element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      • Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Autodesk EAGLE
  • Products
  • More
Autodesk EAGLE
EAGLE User Support (English) Downgrading brd/sch from V5 -> V4
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Autodesk EAGLE to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 15 replies
  • Subscribers 181 subscribers
  • Views 1060 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Downgrading brd/sch from V5 -> V4

nickds1
nickds1 over 17 years ago

I've been playing with V5, and very nice it is too! (thanks guys).

 

However, I publish a few designs on the web & elsewhere, and the bottom line

is that very few Eagle users will be on V5 for some time, especially as its

a cost-option and V4.16r2 is pretty stable.

 

So, can I save/export a V5 project in V4 format, such that V4 users can work

with it? Even MS Word allows this sort of functionality. A ULP that stripped

all the V5 extras (attributes etc.) would probably be the route to take...

 

Is this possible/has it been done?

 

Thanks

 

Nick

 

 

 

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • Richard_H
    Richard_H over 17 years ago

    Nick de Smith schrieb:

    I've been playing with V5, and very nice it is too! (thanks guys).

     

    However, I publish a few designs on the web & elsewhere, and the bottom line

    is that very few Eagle users will be on V5 for some time, especially as its

    a cost-option and V4.16r2 is pretty stable.

     

    So, can I save/export a V5 project in V4 format, such that V4 users can work

    with it? Even MS Word allows this sort of functionality. A ULP that stripped

    all the V5 extras (attributes etc.) would probably be the route to take...

     

    Is this possible/has it been done?

     

    Thanks

     

    Nick

     

     

     

    EAGLE can't save the files in an older data format. Changes in the

    data structure are partially irreversible and new features can't

    be interpreted by older EAGLE version. This could cause losses in

    your drawings.

     

    And by the way:

    A simply written text with a few letters arranged on a sheet

    can't be compared to a schematic/layout design, can it? image scnr

     

     

     

     

    --

    Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards

    Richard Hammerl

      CadSoft Support -- hotline@cadsoft.de

      FAQ: http://www.cadsoft.de/faq.htm

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • nickds1
    nickds1 over 17 years ago

     

    "Richard Hammerl" <ric@cadsoft.de> wrote in message

    news:g3qo41$uhu$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...

    EAGLE can't save the files in an older data format. Changes in the

    data structure are partially irreversible and new features can't

    be interpreted by older EAGLE version. This could cause losses in

    your drawings.

     

    If you read my initial posting, I mentioned that the enhanced functionality

    of V5 would have to be removed in the transfer, but the truth is a lot of

    that is subtle, such as the treatment of xref lables etc (which can always

    go back to being plain lables in V4).

     

    There are ULPs around that extract all sorts of data from SCH/BRD files -

    netlists, parts etc. I was merely wondering how hard it would be to export

    from V5 & then import into V4 such data.

     

    As I also pointed out, many other products do this - e.g. MS Word 2007 can

    export in many formats, including those of previous versions of Word, even

    though some formatting etc. may be lost... In Eagle's case, the base

    requirements for a consistent schematic at least haven't changed -

    components & a netlist. Nice things like attributes etc. can be dropped as

    they don't directly impact the logical integrity of the schematic.

     

    And by the way:

    A simply written text with a few letters arranged on a sheet

    can't be compared to a schematic/layout design, can it? image scnr

     

    ?? I'm not sure what you mean by this. The whole point of my request is that

    there is (and will be for some time) a very large constituency of V4 users

    who will not be able to play with anything created under V5, which makes

    those who publish designs hold back from upgrading.

     

    Nick

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • esilviu
    esilviu over 17 years ago

    I think you are searching for attached files.... image

    exporting works, except for components that aren't in Eagle4's libraries.

     

     

     

     

     

    "Nick de Smith" <nick@desmith.net> wrote in message

    news:g3obfd$jle$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...

    I've been playing with V5, and very nice it is too! (thanks guys).

     

    However, I publish a few designs on the web & elsewhere, and the bottom

    line

    is that very few Eagle users will be on V5 for some time, especially as

    its

    a cost-option and V4.16r2 is pretty stable.

     

    So, can I save/export a V5 project in V4 format, such that V4 users can

    work

    with it? Even MS Word allows this sort of functionality. A ULP that

    stripped

    all the V5 extras (attributes etc.) would probably be the route to take...

     

    Is this possible/has it been done?

     

    Thanks

     

    Nick

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    On 2008/Jun/24 8:08 AM, in article g3qo41$uhu$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de, "Richard

    Hammerl" <ric@cadsoft.de> wrote:

     

    Nick de Smith schrieb:

    I've been playing with V5, and very nice it is too! (thanks guys).

     

    However, I publish a few designs on the web & elsewhere, and the bottom line

    is that very few Eagle users will be on V5 for some time, especially as its

    a cost-option and V4.16r2 is pretty stable.

     

    So, can I save/export a V5 project in V4 format, such that V4 users can work

    with it? Even MS Word allows this sort of functionality. A ULP that stripped

    all the V5 extras (attributes etc.) would probably be the route to take...

     

    Is this possible/has it been done?

     

    Thanks

     

    Nick

     

     

     

    EAGLE can't save the files in an older data format. Changes in the

    data structure are partially irreversible and new features can't

    be interpreted by older EAGLE version. This could cause losses in

    your drawings.

     

    Hi Richard,

     

    Would it not be possible to include "Save As..." with an option to store in

    an older file formats (3.5, 4.0, 4.1)?  Almost every program I know allows

    for this.  Even Microsoft, the king of forced upgrades for little value has

    this feature.  Given the code exists already it doesn't appear to be

    technically infeasible.  I suppose it would increase the code size somewhat

    but it can't be that different.  Even if it was would it matter?

     

    This small addition would make the transition between versions easier to

    deal with.  And for people like us who have customers who use different

    versions of EAGLE, being able to save into different formats would allow us

    to use the feature enhancements of V5 (GUI, MAC OS X native, ...) and send

    files to our customers who are still using 4.x.

     

    And by the way:

    A simply written text with a few letters arranged on a sheet

    can't be compared to a schematic/layout design, can it? image scnr

     

    If you mean a Word file is less complex than a PCB design, I'm not sure that

    you're right.  Embedded OLE, crazy formatting, auto-numbering, ....

     

    Cheers,

     

    James.

     

    --

     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    ~                                          ~

    ~  James Morrison  ~~~  Stratford Digital  ~

    ~                                          ~

    ~  email:  sales@eagletoolkit.com          ~

    ~  fax:    888.701.8097                    ~

    ~  web:    http://www.eagletoolkit.com     ~

    ~                                          ~

    ~  Online EAGLE Dealer for US and Canada   ~

    ~  EAGLE Design Experts                    ~

    ~  EAGLE Enterprise Toolkit                ~

    ~                                          ~

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Richard_H
    Richard_H over 17 years ago

    James Morrison schrieb:

     

     

    Hi Richard,

     

    Would it not be possible to include "Save As..." with an option to store in

    an older file formats (3.5, 4.0, 4.1)?  Almost every program I know allows

    for this.  Even Microsoft, the king of forced upgrades for little value has

    this feature.  Given the code exists already it doesn't appear to be

    technically infeasible.  I suppose it would increase the code size somewhat

    but it can't be that different.  Even if it was would it matter?

     

     

     

    One the one hand I support your point. Of course it would be nice

    to have the possibility to design a board in EAGLE 5 and save it

    in EAGLE 4.1 data format, or as you propose even in 4.0 or 3.5.

    So far so good. To have such an option would be very nice.....

     

    ...but what if the quality of the board in EAGLE 4.1 or 4.0

    is not the same as in EAGLE 5?

    Let's take ARCs, for example:

    Now they can have signals, in EAGLE 4.0 they can't. Suddenly

    you will get lots of DRC errors, RATSNEST tells you something

    about unrouted airwires. Or for example a polygon: It can have

    a round shape. This is not possible in EAGLE 4. It can't be

    displayed anymore in the layout.

    Or an example from version 5 to 4.1:

    Define attibutes for your components. All this information would

    be lost... Yes I know, we could write it in a layer as simple

    text, so not everything would lost.

    Or, for example, make a partlist with a bom.ulp that exports

    attributes. The partlist made with EAGLE 4.1 of the same board/

    schematic would be different. Again arcs: Now the can have

    rounded ends and Gerber export uses an aperture that has

    the same diameter as the arc's width. Go back to EAGLE 4.1 and

    you will have arcs with flat ends. Gerber will use a fine

    width for emulating the arcs. In the worst case the arc is not

    visible on your board.

    And now let's assume your partner (the one with EAGLE 4.1)

    changes something in the board and you want to load it again

    EAGLE 5. I think I can foresee that this might end up in a kind

    of desaster. Not in all cases, sure. I admitt, I am painting

    black here. But I know Murphys law....

     

    Wouldn't a customer expect that the conversion in the older data

    format is without loss withour changes in his design?

    Ich think he would, and I think he is right with his expectation.

    But I see a lot of obstacles and traps for such a function.

     

    Nevertheless I will discuss your proposal with our development

    people.

     

     

    --

    Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards

    Richard Hammerl

      CadSoft Support -- hotline@cadsoft.de

      FAQ: http://www.cadsoft.de/faq.htm

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    Richard Hammerl wrote:

     

     

    Wouldn't a customer expect that the conversion in the older data

    format is without loss withour changes in his design?

     

    simple answer: no.

     

    On the other hand, I wouldn't spend too much time on it because there

    are more pressing demands.

     

    Oliver

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 17 years ago

    Nick de Smith wrote:

    I've been playing with V5, and very nice it is too! (thanks guys).

     

    However, I publish a few designs on the web & elsewhere, and the bottom line

    is that very few Eagle users will be on V5 for some time, especially as its

    a cost-option and V4.16r2 is pretty stable.

     

    At the moment you've got two options:

    - Stay with V4.16r2, it's pretty stable

    - Upgrade to V5 and restrict yourself to designs within the limits of

    the freeware edition of V5. Are your published designs too complex ?

     

    Markus

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • nickds1
    nickds1 over 17 years ago

     

    "Markus Baertschi" <markus@markus.org> wrote in message

    news:g3to81$590$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...

     

    At the moment you've got two options:

    - Stay with V4.16r2, it's pretty stable

    - Upgrade to V5 and restrict yourself to designs within the limits of

    the freeware edition of V5. Are your published designs too complex ?

     

    No, but I want to work with V5 as it addresses some of the UI issues I had

    with the older versions (which I've been happily using for many years).

     

    I did a deal to upgrade to V5 & move to the professional version (just so I

    can have bigger boards), and it now seems that I'll have to stick with V4 if

    I ever want anyone else to use my designs, as, quite frankly, very few are

    going to upgrade yet.

     

    Cheers

     

    Nick

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    On 2008/Jun/25 7:20 AM, in article g3t9q5$fs7$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de, "Richard

    Hammerl" <ric@cadsoft.de> wrote:

     

    Wouldn't a customer expect that the conversion in the older data

    format is without loss withour changes in his design?

    Ich think he would, and I think he is right with his expectation.

    But I see a lot of obstacles and traps for such a function.

     

    Complete conversion without loss of data?  I wouldn't expect that.  General

    functionality?  Probably.

     

    I think you're trying to save your customers from themselves.  But in this

    case it's not that bad.  You have the original already.  File->Save As won't

    overwrite the file, it will create a new file.  A simple warning to say

    (just like Word or other similar programs) that saving to old formats may

    have data loss is sufficient.  The user can save it out and then see if that

    is sufficient.

     

    The arcs issues isn't a big deal at all, at least to us.  Of all the boards

    we've done I've used arcs maybe twice.  So if I had to redo those by hand

    I'd be more than happy to do that.

     

    I do realise that some things have changed but there's a lot that hasn't and

    saving it out would be useful for us in particular and many people in

    general.

     

    Cheers,

     

    James.

     

    --

     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    ~                                          ~

    ~  James Morrison  ~~~  Stratford Digital  ~

    ~                                          ~

    ~  email:  sales@eagletoolkit.com          ~

    ~  fax:    888.701.8097                    ~

    ~  web:    http://www.eagletoolkit.com     ~

    ~                                          ~

    ~  Online EAGLE Dealer for US and Canada   ~

    ~  EAGLE Design Experts                    ~

    ~  EAGLE Enterprise Toolkit                ~

    ~                                          ~

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

     

    "Nick de Smith" <nick@desmith.net> wrote in message

    news:g3obfd$jle$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...

    I've been playing with V5, and very nice it is too! (thanks guys).

     

    However, I publish a few designs on the web & elsewhere, and the bottom

    line is that very few Eagle users will be on V5 for some time, especially

    as its a cost-option and V4.16r2 is pretty stable.

     

    So, can I save/export a V5 project in V4 format, such that V4 users can

    work with it? Even MS Word allows this sort of functionality. A ULP that

    stripped all the V5 extras (attributes etc.) would probably be the route

    to take...

     

    Is this possible/has it been done?

     

    Thanks

     

    Nick

     

     

    I was ready to upgrade, but this thread has convinced me not to.

     

    JA

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
>
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2026 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube