2 different Symbols for one device

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:07:33 +0100, "Jiri Rehorek" <info@rofa.cz>

wrote:

Can anyone explain me how to cvreate ONE device in library with 2 packages

and 2 different Symbols ? (each package has some other pins - so there I

will create separate symbols).

(If success - I will post the PIC18F4xJ50 library).

Jiri

What advantage is there in calling it one device, as opposed to two

different devices?

Robert Scott

Real-Time Specialties

Ypsilanti, Michigan

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:59:34 +0100, "Jiri Rehorek" <info@rofa.cz>

wrote:

For example

18F46J50 has 2 different packages and one package has some pins that are not

at other package, but together it is stil one device, so I do not want to

make 2 devices.

Again, I ask why not make two devices - 18F46J50-28 and 18F46J50-40  ?

"I don't want to" is not a reason.

Robert Scott

Real-Time Specialties

Ypsilanti, Michigan

For example

18F46J50 has 2 different packages and one package has some pins that are not

at other package, but together it is stil one device, so I do not want to

make 2 devices.

Jiri

"Robert Scott" <fake-email@szivuejdl.com> pí¹e v diskusním pøíspìvku

news:49be642a.16961656@news.cadsoft.de...

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:07:33 +0100, "Jiri Rehorek" <info@rofa.cz>

wrote:

 

Can anyone explain me how to cvreate ONE device in library with 2 packages

and 2 different Symbols ? (each package has some other pins - so there I

will create separate symbols).

(If success - I will post the PIC18F4xJ50 library).

Jiri

 

What advantage is there in calling it one device, as opposed to two

different devices?

 

 

Robert Scott

Real-Time Specialties

Ypsilanti, Michigan

Yes, you can see that it is not reason, but must of good things have not any

reason at the begining.

It is your opinion.

I do not want to follow discuss like that.

If you read carefully my question you can saw words

"Can anyone explain me how to......" and not the "I want to",

if you have something concrete to answer my question, you are welcome, if

not - simply do not answer.

Jiri

"Robert Scott" <fake-email@szivuejdl.com> pí¹e v diskusním pøíspìvku

news:49c0d635.6942593@news.cadsoft.de...

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:59:34 +0100, "Jiri Rehorek" <info@rofa.cz>

wrote:

 

For example

18F46J50 has 2 different packages and one package has some pins that are

not

at other package, but together it is stil one device, so I do not want to

make 2 devices.

 

Again, I ask why not make two devices - 18F46J50-28 and 18F46J50-40  ?

"I don't want to" is not a reason.

 

 

Robert Scott

Real-Time Specialties

Ypsilanti, Michigan

Jiri Rehorek wrote:

Yes, you can see that it is not reason, but must of good things have not any

reason at the begining.

It is your opinion.

I do not want to follow discuss like that.

If you read carefully my question you can saw words

"Can anyone explain me how to......" and not the "I want to",

if you have something concrete to answer my question, you are welcome, if

not - simply do not answer.

Jiri

 

Search this group's subject for multiple pins and in 2006 a thread

contains the answer. 1 pad to 1 pin is how eagle currently works and

that subject is the topic of many requests to allow 1 pin to many pads.

Paul R.