element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      • Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Autodesk EAGLE
  • Products
  • More
Autodesk EAGLE
EAGLE User Support (English) Struggling with thermal pads - how should it be done?
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Autodesk EAGLE to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • State Verified Answer
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 179 subscribers
  • Views 1764 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Struggling with thermal pads - how should it be done?

skajam66
skajam66 over 9 years ago

Hi,

 

I'm trying to create a package that has an exposed thermal pad with multiple connections to the bottom layer part of the thermal pad. I have searched various forums and I still do not see how to do it. Most answers to this question, or similar, talk about placing vias on top of an SMD pad. However, when designing a package, you cannot place vias - only through-hole pads.

I have tried using SMD pads, poured polygons and rectangles as the base copper and placed TH pads on top and I always get some form of overlap error from DRC.

 

Here is an example of a PDSO-10 package and the result of running DRC. This particular example uses an SMD pad as the base with 5 TH pads on top. As you can see, I get 5 overlap errors. If I replace the SMD base pad with a poured polygon or a rectangle, I also get overlap errors. The overlap errors are due to the copper, not any other layer such as tStop or tCream. I have determined that fact by selectively hiding layers and testing if the overlap errors go away.

image

In the package design I have named the SMD pad and the TH pads EP@1, EP@2, etc. etc. In the Symbol design, I have a pin named EP. Eagle version is 6.5. My design rules are:

image

Any ideas?

 

Kind regards,

AC

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    0 autodeskguest over 9 years ago

    On 25.04.2016 13:27, Andrew Coad wrote:

    Hi,

     

    I'm trying to create a package that has an exposed thermal pad with

    multiple connections to the bottom layer part of the thermal pad. I have

    searched various forums and I still do not see how to do it. Most

    answers to this question, or similar, talk about placing vias on top of

    an SMD pad. However, when designing a package, you cannot place vias -

    only through-hole pads.

    I have tried using SMD pads, poured polygons and rectangles as the base

    copper and placed TH pads on top and I always get some form of overlap

    error from DRC.

     

    Here is an example of a PDSO-10 package and the result of running DRC.

    This particular example uses an SMD pad as the base with 5 TH pads on

    top. As you can see, I get 5 overlap errors. If I replace the SMD base

    pad with a poured polygon or a rectangle, I also get overlap errors. The

    overlap errors are due to the copper, not any other layer such as tStop

    or tCream. I have determined that fact by selectively hiding layers and

    testing if the overlap errors go away.

    In the package design I have named the SMD pad and the TH pads EP@1,

    EP@2, etc. etc. In the Symbol design, I have a pin named EP. Eagle

    version is 6.5. My design rules are:

    Any ideas?

     

    Use PADS as vias, add a SMD covering them. In the device editor connect

    all the thermal pads within the polygon to same symbol pin. First pad

    with "connect", the others via "append". Check the img attached for the

    DRV.GND pin.

     

    Note, when you use large smd pads, you may have to draw paste (and maybe

    stop) masks manually. The datasheets often provide some suggestions how

    to do this.

     

     

     

     

    Attachments:
    image
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    0 autodeskguest over 9 years ago

    On 25.04.2016 13:27, Andrew Coad wrote:

    Hi,

     

    I'm trying to create a package that has an exposed thermal pad with

    multiple connections to the bottom layer part of the thermal pad. I have

    searched various forums and I still do not see how to do it. Most

    answers to this question, or similar, talk about placing vias on top of

    an SMD pad. However, when designing a package, you cannot place vias -

    only through-hole pads.

    I have tried using SMD pads, poured polygons and rectangles as the base

    copper and placed TH pads on top and I always get some form of overlap

    error from DRC.

     

    Here is an example of a PDSO-10 package and the result of running DRC.

    This particular example uses an SMD pad as the base with 5 TH pads on

    top. As you can see, I get 5 overlap errors. If I replace the SMD base

    pad with a poured polygon or a rectangle, I also get overlap errors. The

    overlap errors are due to the copper, not any other layer such as tStop

    or tCream. I have determined that fact by selectively hiding layers and

    testing if the overlap errors go away.

    In the package design I have named the SMD pad and the TH pads EP@1,

    EP@2, etc. etc. In the Symbol design, I have a pin named EP. Eagle

    version is 6.5. My design rules are:

    Any ideas?

     

    Use PADS as vias, add a SMD covering them. In the device editor connect

    all the thermal pads within the polygon to same symbol pin. First pad

    with "connect", the others via "append". Check the img attached for the

    DRV.GND pin.

     

    Note, when you use large smd pads, you may have to draw paste (and maybe

    stop) masks manually. The datasheets often provide some suggestions how

    to do this.

     

     

     

     

    Attachments:
    image
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    0 autodeskguest over 9 years ago

    On 25.04.2016 13:27, Andrew Coad wrote:

    Hi,

     

    I'm trying to create a package that has an exposed thermal pad with

    multiple connections to the bottom layer part of the thermal pad. I have

    searched various forums and I still do not see how to do it. Most

    answers to this question, or similar, talk about placing vias on top of

    an SMD pad. However, when designing a package, you cannot place vias -

    only through-hole pads.

    I have tried using SMD pads, poured polygons and rectangles as the base

    copper and placed TH pads on top and I always get some form of overlap

    error from DRC.

     

    Here is an example of a PDSO-10 package and the result of running DRC.

    This particular example uses an SMD pad as the base with 5 TH pads on

    top. As you can see, I get 5 overlap errors. If I replace the SMD base

    pad with a poured polygon or a rectangle, I also get overlap errors. The

    overlap errors are due to the copper, not any other layer such as tStop

    or tCream. I have determined that fact by selectively hiding layers and

    testing if the overlap errors go away.

    In the package design I have named the SMD pad and the TH pads EP@1,

    EP@2, etc. etc. In the Symbol design, I have a pin named EP. Eagle

    version is 6.5. My design rules are:

    Any ideas?

     

    Use PADS as vias, add a SMD covering them. In the device editor connect

    all the thermal pads within the polygon to same symbol pin. First pad

    with "connect", the others via "append". Check the img attached for the

    DRV.GND pin.

     

    Note, when you use large smd pads, you may have to draw paste (and maybe

    stop) masks manually. The datasheets often provide some suggestions how

    to do this.

     

     

     

     

    Attachments:
    image
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • skajam66
    0 skajam66 over 9 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    Thank you very much. I have it working now. What did I change? Hmmm... I had named the SMD and TH pads EP@1, EP@2 etc. When I changed them all to EP1, EP2 etc. it worked just fine.

     

    Regards,

    AC

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2026 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube