element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      • Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Autodesk EAGLE
  • Products
  • More
Autodesk EAGLE
EAGLE User Support (English) Quadcopter flight control board routing
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Autodesk EAGLE to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • State Verified Answer
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Answers 2 answers
  • Subscribers 178 subscribers
  • Views 730 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Quadcopter flight control board routing

Pedro147
Pedro147 over 9 years ago

I am in the process of redesigning my quadcopter flight control board from running brushed to brushless motors . This necessitated me adding a 5v buck boost regulator and some other minor changes as well as completely relocating or re-orientating virtually every component on the board. As you can no doubt tell from my board layout I am a novice when it comes to PCB routing but I have done the best that I can so far. The circuit is proven so it is just a matter of finalising the routing so I can get some test PCB's made and build them out at home which I am completely comfortable and experienced at doing.

 

Even with the first successful brushed version of this board the Iteadstudio DRC would flag clearance errors on the Atmega, MPU6050, and Molex connectors and this has not proved to be an issue as I have made around twenty of these boards with no issues and they perform flawlessly.

 

With this in mind I am wary of believing some clearance issues being flagged by the DRC on this board but would just like someone to cast an eye over what I have done and point out any glaringly obvious omissions or mistakes that may stop the board from functioning from what they can see. Being a novice I realise that a seasoned professional would make a much more elegant job of the routing but I am not after perfection or anything close to it, just something that will work and that I can hand assemble. When I run rats nest I can see a lot of un-routed airwires but if I run a "run length ulp" it only shows two un-routed wires. I have not checked through all the clearance errors but as I said the only ones that I would be concerned with are trace to trace and/or via clearances.

 

Thank you for any help or advice of a constructive nature and thanks for your time,

Pedro

Attachments:
Final _Gyro Oriented same as AF CN.zip
  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • Pedro147
    Pedro147 over 8 years ago in reply to Pedro147 +2
    Just as a final update I had these PCB's manufactured and I successfully.assembled some at home. They have performed flawlessly so far which is a very pleasing outcome for me and I once again thank you…
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 9 years ago in reply to Pedro147 +1 verified
    On 19.10.2016 05:15, Peter Newman wrote: Thanks for your advice and suggestions Morten, I appreciate your time. The battery and USB powering is used only during fIrmware and bootloader flashing. Thanks…
  • Pedro147
    Pedro147 over 9 years ago in reply to autodeskguest +1
    Thank you so much for your help and advice Morten. I set the clearances as you suggested and got them down to 30 odd and them slowly worked my way though them by re positioning traces and some GND plane…
  • autodeskguest
    0 autodeskguest over 9 years ago

    On 17.10.2016 12:42, Peter Newman wrote:

    I am in the process of redesigning my quadcopter flight control board from running brushed to brushless motors . This necessitated me adding a 5v buck boost regulator and some other minor changes as well as completely relocating or re-orientating virtually every component on the board. As you can no doubt tell from my board layout I am a novice when it comes to PCB routing but I have done the best that I can so far. The circuit is proven so it is just a matter of finalising the routing so I can get some test PCB's made and build them out at home which I am completely comfortable and experienced at doing.

     

    Even with the first successful brushed version of this board the Iteadstudio DRC would flag clearance errors on the Atmega, MPU6050, and Molex connectors and this has not proved to be an issue as I have made around twenty of these boards with no issues and they perform flawlessly.

     

    With this in mind I am wary of believing some clearance issues being flagged by the DRC on this board but would just like someone to cast an eye over what I have done and point out any glaringly obvious omissions or mistakes that may stop the board from functioning from what they can see. Being a novice I realise that a seasoned professional would make a much more elegant job of the routing but I am not after perfection or anything close to it, just something that will work and that I can hand assemble. When I run rats nest I can see a lot of un-routed airwires but if I run a "run length ulp" it only shows two un-routed wires. I have not checked through all the clearance errors but as I said the only ones that I would be concerned with are trace to trace and/or via clearances.

     

    Thank you for any help or advice of a constructive nature and thanks for your time,

    Pedro

     

     

    -The schematic is missing, so I can't look at the circuits or even

    identify the components functions, wich is somewhat important for

    layout, especially when it comes to smps regulators.

     

    -When I do ratsnest, there are 26 serious airwires left. Maybe you need

    to add gnd vias around here and ther?

     

    -A quick look at clearances tell me these are probably fine.

     

    -A quick look at the +5v net suggests that you have been sloppy with

    decoupling capacitors. Since this board contains a xyz sensor, I'd be

    careful with power- and ambient noise. A smps reg just next to it may

    have undesired effects.

     

    If I were you, I would add another two layers (dedicated gnd and

    +5v/vcc) and get this manufactured in China at very low cost.

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • Pedro147
    0 Pedro147 over 9 years ago

    For some reason I could not attach the schematic as well as the board file in my initial post, presumably because of size restrictions so I am now doing so.

     

    @CadSoft Guest thank you for your response. Unfortunately I am limited to two layers as I only have access to the Freeware version of Eagle.

     

    Might you be able to point me to any information on how to connect these remaining air wires to the ground planes please. I will also look at the possibility of some decoupling caps on the 5v net and what might be considered a minimum distance between the IMU and v-Reg thank you.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    0 autodeskguest over 9 years ago in reply to Pedro147

    On 17.10.2016 21:08, Peter Newman wrote:

    For some reason I could not attach the schematic as well as the board file in my initial post, presumably because of size restrictions so I am now doing so Thanks

     

    Some comments on the schematics (yea, I know you said the circuit is

    proven, but still):

     

    -I am not sure if you can plug the battery direct to USB like that. That

    is outside my knowledge, and I would have to check it out. Maybe the

    battery type allows this, or maybe you dont care if its overcharged, and

    maybe it doesn't matter if it catches fire during charging image

     

    -For easier BOM management and to optimize volume pricing, I'd consider

    replacing the U3 (TPS63001) and U$3 (TPS63002?) with the same adjustable

    output voltage chip (TPS63000). (For tidyness, you may want to rename U$3)

     

    - How are the brushless motors driven, and what current do they need?

    Driving with a logic output sounds harsh. If the motors have a speed

    control input, at least I would assume you need some direct voltage.

    And, I would also expect some reverse voltage protection diode over the

    motor drive.

     

    Back to the layout

     

    -Make the VCC track routing wider. Make sure there is a thick wire from

    the battery to the regulators. Also make sure the gnd wire/fill is just

    as thick. The other power tracks could do with some improving too. Some

    tracks take totally wild directions, like 5v below u$3.

     

    -You default class 0 clearance has been set to 10. Set it to 0 and use

    general 6mm clearance rule. Also, the 10mil clearance set on the vcc and

    gnd is impossible to meet because of pad sizes and placement. Get rid of

    them, or set them to min (8mil seems to do). The clearances left now can

    be resolved by fine tuning.

     

    -There is an excess of layer crossings. You can optimize that if you want.

     

    -Personally I prefer to route stuff to grid and 45deg angles. That helps

    me keep tidyness and I know if I see something off, I know something was

    moved and needs some cleanup. I see yours is a bit messy, although it

    will work if the DRC and airwire issues are cleared.

     

    -Check the position of the xyz sensor. If its in a quadcopter, I would

    assume the ideal position would be at the center of the copter, but

    maybe that can be offset in software? Or maybe the pcb is slightly

    offset on the copter itself? In any case, make sure its far away from

    noisy components (maybe there is a note about that in the datasheet?) L2

    looks a bit threatening.

     

    -And, like last time, check the need for decoupling caps.

     

    Before you go on fixing the routing, I suggest you fix the airwires. To

    fix them you need to add several vias, and they may need you to move

    stuff around, creating new clearance issues.

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • Pedro147
    0 Pedro147 over 9 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    Thanks for your advice and suggestions Morten, I appreciate your time.  The battery and USB  powering is used only during fIrmware and bootloader flashing. Thanks for the suggestion on the adjustable buck boost I'll look into that but these are only limited production runs done at home. The logic level output is only used as a signal into the Electronic Speed Controller for each motor and the motor is independently powered from another battery.

     

    Regarding your suggestions on adjusting my min clearance settings in the DRU check, I am not certain of exactly where to adjust those settings but I assume it may be in Edit > Net Classes? Any chance that you could be more specific as there are quite a few different places to adjust things in all those tabs.

     

    Thanks again you have been a big help.

     

    image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    0 autodeskguest over 9 years ago in reply to Pedro147

    On 19.10.2016 05:15, Peter Newman wrote:

    Thanks for your advice and suggestions Morten, I appreciate your time.  The battery and USB  powering is used only during fIrmware and bootloader flashing. Thanks for the suggestion on the adjustable buck boost I'll look into that but these are only limited production runs done at home. The logic level output is only used as a signal into the Electronic Speed Controller for each motor and the motor is independently powered from another battery.

     

    Regarding your suggestions on adjusting my min clearance settings in the DRU check, I am not certain of exactly where to adjust those settings but I assume it may be in Edit > Net Classes? Any chance that you could be more specific as there are quite a few different places to adjust things in all those tabs.

     

    Thanks again you have been a big help.

     

    Yes, you are right regarding the location of the net classes edit.

    (The general clearance stettings are under a tab in the DRC settings

    box). In the net classes box, you will find the last "clearance" column

    for class 0 set to 10mil. Set it to 0, and for class1 and class2, set it

    to 8.

     

    Now rerun a DRC. The clearance errors that are left can be fixed by

    modifying the routing slightly.

     

    But as I mentioned, first fix the airwire issues. Read the lower left

    status message after a ratsnest is done. It will tell you how many

    airwires are left. Unfortunately Eagle doesn't report those in

    the DRC issue list, although it has been a topic on the suggest forum

    for a while.

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • Pedro147
    0 Pedro147 over 9 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    Thank you so much for your help and advice Morten. I set the clearances as you suggested and got them down to 30 odd and them slowly worked my way though them by re positioning traces and some GND plane vias until I now have no errors at all. I have taken your other suggestions on board and will also incorporate upsizing of some power traces and decoupling of the 5v supply as well.

     

    I realise that my routing is far from an elegant solution by seeing as it is the first circuit of this complexity that I have routed totally myself, I am very pleased with the outcome. Of course until I submit the boards to a fab house and assemble them I will not know if my project is a success but I am extremely confident of the outcome image

     

    People like you are a Godsend to beginners like myself and once again Thank you for your time, help and encouragement

     

    Pedro image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • Pedro147
    0 Pedro147 over 8 years ago in reply to Pedro147

    Just as a final update I had these PCB's manufactured and I successfully.assembled some at home. They have performed flawlessly so far which is a very pleasing outcome for me and I once again thank  you for your help and advice Morten.

     

     

    image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube