element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Personal Blogs
  • Community Hub
  • More
Personal Blogs
Frank Milburn's Blog Quick Review: Multicomp Pro Handheld LCR Meter
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: fmilburn
  • Date Created: 20 Jan 2021 6:14 AM Date Created
  • Views 13276 views
  • Likes 10 likes
  • Comments 50 comments
  • resistance
  • lcr
  • inductance
  • mp780402
  • multicomp pro
  • review
  • hantek to11 1832c
  • lcr meter
  • capacitance
Related
Recommended

Quick Review: Multicomp Pro Handheld LCR Meter

fmilburn
fmilburn
20 Jan 2021

I am posting my initial impressions of the Multicomp Pro Handheld LCR MeterMulticomp Pro Handheld LCR Meter.  My objectives are to get familiar with the capabilities and use of the meter, do some comparisons to other instruments in my possession, and summarize my impressions in a way that might prove useful for other electronics enthusiasts.

image

Background

 

I am constantly trying to upgrade my bench and this is the first really capable LCR meter I have owned.  It was definitely a want as opposed to a need but after winning a Project14 contest a while back I was able to obtain it.  My interests lie in the relatively complex way that passive components can behave and how they differ from ideal behavior.  Among the areas I have investigated out of curiosity are the measurement of resistance in the milliohm region, capacitor ESR, and capacitor variance with frequency. 

 

Two other LCR meters with similar capability often seen are the Der EE DE-5000 and various versions of BK Precision handheld LCR Meters - e.g. the top of the line 880.  These sell for approximately $100 and $330 respectively with lower cost versions of the BK Precision meter available.  I looked at their specifications and read reviews before ordering my Multicomp Pro LCR meter to get an idea of what else is on the market.  Multicomp Pro is a relatively new brand for Farnell / Newark and I only recently came upon this meter.  The current price at Newark is $195.

 

I wanted a meter with high resolution, good accuracy, multiple test frequencies, 4-wire measurement capability, auto ranging, wide measurement range, and all the measurement parameters you can get on an LCR meter.  I want it all!

 

Specifications

 

image

Credit: specifications from Farnell website: 2899698.pdf (farnell.com)

 

First Impressions

 

The LCR meter came nicely boxed and undamaged.  The meter has a nice zip up case that contains 2-wire test leads, a short circuit shunt, Type-C USB cable, and power adapter.

image

This is a large meter.  I was surprised at how large.  Very large image  It feels sturdy and substantial.  It takes it a short while to boot up and then there is a rather faint beep.

 

Before going further note that this is a rebranded Hantek 1833C.  I was able to determine this by querying *IDN? with SCPI.

 

Front

 

The display is a 2.8 inch TFT LCD that looks nice with white lettering on a dark background.  The primary and secondary functions are easy to read although the viewing angle is not as good nor is it as legible as some of my other meters. Still acceptable though.  The backlighting is adjustable and good.  The display also shows other parameters in a smaller font that is still legible provided one is no further away than they might be while reading a book.  It is hard to photograph and the actual display is of even contrast and looks nicer than my attempt to capture it below.

image

There are lots of buttons and a keypad.  The buttons are squishy, not clicky.  Rather than go through them in great detail, here is a link to the user manual: 3154931.pdf (farnell.com).  A greatly abbreviated overview is given below.

image

The top row of buttons allows the user to go straight to commonly used display modes and to hold the current reading.  As an example of mode, the R-X button will display resistance as the primary parameter and impedance as the secondary parameter.

 

The second row of buttons allows setting of:

  • frequency from 100 Hz up to 100 kHz
  • manual measurement range
  • RMS voltage level of 300 or 600 mV
  • fast (4 Hz), medium (2 Hz), and slow (1 Hz) measurement speeds

 

The upper white button to the left of the arrow keys allow the primary parameter to be automatically or manually set (resistance, capacitance, inductance, and impedance).  The white key below it sets the secondary parameter (reactance, dissipation factor, quality factor, phase angle, and equivalent series resistance).  To the right of the arrow keys the black button allows measurement to be in either series or parallel equivalent modes.  The set key allows language, display brightness, boot state, and the beeper to be set as well as displaying device information.

 

The arrow / cursor keys allow navigation through the row of parameters shown at the bottom of the display.  These can be used to achieve the same results as using the buttons.

 

Just below the arrow keys are the power switch, record button (records min, average, and max when in a manual mode for the last 10 tests), and the REL and COMPARE keys which are used to calibrate the instrument.  The COMPARE key can also be used to compare components to expected nominal values within a user selected range of "good".

 

Hurray!  This meter has real 4-wire / Kelvin capability plus guard in addition to the standard jacks.

image

Credit: User Manual 3154931.pdf (farnell.com)

 

I found that when inserting small capacitors into the Kelvin slot it was possible to insert one leg incorrectly and get a bad reading.  In that case it might be best to use the alligator clips that come with it although they aren't 4-wire. I'd like to fit some Kelvin probes to the meter but Newark does not list them.  I intend to make my own.

 

Right Side

 

There is a flip open rubber cover that exposes the USB C.  The USB C plug is atypically long and a standard plug won't reach all of the way.  Don't lose that USB C cable!  USB C is used to both recharge the battery and communicate over serial with a computer.  The batteries are 18650 so they could be replaced in future.  There is also a snap out plastic cover for something that isn't installed. 

 

Back

 

There isn't that much to see here.  I like the angle that the tilting stand gives.  When tilted up the meter has to be held with one hand while buttons are pushed, else it will slide.  There isn't an obvious way to get inside but I'll come back to why I didn't bother in a minute.

 

image

 

Top, Bottom, and Left Sides

 

There is an indentation and it is clear the enclosure is being used for multiple different instruments.  It turns out that a hand held oscilloscope also uses this case and the indents are for BNC connection.  The bottom and left side are unadorned.

 

Manual

 

No paper was provided and it is accessed online or can be downloaded in PDF form.  It seems comprehensive.

 

Section 2.7 labeled Firmware Update of the manual seemed poorly done and I chose to ignore it.  It instructs the user to download the tool "DfuSe Demo v3.0.5" and install it without giving a link. When I did a search it turns out this is a ST USB upgrade extension.  I couldn't readily see the version listed in the manual on the ST site and the ST manual was too much to bother with that late at night.  Windows 10 eventually installed the device after churning around a bit so I haven't revisited this.

 

In addition to a reasonably good description on how to use the instrument there is a complete set of tables giving accuracy for parameters at various ranges and measurement frequencies.  For example, here are capacitance and dissipation for frequencies 100 to 400 Hz and all ranges along with the recommended equivalent mode.

image

Credit:  User Manual

 

Similar tables are available for other parameters, frequencies, and ranges and another example for impedance is shown below.  The bottom end of the impedance range at 100 Hz is 0.4 ohms, shows 4 digits, and is accurate to 4% + 3 digits.  That is pretty impressive but see my comments on measuring resistors.

image

One thing I like about the BK Precision 880 is that it can automatically select the recommended equivalent series or parallel mode, a feature not available on the Multicomp Pro which is the kind of thing I am apt to forget to do.  A feature not present on this instrument but available on the others is a DC setting for resistance.  I don't consider that much of an issue for my use.

 

The manual also gives an account of communication using SCPI and has a complete command reference. 

 

Time to Try It Out!

 

This not a comprehensive review and the capabilities of this LCR exceed anything else I have with the exception of pure resistance so I'm just going to learn to use it and compare it where I can to other instruments in my collection.

image

The bench multimeter on the left is a Tenma 72-1020Tenma 72-1020 and will be used for resistance and capacitance checking.  The homemade instrument just to the right of it that is open (I'm about to build a new one) is a Milliohm Meter designed here on element14, the Multicomp Pro Handheld LCR MeterMulticomp Pro Handheld LCR Meter is to the right of it, and below that the purple instrument is a Peak ESR70Peak ESR70 capacitance and ESR meter.  The yellowish orange device center bottom is one of the inexpensive multifunction transistor testers that can be bought off eBay or on Chinese sites.

 

Calibration

 

Calibration of the Multicomp Pro takes a few minutes to compete and is done in both open and closed modes.  The meter cycles through all frequencies and ranges.  It must be done in manual mode.

 

SCPI

 

Communication is over USB-C and the meter shows up on my Windows 10 machine as a USB Serial Device but initially gave an error.  When the error checker was ran it did something and came back asking me to restart my machine.  I did and started up Putty.  The manual doesn't give the Baud rate.  9600 doesn't work but  2400 Baud seems to so I'm in.  When the command *IDN? is issued the following is returned:

 

Hantek 1833C Handheld LCR Meter,20200602AM,CN2029021000865,1

 

Interesting.  It is a rebranded Hantek instrument.  When I did an internet search it turns out the Hantek version is selling for $181 on eBay shipping from China.  There is also a review by VoltLog and he does a teardown so I don't have to: Hantek TO11 1832C LCR Meter Review & Teardown | Voltlog #303 – VoltLog

 

VoltLog's teardown reveals that the instrument uses 18650 batteries that could be replaced in future which is nice.

 

All the SCPI commands I tried worked fine.

 

Range of Capacitors

 

Below a number of capacitors are evaluated to see if the Multicomp Pro will work over the full range.  Readings at 100 Hz.

 

 

 

CapacitorCapacitanceDissipation FactorSeries / Parallel
10 pF ceramic10 pF0.01Parallel
100 pF ceramic101 pF0.004Parallel
1 nF ceramic1.018 nF0.0043Parallel
10 nF ceramic10.0010.0164Parallel
100 nF ceramic99.220.0135Parallel
1 uF ceramic1.14920.0227Parallel
10 uF electrolytic9.5950.06515Series
100 uF electrolytic97.300.1633Series
1000 uF electrolytic966.20.1580Series
10,000 uF electrolytic9,0770.2493Series

 

No problems noted, it seems quick to test.

 

Capacitor Matching Exercise

 

I selected five 100 nF MLCC capacitors rated 50V with 20% tolerance manufactured by AVX.  All were from the same lot.  The first one measured 96.84 nF on the Multicomp Pro and averaged around 96.5 on my Tenma 72-1020 multimeter.  That is pretty close. The Tenma wanders around a lot though and doesn't settle down. The Multicomp Pro is much more stable and quicker.

 

When I check for repeatability by removing and replacing the same capacitor there was very little variance.  Here are 5 readings of the same capacitor:  96.84, 96.85, 96.80, 96.80, 96.80.  It did drift a bit more when I left it there for a few minute but really no problems.

 

I set the meter to measure relative differences to see how close my selected five capacitors were to each other.  The readings in no particular order were:

 

Capacitor #Capacitance, nFError from 1st Capacitor
196.660.00%
295.85-0.99%
396.900.07%
498.201.40%
595.12-1.75%

 

 

All of these little guys were within 5% of their nominal values and varied less than 2% from each other.  All good.

 

Capacitance Parameters as a Function of Frequency

 

I'll investigate a L.H. Nova 10 uF 50V electrolytic capacitor in detail, chosen because the datasheet only lists accuracy for 100 kHz frequency for capacitors up to this size.  The instrument was calibrated before starting the test and the 4-wire connections used. The measurements were made in series equivalent mode.

 

 

Parameter100 Hz120 Hz400 Hz1 kHz4 kHz10 kHz40 kHz50 kHz75 kHz100 kHz
Capacitance, uF9.609.559.068.618.127.596.115.835.224.56
ESR, Ohms8.378.405.493.852.952.772.602.412.472.51
X, Ohms-166-139-43.9-18.5-4.90-2.10-0.650-0.535-0.406-0.350
D0.05630.06410.1270.2080.6031.334.014.596.077.20
Q17.715.57.894.801.650.7550.2490.2180.1640.139
Theta, degrees-86.7-86.3-82.8-78.2-58.8-37.1-14.1-12.2-9.32-7.88

 

I choose to report only 3 significant figures here although more are available.  ESR climbs as the capacitor is left in place for low frequency.  The display jumped around a bit on some readings.

 

ESR Comparison for 10,000 uF Electrolytic

 

I have a Peak ESR70 meter for measuring capacitance and an inexpensive "M-Tester" and will make a quick comparison to the Multicomp Pro using a Nichicon 10,000 uF 16V electrolytic capacitor.  I also include my bench multimeter for capacitance. Three readings are made with each instrument.  The Multicomp Pro is set to 100 Hz and series equivalent.

 

 

InstrumentCapacitance, uFESR, Ohms
Multicomp Pro

9171

9169

9053

0.042

0.043

0.041

Peak ESR70

9706

9639

9574

0.01

0.02

0.02

M-Tester

9922

9889

9889

0.16

0.15

0.14

Tenma 72-1020

9507

9453

9449

 

On the 20 mF range the Multicomp Pro specification show capacitance accuracy to be 8.00%+5 digits and all but the M-Tester are within 8% of the Multicomp Pro.  The accuracy of the ESR measurement is not given for the Multicomp Pro but from my tests in my Deep Dive into ESR blog I know that the ESR70 cannot make accurate measurements at 0.04 Ohms and we are down in that region.  The M-Tester does not make accurate ESR measurements in this region.

 

Low ESR

 

Low ESR sounds like some kind of medical affliction but here I am referring to a low Equivalent Series Resistance capacitor, the Panasonic 74AC7107 conductive polymer aluminum electrolytic capacitor rated 220 uF +/- 20%, 6.3V, and from the datasheet a max ESR of 0.009 Ohms at 100 kHz.  Dissipation factor is stated to be ≦ 0.06 (120 Hz / + 20 ℃).  I am unable to measure the ESR on this capacitor with any of my other instruments.  Measurement was in series equivalent mode.

 

Parameter100 Hz120 Hz400 Hz1 kHz4 kHz10 kHz40 kHz50 kHz75 kHz100 kHz
Capacitance, uF205.9205.5203.1201.1206.9
ESR, Ohms0.06640.05480.02360.01470.00910.00870.00400.00460.00650.0074
D0.00840.00850.01180.01840.04810.115Wonky

 

I was unable to get measurements in the empty cells due where the Multicomp Pro does not report a value.  The specifications in the User Manual report capacitance accuracy up to 4 kHz only.  While the meter does report ESR up to 100 kHz and the value is in line with the capacitor datasheet I don't really trust it.  ESR accuracy is not given in the User Manual.

 

Inductance

 

There isn't much at hand to test for inductance but here is a 330 uH inductor that I pulled off of something.  The meter is in parallel equivalent mode.

 

 

Parameter100 Hz120 Hz400 Hz1 kHz4 kHz10 kHz40 kHz50 kHz75 kHz100 kHz
Inductance, uH15601190435366352346339338336336
Q0.5390.6410.8965.3217.629.037.339.742.941.0
Theta, degrees28.332.765.079.486.788.088.588.688.788.6
X, Ohms0.2210.6230.8972.228.8421.785.2106158210.9

 

 

Interesting behavior.

 

Resistance and Impedance

 

Here I test a number of resistors and wires with the Multicomp Pro and my DIY Milliohm Meter and Tenma 72-1020 bench multimeter.  The Multicomp Pro does not have a DC setting and it was set as follows:

  • Manual
  • 100 Hz freq
  • 10 Ohm Range for low resistance, auto for high
  • Level 300 mV
  • Speed slow
  • Series equivalent

 

The Multicomp Pro and Milliohm Meter use Using 4-wire measurement.

 

 

Nominal Value Tested, OhmsMulticomp Pro, Z OhmsMilliohm Meter, R OhmsTenma 72-1020, R Ohms
10,000,00010,049,00010,116,000
1,000,000996,000994,300
100,00099,68099,450
10,0009,9829,959
1,000980977
100100.0100.2
1010.1710.15
1 Ohm, Dale 0.5%0.99991.0035
0.100 0.5%0.09950.1001
0.98 m 26 AWG wire0.08830.0907
0.49 m 26 AWG wire0.04230.0456
0.245 m 26 AWG wire0.02050.0232
3.5 cm 26 AWG wire0.00690.0038

 

The readings, except for those at very low resistances are very close to the comparison instruments.  For very low readings I believe my milliohm meter is more accurate.  I have tested it extensively and also have some wire that Shabaz gave me that was measured on a meter with certificates.  In addition, if the resistance per unit length calculated at 0.98 m and then at 0.245 m we see that the Multicomp Pro is not quite linear whereas the Milliohm Meter is.  I also noted that Multicomp Pro started giving spurious readings when resistance was below 1 ohm in auto mode.  At least I think that is what was causing it - it cleared up later when I went into manual mode.  The Multicomp Pro also did not give as steady a reading as the other two meters at some settings and I used the "record" setting to get averages in the table above.  In all cases however, the Multicomp Pro would appear to be within the specifications in the User's Manual.

 

Summary

 

As best I can determine so far the Multicomp Pro meets the specifications given in the User's Manual. The specifications are comparable to the other meters in the same class and it offers all the functions expected including a number of testing frequencies from 100 Hz to 100 kHz (but not DC like on some meters).  The capacitance measurements are quick and can be done series or parallel equivalent.  I did limited testing of inductance but saw no issues.  When measuring resistance I did find it gave spurious results in Auto mode when measuring below 1 Ohm so some care should be taken to switch to manual where it meets specifications.  It does not come with Kelvin probes so I intend to make my own.  The USB plug is unusually long and the other USB cables I have will not work with it.

 

I strongly prefer this meter for measuring capacitance over the other instruments I have.

 

I have measured inductance with my oscilloscope but this is of course much quicker. 

 

I prefer my bench multimeter for high value resistor measurements and my DIY Milliohm Meter for low values.  They are quick, at least as accurate, and don't show as much variation during measurement.  The Multicomp Pro seems to jump around even when in the mode where it averages the last 10 measurements which is distracting.  The Multicomp Pro does have the desirable feature of measuring the full range in one meter however.

 

I haven't seen many posts on LCR meters on Element14 so comment below if you have experience.  As always your comments, suggestions, and corrections are welcome.

 

4-Wire Kelvin Adapter

 

image

 

Edit 05 Feb 2021:  A DIY 4-Wire Kelvin adapter for the LCR can be found in this post.

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • fmilburn
    fmilburn over 4 years ago in reply to Andrew J +5
    Thanks Andrew, The connections use opposing spring like terminals that press against the leads of the DUT being inserted into them without touching each other. Notice that the middle terminal may not quite…
  • fmilburn
    fmilburn over 4 years ago in reply to shabaz +5
    Here is the modified design:
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 4 years ago +4
    Hi Frank, Very nice review, and this price for an instrument that covers these frequencies is really good I think! It's definitely a world apart from the low-cost LCR test tools that cannot control the…
Parents
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 4 years ago

    Hi Frank,

     

    Very nice review, and this price for an instrument that covers these frequencies is really good I think! It's definitely a world apart from the low-cost LCR test tools that cannot control the frequency.

    Also it's great to see the detailed display and it looks very usable with the range of buttons.

     

    Incidentally, there's another method that might suit your needs for the kelvin measurements.  If you had a PCB designed that would fit into the slots, then you could have solder points where you can temporarily solder the device-under-test (and then desolder it and use it). The benefit of that over the clamps/clips etc is that nothing moves, so measurements will be as steady (and hopefully as accurate) as possible. Then you could have another PCB with no component, just a short soldered across, and that becomes your short calibrator. You'd also use another PCB for the open calibration. You could even get the contacts gold plated, perhaps that's guilding the lily though : )

    Anyway, it's an option that I think is worth it with LCR measurements.

     

    I do a similar thing with a vector network analyzer (VNA). This was the PCB I used (It says Texas Instruments on it because I copied chunks of it from their design), and in this case I have to use connectors since the VNA does not have slots. But you can see the idea. In the photo below the component under test is the tantalum capacitor, soldered to the DUT section of the board.

    If you had (say) five boards made up, then two could be dedicated for short and open purposes, and the other three could be used for testing up to three devices without needing to solder/desolder the components so frequently when making comparisons. Or some boards could be soldered with reference components so that you can always double-check that your meter is correctly set up maybe. Your design would also need kelvin traces, in the VNA case this is not possible so I've only got two wires going up to the point where the component or short etc is soldered.

     

    image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • fmilburn
    fmilburn over 4 years ago in reply to shabaz

    Hi shabaz

     

    Here is what I came up with.  The basic design was inspired by one from VoltLog, referenced in the blog above.  I've also added pads based on your suggestion above.

     

    Top

    image

    Bottom

    image

    Copper

    image

    I can get 3 made at OshPark with ENIG for $16 with shipping, so it is a reasonable cost.  The two holes on the diagonal are for mounting in a 3D case.  The two holes close to each other in the middle are for securing the cable coming in from the Kelvin clamps with small cable ties or wire.  The fingers that slide into the LCR meter are such that it should only go in with the correct orientation.

     

    My thought is to use one of the PCBs to make the Kelvin Clamps and the other two for testing smaller parts. One could have the pads shorted for calibration.  The other would be calibrated open and then the DUT soldered on for testing.  The Kelvin pads are on standard 0.1" spacing.

     

    I would appreciate your thoughts on the DUT pads.  The pads lengthwise are 9.7 mm.  The total width top to bottom is 3.75 mm.  I've split the pads lengthwise for 4-wire measurement.  The width between the two split halves top to bottom is 0.25 mm (same width I often use for TSSOP and OshPark can get solder mask in between).  The pad separation in the X direction is 0.7 mm which is what I would use for 0603 parts.  I am interested in you thoughts on the size of this DUT fixture.  I thought about making it bigger but don't want to make it smaller in order to keep the solder mask.

     

    Frank

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 4 years ago in reply to fmilburn

    Awesome! In that case I will likely add your gerbers to my next order too, since it will fit my LCR tool as well (mine does not have the guard slot, so I will just saw that tab off). it will be nice to finally easily test SMD parts!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • fmilburn
    fmilburn over 4 years ago in reply to shabaz

    Of course!  I added a scale at 1 mm intervals below so you can check it if you like.  The main pads are 15 mm x 15 mm and are spaced 4 mm apart.  I cut out a paper doll to check the fit on my meter and it is relatively snug - about 1 mm clearance to each side of the pads.  If it looks like it works for you I will remove the outline from around the guard and remove the pads.  It would only take a minute to do that and create new gerbers for you.

    image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 4 years ago in reply to fmilburn

    Here are the measurements of the connector I have here:

    image

    Hcur is 1 mm narrower than the two others. Also in my meter it is 1 mm narrower. There is a key to prevent wrong connection:


    I forgot to note down the gap. That's 6 mm. both times.image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 4 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps

    Jan Cumps  wrote:

     

    You *need* this. Price available via quote request only.

    image

    I did some more research. The Extech LCR205 is virtually the same device with a more modern molding. It costs 66 €.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 4 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps

    I wonder how universal that is.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 4 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps

    I wonder how universal that is.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 4 years ago in reply to Andrew J

    Andrew J  wrote:

     

    I wonder how universal that is.

    It isn't. I've seen meters where the guard is way narrower and Hi and Lo have the same size.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Andrew J
    Andrew J over 4 years ago in reply to Jan Cumps

    It's a shame because it looks very useful.  I'll probably get Frank's implementation made.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube