yet another unannounced board revision

Looks like USB and Ethernet connectors have same misalignment.  But it's nice to get mounting holes and more GPIOs, along with fixing 100 Mb/s LED label.

EDIT: and maybe they fixed the 1V8 net.

Gee, just yesterday liz assured us that:

We do encourage speculation and discussion of what future Pis might be like - but we will ANNOUNCE them when they happen. Promise.  [link]

OK, I'll be nice -- it can be hard to synchronize announcements exactly with distributor global shipments.  That said, I'm still guessing that the 512MB unit will coincide with Rob Bishop's New World Hackspace Tour or may be announced earlier, perhaps when they officially announce the Holy Board revision.

I'm busting to post over there about "feature creep", "specs liable to change without notice" and an unjustifiable lack of communication from a tiny company using community based development (as opposed to an Apple, or a Samsung), but as the thread Re "Pi + holes" has been locked pending (supposedly) a front page announcement I shall wait a bit.

It would seem that depending on locale and supplier, a customer who ordered tomorrow may receive a Pi with / without polyfuses / D14 / holes and extra GPIO, so they may wish to delay their order a tad. Perhaps until 512M memory Pi start appearing...

So the Foundation will be aware of the sales ramifications of announcing revisions, but given the community thing do they really think that they can keep rolling out upgrades unnanounced without getting up the noses of people who don't want to be lumbered with old stock?

It also seems from the locked thread that the "cheeseboard" (the one with the holes) wasn't supposed to be out in the wild yet anyway. Don't these folks have any control over what's going on?

Hmmm, perhaps they don't. They are only a tiny charity dealing with multinationals, after all. Or perhaps they are just plain disorganised. Or perhaps they just don't get it.

Jonathan Garrish wrote:

 

I'm busting to post over there about "feature creep", "specs liable to change without notice" and an unjustifiable lack of communication from a tiny company using community based development (as opposed to an Apple, or a Samsung), but as the thread Re "Pi + holes" has been locked pending (supposedly) a front page announcement I shall wait a bit.

Not much point in making comments like that over there.  You'd probably just get banned.

It would seem that depending on locale and supplier, a customer who ordered tomorrow may receive a Pi with / without polyfuses / D14 / holes and extra GPIO, so they may wish to delay their order a tad. Perhaps until 512M memory Pi start appearing...

This is probably what RasPi Foundation was trying to avoid.  Maybe they waited until the old stock shipped before announcing the Holy Board changes, but alert RasPi community members saw the changes and "spilled the cat out of the beans", as Carmen Miranda would say.

I do like the extra GPIOs.  Maybe they brought out I2S like Morgaine requested long ago.  The RasPi thread mentions that something got erased from the silkscreen which would have spoiled the surprise.  It might be interesting to see what happens to RasPi prices at eBay.

Some good points there John. When supply of stock is out of your hands because there are two independent suppliers spread over many countries then performing a timely rollout of a new revision may be impossible - the recent RS stock shortage is evidence that the ebb and flow of the supply chain is understandably beyond the control of the Foundation. It's also likely the there are just as many people ordering Pi without reading the FAQ that there were at the end of February, so they probably won't even realise that there are differences straight away. However, there are plenty of smart folks in the community that will spot this stuff straight away and a constant drip of (obviously welcome) improvements may cause a few fingers to hesitate over that "add to basket" button.

It's tough. A roadmap would be nice, but that might mean punting obsolete versions out at a discount to clear the way for the latest and greatest, which I can't see happening. However, maintaining the current situation might have the same effect - prospective buyers with their finger on the pulse might decide to "wait and see". We have seen three hardware revisions in the last week or two, plus what might be a sneek preview of a 512M model, and there's still the 1v8 issue to tackle. Who knows what else they might toss in with that board revision.

So it's not unimagineable that  yourcomment about ebay price trends may even be applicable to current NOS. Not likely, but not impossible...

And then there's my (utterly unsubstantiated) suspicion about how much the RS / Farnell tail may have decided to start wagging the dog.

So much speculation, so little time!

Am liking the Carmen Miranda pastiche btw.

Some good points there John. When supply of stock is out of your hands because there are two independent suppliers spread over many countries then performing a timely rollout of a new revision may be impossible - the recent RS stock shortage is evidence that the ebb and flow of the supply chain is understandably beyond the control of the Foundation. It's also likely the there are just as many people ordering Pi without reading the FAQ that there were at the end of February, so they probably won't even realise that there are differences straight away. However, there are plenty of smart folks in the community that will spot this stuff straight away and a constant drip of (obviously welcome) improvements may cause a few fingers to hesitate over that "add to basket" button.

It's tough. A roadmap would be nice, but that might mean punting obsolete versions out at a discount to clear the way for the latest and greatest, which I can't see happening. However, maintaining the current situation might have the same effect - prospective buyers with their finger on the pulse might decide to "wait and see". We have seen three hardware revisions in the last week or two, plus what might be a sneek preview of a 512M model, and there's still the 1v8 issue to tackle. Who knows what else they might toss in with that board revision.

So it's not unimagineable that  yourcomment about ebay price trends may even be applicable to current NOS. Not likely, but not impossible...

And then there's my (utterly unsubstantiated) suspicion about how much the RS / Farnell tail may have decided to start wagging the dog.

So much speculation, so little time!

Am liking the Carmen Miranda pastiche btw.