Wanted - PC borad or example schematics

Would this do what you want?

http://www.gocct.com/sheets/TP/tpb1x3sd.htm

Would this do what you want?

http://www.gocct.com/sheets/TP/tpb1x3sd.htm

In article

<1685845295.241488201215693.JavaMail.jive@e14-cr-vp-appj8-04.premierfarnel

l.net>, noreply-379382@element14.com says...

 

Would this do what you want?

 

http://www.gocct.com/sheets/TP/tpb1x3sd.htm

thanks but no.

(It has graphics, ethernet, sata etc ...)

I'm looking for a processor only board with just processor support on board..

It seems no one makes anything close but thanks to everyone for trying.

I guess I'll have to do my own painful as that is.

In article

<1685845295.241488201215693.JavaMail.jive@e14-cr-vp-appj8-04.premierfarnel

l.net>, noreply-379382@element14.com says...

 

Would this do what you want?

 

http://www.gocct.com/sheets/TP/tpb1x3sd.htm

thanks but no.

(It has graphics, ethernet, sata etc ...)

I'm looking for a processor only board with just processor support on board..

It seems no one makes anything close but thanks to everyone for trying.

I guess I'll have to do my own painful as that is.

You say you want a lot of processing grunt and say you want an FPU yet you rule out graphics chips as "just for graphics". They are not. Take a look at OpenCL or CUDA for example. The graphics architectures for a long time now have been designed to be more useful for things other than gaming. What do you think the NVidia Tesla type products designed with HPC in mind are based upon?

How about something like this? http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/jetson-embedded-systems-uk.html

It's an embedded system based around a combined ARM/GPU architecture. Look specifically at the TX1 which is very minimal but exceedingly capable with lots of number crunching grunt. The ARM is a quad core 64-bit A57 and the GPU is based on their Maxwell architecture with 256 cores and will do 1 TFLOP/s.

Is this minimal enough and powerful enough?

Best Regards,

Rachael

You can, perhaps, your processor carve with an ASIC or FPGA.

Have a nice day.

Best Regards

Gerald

--

Hey, watch it! ARM processors are more powerful than you might think. And no, I'm not talking about microcontrollers, but full microprocessor architecture.

I'll second what a few people have said, we don't know exactly what you want, so I'll come up with a few ideas. I don't have a board readily made, since almost everyone adds in Ethernet or SD controllers, "because they can". Some of us actually like that sort of peripheral to be available, even if we don't use them. Olimex has a lot of boards, and most probably have external peripherals, but most importantly, all the schematics are available, so you can make your own module, depending on what you need. As for x86_64, Curtiss-Wright had a few; processors, bus connectors, and nothing else. https://www.curtisswrightds.com/products/cots-boards/processor-cards/

One option that you will probably say no to is the NVIDIA Jetson Compute Module. Now, before you start, yes they make graphics cards, but NVIDIA is known for making some of the best industry number crunchers. Don't underestimate the power of CUDA. Again, that depends on the numbers you want to crunch, and how. Xeons might be better, CUDA might be better, or other massively parallel chips.

Hope that helps

Everybody please - thank you - I'm done. What I want isn't available

or cannot be identified by the people here. A production project has been started

to identify products and companies  to produce it while we search elsewhere.

Repeatedly telling me that ARM's are good just ignores the fact I've said

they are no good to me. They don't have the power, the architecture is

overcomplex by trying to hit too many buttons amongst other issues

and the licensing is absurd or at the very least unaceptable.

I'm not happy about using X86 either - it's a botched product because

of it's history and is difficult to use for similar reasons to the ARM

processors - it does however have more power and a very wide freely

available toolbase meaning employee skills are easy enough to find.

Just to be clear - intel did a great job of backward protection but that

means an ineficient difficult to use badly designed CPU for new

products. In short - for anything new it's a dog. But there's nothing

comparable so I'm stuck with it for now.

Hopefully that answers the daft comment about "prejudice" earlier. also.

Repeatedly demanding more information "so you can provide an answer"

just tells me you either havn't read what i asked for or don't know enough

to answer in the first place.

So - no need to continue wasting your time.

once again - thank you all for the suggestions but you can stop now.

colin

colin[2] wrote:

 

Everybody please - thank you - I'm done.

Good for you!

colin[2] wrote:

 

Hopefully that answers the daft comment about "prejudice" earlier. also.

 

Repeatedly demanding more information "so you can provide an answer"

just tells me you either havn't read what i asked for or don't know enough

to answer in the first place.

 

So - no need to continue wasting your time.

once again - thank you all for the suggestions but you can stop now.

 

colin

This is just rude, and saying thank you in your last sentence doesn't make it any less so.

Lots of people on here are very capable engineering professionals who share their experience here for free. If we were paid to do consultancy for a project a more thorough response might be more forthcoming but you can't expect people to spend lots of effort trying to help you find your answers for free, especially when you are dismissive and rude.

I wish you the best of luck with your project but I wont partake in your discussions any further.

Regards,

Rachael

Ah,

what I'm remember about it.

There was at that time a processor called "Transputer", - e.g. T400, T800, from INMOS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transputer

That was an open system fine and easy to use for parallel processing.

I don't know where you can actually get this thing, please look for.

I was also interested about it, that was so in the 80's.

Gerald

----

Hi,

You never told us about your projects.
We can not read into your brain what you think.

AND!!! Many projects are under security and we can not divulging our secrets.
But, I think you have a secret project ... from the "COMPANY"?

Have a nice day.

Gerald

---

In article

<874879143.151488369719990.JavaMail.jive@e14-cr-vp-appj8-02.premierfarnell.

net>, noreply-391202@element14.com says...

This is just rude, and saying thank you in your last sentence doesn't make it any less so

 

As a matter of fact I've been very polite.

This newsgroup I believe has not in the least judging by the last few posts.

Clearly not a group of professionals.

Element 14 was a last ditch effort to source what we need - I won't waste my

time in future if this is how people behave here.

.colin