Load Switch test: with voltage control set at 15V and mains switch turned on, the load switch was turned off.  Waveform displayed

Lowering Voltage test: Voltage control rapidly turned from 15v to decrease volts.  No waveform triggered until around 0.24V - again, this seems to be the result of noise (and is in line with the triggering on the overshoot.)

 

I’m not convinced I’m measuring these undershoot tests correctly, when operating the switches, as whatever position I set the trigger to (e.g. -60mV, -340mV) a waveform is displayed at that value when the switch is activated, but there is no spiking, just a steady voltage line.  Lack of experience with scopes I think, but thoughts would be appreciated?

 

Soak Test

This didn’t involve the scope, just readings from the 4Duino - I'm particularly interested in reported temperatures.  Power supply was left off to cool to ambient and then turned on for 1 hour at 15.5V and measurements recorded.  At the end of the hour, I used a thermocouple on a multimeter to cross-check recorded temperatures and sample other components on the Control Stage PCB.  Other components’ are the Schottky Rectifiers, 5V regulator and LT3092 current control.

 

image

Other components measuring between 40c and 45c.

These results seem pretty reasonable to me - no components seemed to overheat anywhere near their limits.  Voltage had drifted down by 50mV from its initial peak setting - I’m wondering if that is due to the heating of the load resistor which is quite warm given it’s dissipating over 23W of power.

 

5 Ohm Load

The load is actually 5.08 Ohm, 100W resistor connected through solder lugs (although not soldered).   I had intended to undertake the same testing as for the 10 Ohm load but the supply will only provide for 8.5V / 1.6A (approx) rising slowly over 6 minutes to 8.87V / 1.7A, and still rising.  Something clearly isn’t right so there doesn't seem much point until I investigate further.  I tested with a 1000 Ohm resistor (I only have 0.25W unfortunately) and that was ok.  I don’t have another power resistor to try with.  Not only that, I have noticed that touching the -ve line from the current control potentiometer drops about 2V on the output - see the video

You don't have permission to edit metadata of this video.
Edit media
x
image
Upload Preview
image

 

No other leads do this and I have tested continuity (power off) and it’s solid.  I’ve even replaced the connector.   If I connect the 10 Ohm load and try this experiment, it has no affect; ditto no affect if no load is attached.

As a thought, I’m wondering if the bad output is the result of current limiting from the circuit? I can drop it down from whatever the current reading is to 0A with the potentiometer.  Could the 5 Ohm resistor be faulty?  It’s a 1% resistor measuring 5.08 Ohms so is slightly out of spec but I put this down to the DMM?

 

Noise and Ripple Testing

Noise and ripple are poor which I need to sort out.  For the sake of documenting the testing, I’ve included images below to show what I mean.

Baseline

I took some measurements with the power supply off to get a baseline level.  Same timebase and voltage division; bandwidth limited; 1x probe, AC coupled.

 

Background noise, no probe connected to the scope, power supply off:

image

Background noise, probe held, power supply off:

image

Background noise, probe on ESD mat (connected to ground), power supply off:

image

Background noise, probe held away from power supply, power supply on:

image

Background noise, probe held by power supply, power supply on (good heavens!):

image

Supply Measurements

Supply on at 15v.  Timebase and/or voltage division selected to show noise; bandwidth limited; 1x probe, AC coupled.

 

10 Ohm Load attached, powered through RCD (1st image), no RCD (2nd Image):

imageimage

No load attached, powered through RCD (1st image), no RCD (2nd Image):

imageimage

And here's a couple with the timebase changed, both without RCD.  With load (1st image) and no load (2nd image):

imageimage

 

I think it's fair to say these are NOT good results and I need to do something about it.  Again, I suspect the MOSFET.

 

Current Position

As I noted at the start, I decided to document the testing progress so far as there are clearly issues and I guess part of this whole project was to document how it came together, good and bad!  The 5 Ohm load results I’m not sure what to make of or how to proceed - it clearly doesn’t like such a low resistive load but I don’t have any other way I can think of of testing it.  I can’t understand what is up with the current control connection either - why would touching it with such a low load affect the voltage?

 

I’m wondering if the Mosfet is causing some of the issues.  In this thread, Jon Clift points out it may well cause problems and it is definitely out of conformance to the requirement of the LTC1624 which requires a maximum 2000pF of input capacitance on the connected Mosfet (the one I have is 3247pF so way over.)  I’ve hunted down another one, IRL8721PBF, but it’s not easy!  There are 10s of thousands of the things and the parameteric search on Farnell/CPC is hopeless for purpose.  I’m also not sure what the important specs to look for are but I have read around and here’s a comparison of what I think the important ones are:

image

The rise/fall/delay times seem to be heavily dependent upon the specific circuit they were tested with but I quote them for comparison purposes.  The Total Gate Charge seems to be a better indicator of switching time and the IRL is significantly better.  The input capacitance is well within requirements as well.

 

My approach now is to:

  • replace the MOSFET with the IRLB8721.
  • replace the power switch with an filtered module as per Michael Kellett’s suggestion in this thread.
  • bodge in a 0.4mH Common Mode Choke between the Power stage output and Control Stage input.
  • test voltages at various points of the circuit to compare with what the LTSpice simulation is reporting.  It may give me a clue as to where issues lie - perhaps I’ve mis-soldered a resistor or capacitor (shame these can’t be tested in-circuit.)

 

Why a filtered power module and Choke?  The frequency I was seeing the noise at seems to range from 60kHz to 130kHz and the datasheet indicates this would attenuate; I’m wondering if some noise is coming in through the power lead; I’m also wondering if this thing switching is potentially introducing noise on other equipment which I need to deal with.  I may have grasped the wrong end of the stick here completely though

 

If anyone has any other suggestions then I’m really open to hearing about them.  I’ve come a long way and I feel so close - It’s a bit disheartening if I’m honest: it all seemed to be going so well!

 

Follow on results I’ll post as a comment.

 

Next: Part Twelve - Design revisited: reworking the layout and PCB

Back: Part Ten - The Control Stage and Initial Functional Testing

Attachments:
imageSchematic.pdf
  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • three-phase
    three-phase over 6 years ago +4
    Some interesting test results you have shared with us. Some of my thoughts..... Did you measure what the voltage was at the rectifier with the 5Ohm resistor attached, are you dropping volts there that…
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 6 years ago in reply to genebren +4
    Thanks for the encouragement, I’m not giving up yet - too many ideas for improvements that I want to make in v2! The MOSFET I’ve used is definitely suspect and I’m looking at ways of providing a direct…
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 6 years ago +4
    Hello Andrew, Having now looked at your schematic and their design article [I'm doing this all backwards!], here are a few quick observations. In the context of their circuit (I found your schematic confusing…
Parents
  • three-phase
    three-phase over 6 years ago

    Some interesting test results you have shared with us. Some of my thoughts.....

     

    Did you measure what the voltage was at the rectifier with the 5Ohm resistor attached, are you dropping volts there that are limiting the output? Unless you measured the 5Ohms with a 4 wire test setup, I wouldn't worry too much about the value you got.

     

    When measuring over / undershoot, I usually set the scope trigger to single shot with a fast timebase, so it only captures the initial event.

     

    When measuring the noise, was the bandwidth scope limited? Usual practice is to limit it to 20MHz. Your setup is also very open, with fairly long leads that will pickup all kinds of noise from all directions.

     

    I am sure others will come along with some much better observations than I have made. Good luck with your fault finding and thanks for sharing.

     

    Kind regards.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • three-phase
    three-phase over 6 years ago

    Some interesting test results you have shared with us. Some of my thoughts.....

     

    Did you measure what the voltage was at the rectifier with the 5Ohm resistor attached, are you dropping volts there that are limiting the output? Unless you measured the 5Ohms with a 4 wire test setup, I wouldn't worry too much about the value you got.

     

    When measuring over / undershoot, I usually set the scope trigger to single shot with a fast timebase, so it only captures the initial event.

     

    When measuring the noise, was the bandwidth scope limited? Usual practice is to limit it to 20MHz. Your setup is also very open, with fairly long leads that will pickup all kinds of noise from all directions.

     

    I am sure others will come along with some much better observations than I have made. Good luck with your fault finding and thanks for sharing.

     

    Kind regards.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 6 years ago in reply to three-phase

    I had the scope set to bandwidth limited - 20mHz - with the probe set at x1, Ac coupled.  I was expecting some noise from the flying leads but not that much.  It Looks like switching noise to me but I don’t have a comparison to fall back on.

     

    i did try single shot on the over-/under-shoot measurements but I think I will revisit it more carefully.  I think I was doing it incorrectly.  I’ll also take some voltage measurements at the rectifier as you suggest, with no load, 10ohm and 5ohm and see if there’s differences.

     

    thanks for your input Donald.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube