element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Autodesk EAGLE
  • Products
  • More
Autodesk EAGLE
EAGLE User Chat (English) Re: stupid question:  What's the difference between mil and mm?
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Autodesk EAGLE to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 170 subscribers
  • Views 675 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Re: stupid question:  What's the difference between mil and mm?

Former Member
Former Member over 15 years ago

 

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 15 years ago

    Moved to UserChat from Support

     

    "Tilmann Reh"  wrote

    James Morrison schrieb:

     

    I highly recommend never using the term "mil"--it is too ambiguous.

    ...

    If you 1/1000 of an inch then we use the term "thou".

     

    Sorry, but in my eyes "thou" is exactly as ambiguous as "mil". :-\

    It could mean a thousandth of about /everything/.

     

    Maybe it's from my european background, but additionally I have never

    heard "thou" before, except for Olin's post and yours - but "mil" is

    pretty common and (for me) unambiguous for tens of years... I never

    would have imagined someone could misinterpret it - one more evidence of

    small differences in language that can be dangerous...

     

    Tilmann

     

    This is a great coffee break discussion.

     

    As with any language,  interpretation  lies in the context.

    Additionally the context is affected by the history of a country, its

    culture.

    Within a culture colloquialisms  and phrase shortening occurs. This was

    acceptable in days of old where your interaction tended to be quite local

    and the risks of using the same sounding word to express something entirely

    different was low .  Now days with the global community  the risks and costs

    of misinterpretation are high so we need to ensure clarity for the receiver.

     

    Here in New Zealand, being an English Commonwealth country, my schooling

    involved the imperial measure. Small measurements below about 1/64 inch were

    done in thousands of and inch (Thou). It was handy to know that the

    thickness of a hacksaw blade was 25 thou., a handy size for setting spark

    plug gaps and engine tappets. In those years most product came from England

    or USA. Eventually we metricated and tape measures and rulers had both

    measures along their edges and imported product can be of either measure

    but predominately metric these days.   Now when I measure ,say, a table  I

    use millimetres but as I remember it I say 'mils' as the shortening of the

    word millimetre. Likely I am saying 'mill-s'  but it sounds the same. In my

    context, to me, I know what I mean. If I quoted the phrase 15mils to most

    people in this country they would interpret it as meaning 1.5 centimetres

    and not 15 milli-inches. To someone here in the PCB trade the interpretation

    would be 15 milliinches so long as the surrounding conversation supported

    that context but because of our history they would likely ask for

    confirmation. Currently any conversation with an engineering trade using

    'Thou' would be understood. In the future, if the entire world goes metric,

    thou will disappear from common use here just as yards have.

     

    Personally I have not heard 'thou' used in any other way.

    'Milli' immediately conveys 1/1000 to me.

    'mil' and 'mils' I know as 1/1000 inch but I need to confirm everytime it's

    not a shortening of millimetre.

     

    mil used with inch appears to be a mix of metric qualifier with an imperial

    measure, I could be wrong about this.

     

    Hope you enjoyed your coffee.

    Warren

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 15 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    "Warren Brayshaw" <warrenbrayshaw@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message

    news:hsndo1$oaa$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...

    Moved to UserChat from Support

     

    "Tilmann Reh"  wrote

    James Morrison schrieb:

     

    I highly recommend never using the term "mil"--it is too ambiguous.

    ...

    If you 1/1000 of an inch then we use the term "thou".

     

    Sorry, but in my eyes "thou" is exactly as ambiguous as "mil". :-\

    It could mean a thousandth of about /everything/.

     

    Maybe it's from my european background, but additionally I have never

    heard "thou" before, except for Olin's post and yours - but "mil" is

    pretty common and (for me) unambiguous for tens of years... I never

    would have imagined someone could misinterpret it - one more evidence of

    small differences in language that can be dangerous...

     

    Tilmann

     

    This is a great coffee break discussion.

     

    As with any language,  interpretation  lies in the context.

    Additionally the context is affected by the history of a country, its

    culture.

    Within a culture colloquialisms  and phrase shortening occurs. This was

    acceptable in days of old where your interaction tended to be quite local

    and the risks of using the same sounding word to express something

    entirely

    different was low .  Now days with the global community  the risks and

    costs

    of misinterpretation are high so we need to ensure clarity for the

    receiver.

     

    Here in New Zealand, being an English Commonwealth country, my schooling

    involved the imperial measure. Small measurements below about 1/64 inch

    were

    done in thousands of and inch (Thou). It was handy to know that the

    thickness of a hacksaw blade was 25 thou., a handy size for setting spark

    plug gaps and engine tappets. In those years most product came from

    England

    or USA. Eventually we metricated and tape measures and rulers had both

    measures along their edges and imported product can be of either measure

    but predominately metric these days.   Now when I measure ,say, a table  I

    use millimetres but as I remember it I say 'mils' as the shortening of the

    word millimetre. Likely I am saying 'mill-s'  but it sounds the same. In

    my

    context, to me, I know what I mean. If I quoted the phrase 15mils to most

    people in this country they would interpret it as meaning 1.5 centimetres

    and not 15 milli-inches. To someone here in the PCB trade the

    interpretation

    would be 15 milliinches so long as the surrounding conversation supported

    that context but because of our history they would likely ask for

    confirmation. Currently any conversation with an engineering trade using

    'Thou' would be understood. In the future, if the entire world goes

    metric,

    thou will disappear from common use here just as yards have.

     

    Personally I have not heard 'thou' used in any other way.

    'Milli' immediately conveys 1/1000 to me.

    'mil' and 'mils' I know as 1/1000 inch but I need to confirm everytime

    it's

    not a shortening of millimetre.

     

    mil used with inch appears to be a mix of metric qualifier with an

    imperial

    measure, I could be wrong about this.

     

    Hope you enjoyed your coffee.

    Warren

     

     

     

    How big is your coffee cup? 275 mls

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 15 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    Greg Erskine wrote:

    "Warren Brayshaw" <warrenbrayshaw@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message

    news:hsndo1$oaa$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...

    Moved to UserChat from Support

     

    "Tilmann Reh"  wrote

    James Morrison schrieb:

     

    I highly recommend never using the term "mil"--it is too ambiguous.

    ...

    If you 1/1000 of an inch then we use the term "thou".

    Sorry, but in my eyes "thou" is exactly as ambiguous as "mil". :-\

    It could mean a thousandth of about /everything/.

     

    Maybe it's from my european background, but additionally I have never

    heard "thou" before, except for Olin's post and yours - but "mil" is

    pretty common and (for me) unambiguous for tens of years... I never

    would have imagined someone could misinterpret it - one more evidence of

    small differences in language that can be dangerous...

     

    Tilmann

    This is a great coffee break discussion.

     

    As with any language,  interpretation  lies in the context.

    Additionally the context is affected by the history of a country, its

    culture.

    Within a culture colloquialisms  and phrase shortening occurs. This was

    acceptable in days of old where your interaction tended to be quite local

    and the risks of using the same sounding word to express something

    entirely

    different was low .  Now days with the global community  the risks and

    costs

    of misinterpretation are high so we need to ensure clarity for the

    receiver.

     

    Here in New Zealand, being an English Commonwealth country, my schooling

    involved the imperial measure. Small measurements below about 1/64 inch

    were

    done in thousands of and inch (Thou). It was handy to know that the

    thickness of a hacksaw blade was 25 thou., a handy size for setting spark

    plug gaps and engine tappets. In those years most product came from

    England

    or USA. Eventually we metricated and tape measures and rulers had both

    measures along their edges and imported product can be of either measure

    but predominately metric these days.   Now when I measure ,say, a table  I

    use millimetres but as I remember it I say 'mils' as the shortening of the

    word millimetre. Likely I am saying 'mill-s'  but it sounds the same. In

    my

    context, to me, I know what I mean. If I quoted the phrase 15mils to most

    people in this country they would interpret it as meaning 1.5 centimetres

    and not 15 milli-inches. To someone here in the PCB trade the

    interpretation

    would be 15 milliinches so long as the surrounding conversation supported

    that context but because of our history they would likely ask for

    confirmation. Currently any conversation with an engineering trade using

    'Thou' would be understood. In the future, if the entire world goes

    metric,

    thou will disappear from common use here just as yards have.

     

    Personally I have not heard 'thou' used in any other way.

    'Milli' immediately conveys 1/1000 to me.

    'mil' and 'mils' I know as 1/1000 inch but I need to confirm everytime

    it's

    not a shortening of millimetre.

     

    mil used with inch appears to be a mix of metric qualifier with an

    imperial

    measure, I could be wrong about this.

     

    Hope you enjoyed your coffee.

    Warren

     

     

     

    How big is your coffee cup? 275 mls

     

     

    27.5 table spoons? SCNR image

     

    Anyhow, this mils business has cost a pretty penny once at a company. We

    had hired several UK engineers and they thought of mils as millimeters.

    While our machine shop thought it was ... and made the part "to order".

     

    --

    Regards, Joerg

     

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

     

    "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.

    Use another domain or send PM.

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 15 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    warrenbrayshaw wrote on Sat, 15 May 2010 20:15

    if the entire world goes metric,

    thou will disappear from common use here just as yards have.

     

    I doubt yards have dissappeared.  If the center circle of your soccer

    fields is 9.14m in radius, then you're only pretending yards are gone.

     

    --

    Web access to CadSoft support forums at www.eaglecentral.ca.  Where the CadSoft EAGLE community meets.

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 15 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    warrenbrayshaw wrote >

    if the entire world goes metric,

    thou will disappear from common use here just as yards have.

     

    "Olin Lathrop"  wrote>

    I doubt yards have dissappeared.  If the center circle of your soccer

    fields is 9.14m in radius, then you're only pretending yards are gone.

     

     

    Use of that measurement standard has gone. The distance/dimension remains

    but what units we use to specify it by can be anything and will be the

    system that is in vogue.

    The groundsman would currently layout the field using a metric rule although

    the dimension equates to exact yards.

    Changing the sport to cricket, the pitch is one chain long (20.1168m) and I

    doubt the groundsman has a ruler marked in chains.

     

    You believed using the dimensions of a soccer field was a good way to

    illustrate your point.  I get your point but an earlier point was the

    importance of understanding the culture of the recipient when communicating.

     

    To illustrate, although growing in presence, soccer is not a big sport in

    New Zealand. Only this year has there been a marked increase in television

    coverage of international football activities.

    If asked, I could not have told you the dimension of the centre circle. With

    consideration I could have probably deduced that its origins would have

    dictated the field be measured in yards.

     

    Hence, getting back to mils, mm inch and mic, usage of terms is only valid

    if familiarity is similar.

     

    Warren

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 15 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    Warren Brayshaw wrote:

    warrenbrayshaw wrote >

    if the entire world goes metric,

    thou will disappear from common use here just as yards have.

     

    "Olin Lathrop"  wrote>

    I doubt yards have dissappeared.  If the center circle of your soccer

    fields is 9.14m in radius, then you're only pretending yards are gone.

     

     

    Use of that measurement standard has gone. The distance/dimension remains

    but what units we use to specify it by can be anything and will be the

    system that is in vogue.

     

     

    Here in the US the "yard" is by no means gone. When we recently had our

    house re-roofed all the estimates quoted the material in square-yards.

     

    --

    Regards, Joerg

     

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

     

    "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.

    Use another domain or send PM.

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 15 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

     

    Warren Brayshaw wrote:

    warrenbrayshaw wrote >

    if the entire world goes metric,

    thou will disappear from common use here just as yards have.

     

    "Olin Lathrop"  wrote>

    I doubt yards have dissappeared.  If the center circle of your soccer

    fields is 9.14m in radius, then you're only pretending yards are gone.

     

     

    Use of that measurement standard has gone. The distance/dimension

    remains

    but what units we use to specify it by can be anything and will be the

    system that is in vogue.

    "Joerg"  wrote.

    Here in the US the "yard" is by no means gone. When we recently had our

    house re-roofed all the estimates quoted the material in square-yards.

     

     

    Exactly. Yards are still in vogue for US.

     

    Joerg's reply is a good example of conveying culture and context to increase

    the probability that the recipient interprets the message correctly.

    "US" conveys culture context

    "house re-roofed" conveys scale/subject and provides a reference to check

    the used unit (square-yards) against thus increasing the confidence in ones

    understanding.

     

    Warren

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube