Is there a way to do this?
I have two different schematics but I want to use 1 universal board
Most of the parts are empty or values changed.
I cant think of a clean way to do it
Thanks
Is there a way to do this?
I have two different schematics but I want to use 1 universal board
Most of the parts are empty or values changed.
I cant think of a clean way to do it
Thanks
Greetings John Suhr,
on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 you wrote saying :
Is there a way to do this?
I have two different schematics but I want to use 1 universal board
Most of the parts are empty or values changed.
I cant think of a clean way to do it
Normal practice is to design the schematic as the super-set, but set the
values of many of the components as "do not fit" or similar. You end up
with a schematic which, at first sight, makes no sense - and often fails
ERC because there are multiple output pins on a single net. However,
it's a common enough technique and board populating houses are generally
quite happy to handle parts lists with unfitted parts.
What it doesn't do well is really different boards, or simple selection
of which variant you're building. Your description suggests maybe the
two circuits you want to build are quite different, so the usual trick
may not suit, but it does work well for variants such as normally
fitting an RS-232RS-232 interface but having the option of RS-422 instead
--
Rob Pearce http://www.bdt-home.demon.co.uk
The contents of this | Windows NT crashed.
message are purely | I am the Blue Screen of Death.
my opinion. Don't | No one hears your screams.
believe a word. |
"Robert Pearce" <news@bdt-home.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:uaJF47KzilnHFwKn@daniel.huneausware.local...
Greetings John Suhr,
on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 you wrote saying :
Is there a way to do this?
I have two different schematics but I want to use 1 universal board
Most of the parts are empty or values changed.
I cant think of a clean way to do it
Normal practice is to design the schematic as the super-set, but set the
values of many of the components as "do not fit" or similar. You end up
with a schematic which, at first sight, makes no sense - and often fails
ERC because there are multiple output pins on a single net. However, it's
a common enough technique and board populating houses are generally quite
happy to handle parts lists with unfitted parts.
What it doesn't do well is really different boards, or simple selection of
which variant you're building. Your description suggests maybe the two
circuits you want to build are quite different, so the usual trick may not
suit, but it does work well for variants such as normally fitting an
RS-232RS-232interface but having the option of RS-422 instead
--
Rob Pearce http://www.bdt-home.demon.co.uk
Well we populate the board so that isnt an issue
But in order to have connectivity of the schematics with the board and one
of the schematics the board and schematic need the same name as I
understand.
So I could keep changing the name but this is a pain.
Also to show part VALUE on the board for assembly I can think of no other
way except for instance X-470K where first value is product 1 and second
value is product 2 then I need to highlight the second value with a marker
to make sure my gals stuff the right part.
The way I used to do it the board and schematic were not linked so I could
just generate a report from each schematic I was also able to change the
text color which is helpful
Thanks
JS
John Suhr wrote:
...
The way I used to do it the board and schematic were not linked so I could
just generate a report from each schematic I was also able to change the
text color which is helpful
Thanks
JS
You can still do this in the current version of EAGLE. We do.
When you have a completed board/schematic that contains all parts that
are used in all products, create copies of the schematic only for each
of the unique products. You'll then have to go through each of the
schematics and manually update part values and place a "Not Used", N/A,
or whatever you want in the value for all parts not used. We don't keep
a board file for these "schematic only drawings" since they don't match
the physical board. The "real" schematic for the board never gets
published as a drawing, only the "schematic only drawings".
Instructions for putting parts on the PCB are created as a separate
drawing in OpenOffice.org. They contain tables as follows
Part Number | Description | Part Name(s) | Quantity |
A seperate table is created for SMD and through-hole parts. Then a
component map picture is included to aid in locating parts. Special
notes concerning assembly (IPC standards, conformal coating, etc.) are
also on this drawing. If you need x-y coordinates for each component
there are several ulp files available from EAGLE that do a great job.
I've probably said way too much, but that's how we solve the issue.
That said, version 5 of EAGLE will have attributes for parts that you
can specify. You will be able to create an attribute containing part
value, your company part number, or whatever else for each part. Then
based on these custom attributes you could create a parts list report
for each product. I haven't tried this with the beta version yet, but
if I understand the feature correctly, it should work.
Tom Sneddon